By
Khaled Schmitt, IOL Germany Correspondent
BONN,
January 10 (IslamOnline) – The biggest two Muslim organizations in
Germany threatened to lodge a complaint with the Higher Constitutional
Court against a draft bill to stop Muslims of the northern Ryan State
from slaughtering animals without anesthetization.
In
a joint statement, a copy of which was received by IslamOnline Thursday,
January 9, the Higher Council for Muslims and the Islamic Council
refused a new draft law to organize the slaughter laws, prepared by the
state’s Environment and Consumer Protection Minister Biere Bill Huhin.
Both
considered the draft an attempt to curb Muslims’ freedom in practicing
their religious traditions and place them in a lower rank than other
minorities.
Huhin,
in a press conference last week, declared that the suggested draft law
made it compulsory for slaughtering to be mechanic and after
anesthetization unless an individual offered a document to the effect
that it was necessary, from a religious point of view, for oblation to
be carried out without anesthetization.
In
a clear indication the new draft law is directed only to Muslims, Huhin
set next Greater Bairam as a start date for the new law to be effective.
The
Jewish community in Germany, however, has been enjoying the right to
slaughter without anesthetization since the 1950s.
The
German minister claimed she found no verses (in the Muslim’s Glorious
Book; Holy Qura’n) setting a certain way of slaughtering animals.
The
minister’s announcement sparked a state of discontent and anger among
the one million strong Muslim minority in the Ryan State, accounting for
7% of the 18 million population.
A
meeting Tuesday, January 7, in the HQs of the state’s Environment
Ministry led to a heated confrontation between the minister, on one
side, and heads of local and federal Muslim organizations and groups, on
the other.
For
his part, head of the Higher Council for Muslims in Germany, Dr. Nadeem
Ilias urged Huhin to backtrack on the new law, recalling that the Higher
Constitutional Court had ruled for any Muslim to slaughter oblations
without anesthetization.
He
also stressed that Islam provides animals enough protection and safety
upon being slaughtered.
Ilias
also reminded Huhin that the Higher Constitutional Court had stressed
that the German authorities should not interfere with the Islamic Law
(Sharia) in any way.
However,
Huhin did not offer any indications she may back off or withdraw the new
draft law.
Legal
Unless Harmful
For
his part, eminent Muslim scholar, Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, shedding
light on the issue of Islamic way of slaughter, stated two important
conditions for the act to be legal and Islamic; “we do not torture the
animal before slaughtering it, and we slaughter it as it is still alive
and with a good sharp knife”.
According
to al-Qaradawi, any method of slaughtering that leads to “a swift and
less painful slaughter of the animal, serves the aims of Sharia (Islamic
Law), unless that method causes any kind of harm whether to the animal
or to the human who will eat its meat”.