|
An-Naml (The Ant)
Name
The Surah takes its name from the phrase wad-in-naml which occurs in verse
18, implying that it is a Surah in which the story of An-Naml (the Ant)
has been related.
Period of Revelation
The subject matter and the style bear full resemblance with the Surahs
of the middle Makkan period and this is supported by traditions as well.
According to Ibn Abbas and Jabir bin Zaid, "First the Surah Ash-Shu`araa'
was sent down, then the Surah An-Naml and then Al-Qasas."
Theme and Topics
The Surah consists of two discourses, the first from the beginning of
the Surah to the end of verse 58, and the second from verse 59 to the
end of the Surah.
The theme of the first discourse is that only those people can benefit
from the guidance of the Quran and become worthy of the good promises
made in it, who accept the realities which this Book presents as the basic
realities of the universe, and then follow up their belief with obedience
and submission in their practical lives as well. But the greatest hindrance
for man to follow this way is the denial of the Hereafter. For it makes
him irresponsible, selfish and given to worldly life, which in turn makes
it impossible for him to submit himself before God and to accept the moral
restrictions on his lusts and desires. After this introduction three types
of character have been presented. The first type is characterized by Pharaoh
and the chiefs of Thamud and the rebels of the people of Lot, who were
all heedless of the accountability of the Hereafter and had consequently
become the slaves of the world. These people did not believe even after
seeing the miracles. Rather they turned against those who invited them
to goodness and piety. They persisted in their evil ways which are held
in abhorrence by every sensible person. They did not heed the admonition
even until a moment before they were overtaken by the scourge of Allah.
The second type of character is of the Prophet Solomon (peace be upon
him), who had been blessed by God with wealth and kingdom and grandeur
to an extent undreamt of by the chiefs of the disbelievers of Makkah.
But, since he regarded himself as answerable before God and had the feeling
that whatever he had was only due to Allah's bounty, he had adopted the
attitude of obedience before Him and there was no tinge of vanity in his
character. The third type is of the queen of Sheba, who ruled over a most
wealthy and well known people in the history of Arabia. She possessed
all those means of life, which could cause a person to become vain and
conceited. Her wealth and possessions far exceeded the wealth and possessions
of the Quraish. Then she professed shirk, which was not only an ancestral
way of life with her, but she had to follow it in order to maintain her
position as a ruler. Therefore, it was much more difficult for her to
give up shirk and adopt the way of Tauhid than it could be for a common
mushrik. But when the Truth became evident to her, nothing could stop
her from accepting it. Her deviation was, in fact, due to her being born
and brought up in a polytheistic environment and not because of her being
a slave to her lusts and desires. Her conscience was not devoid of the
sense of accountability before God. In the second discourse, at the outset,
attention has been drawn to some of the most glaring and visible realities
of the universe, and the disbelievers of Makkah have been asked one question
after the other to the effect : "Do these realities testify to the creed
of shirk which you are following, or to the truth of Tauhid to which the
Qur'an invites you?" After this the real malady of the disbelievers has
been pointed out, saying, "The thing which has blinded them and made them
insensitive to every glaring reality is their denial of the Hereafter.
This same thing has rendered every matter and affair of life non-serious
for them. For, when according to them, everything has to become dust ultimately,
and the whole struggle of life is purposeless and without an object before
it, the truth and falsehood are equal and alike. Therefore, the question
whether one's system of life is based on the right or wrong foundations,
becomes meaningless for him."
But the discourse, as outlined above, is not meant to dissuade the Prophet
and the Muslims from calling the obdurate and heedless people to the way
of Tauhid; it is, in fact, intended to arouse them from their slumber.
That is why in vv. 67-93 certain things have been said repeatedly in order
to produce in the people a sense of the Hereafter, to warn them of the
consequences of being heedless of it, and to convince them of its coining,
like an eye witness of something, who convinces the other person of it,
who has not seen it.
In conclusion, the real invitation of the Quran that is, the invitation
to serve One Allah alone, has been presented in a concise but forceful
manner, and the people warned that accepting it would be to their own
advantage and rejecting it to their own disadvantage. For if they deferred
their faith until they saw those Signs of God after the appearance of
which they would be left with no choice but to believe and submit, they
should bear in mind the fact that that would be the time of judgment and
believing then would be of no avail.
|