|
|
Karem
Mohammed weeps over the bodies of his family, including his six
children, his wife, two brothers, mother and father who were
killed by U.S. forces
|
Asif
Farooqi, IOL Correspondent
AMMAN,
April 2 (IslamOnline.net) - A long drawn-out bloody war in Iraq would
only ignite more military and ideological conflicts in the region and
bring radicalism and economic hardships rather than boosting
"democracy and peace" as promised by U.S. President George
Bush, said a number of intellectuals and political analysts.
Some
of the intellectuals and analysts IslamOnline.net interview in the
Jordanian capital Amman believe the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq would
further destabilize the political and security situation in the region
which is already shattered by the Palestine-Israeli conflict.
"Political
and security situation in the Arab world is not as the U.S. leaders
perceive it to be and the long-term reaction to the Iraq war in this
part of the world would be far different from what Mr. Bush thinks and
desires," said Tayseer Nazmi, an intellectual and political
analyst.
"We
might see extremism taking foot here resulting in violence" he
warned.
The
expert opined that foreign invasion of an Arab country would seed
insecurity amongst the leaders of other Arab states and they may turn
towards more dictatorships.
This
view is shared by many on the streets of Jordan where parliamentary
elections are overdue for two years now.
Many
fear the vote planned for June this year may not take place while a
war is going on next door. Hence prolonging the abeyance of parliament
for unlimited period.
"Only
beneficiary, if any of this war would be, Israel. And the benefits
have already started of flowing to it with huge amounts of funding
from the U.S. and threatening gestures from the U.S. officials towards
arch anti-Israel countries like Syria
and Iran" said Ghazi Al Saadi, head of the Amman-based think tank
Palestinian Research Center.
Ghazi
was of the view that with Iraq under the control of a U.S. general,
Washington would start work on the new political arrangement for the
Middle East. It means there is new colonialism and imperialism in this
area.
He
said it was high time for the Arab states to re-think their own
problems and workout a joint strategy to get rid of the U.S. and its
influence in the region.
"It
is difficult but we have precedence in the history to be followed like
that of 1973 when Saudi Arabic stopped supplied of oil to the western
countries," added the expert.
Ghazi
said there was nothing in the region which could have stemmed
fundamentalism and religious hatred in the Arabs more than the
Israelis.
He
agreed, however, that a prolonged war would give birth to the
"problems of their own" for many Arab governments.
"America
stands the chance of loosing friends in the Arab world if the war in
Iraq prolongs.
"No
country with the exception of Kuwait would directly or in-directly
continue supporting U.S. for a longer period" Ghazi said.
He
added that if American policy makers accord any importance to
relations with the Arab country, they may well try to finish this war
within weeks and not months.
"Peoples
in the Arab country are very upset with their government's policy of
support to the U.S., open and hidden and no government in the world
can afford to go with this contradiction for a very long time"
Ghazi said.
"I
think after this war Muslims will try everything to harm U.S. and its
interest in east and west" Ghazi warned.