 |
| Mosque Breakers on Babri domes |
By
IOL South Asia Correspondent
LUCKNOW,
January 10 (IslamOnline) - Ayodhya Temple issue is on the boil again
with the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (World Hindu Council-VHP) setting
February 22 as the "deadline" for handing over the
government acquired land to its trust to begin the construction of the
Ram Temple on the site demolished mosque.
The
VHP has also called the Dharam Sansad (religious parliament) of Hindu
religious leaders to meet in Delhi the same day to take stock of the
Ayodhya issue.
The
VHP, at its Pune conclave late last month, had warned the central
government of a "confrontation" if it failed to hand over
the land to its trust by then.
The
firebrand VHP leader, Praveen Togadia, was the most vocal at the Pune
session. He thundered: "The BJP leadership under Vajpayee should
be prepared to lose the political power to build the Ram Temple and
safeguard the sacred interests of millions of Hindus".
VHP
leaders at the session asserted that it would fully abide by whatever
decision taken by the Hindu religious leaders at its Dharam Sansad.
But the VHP had never kept its promise to the sants (Hindu religious
leaders) on the Ayodhya issue during the past one decade. The sants
had been demanding the immediate construction of the Ram temple there
but the VHP had been postponing it on one pretext or the other which
annoyed the sants.
Most
of the sants in Ayodhya are now against the VHP because they think
that the outfit is playing a political game to help the BJP. The sants
in the temple city now want the issue to be decided by the religious
leaders of both communities there without any outside interference.
It
was, however, for the first time that the VHP leaders had criticized
the Deputy Prime Minister, LK Advani for "misusing" the
temple agenda for his political rise.
The
VHP working president, Ashok Singhal, pointed out that the issue had
brought maximum electoral benefit to the BJP. Singhal conceded that
raking up the issue had adversely affected the Ram Temple cause.
The
VHP working president even went to the extent of commenting that the
Rath Yatra (chariot rally) taken by Advani had, in fact, damaged the
cause of the Temple because other political parties had stopped
supporting it.
It is said that many other speakers at the Pune session had alleged
that the BJP was not serious in the construction of the Ram Temple at
the disputed site in Ayodhya. But seriousness was lacking in the VHP
leaders' criticism of the government and Advani on the Ayodhya issue.
These criticisms are being dubbed as an eye-wash and for the
consumption of the sants who are pressurizing the VHP on the issue.
In fact the raking up of the issue by the VHP now has come in the wake
of the Assembly elections in four states of Himachal Pradesh, Tripura,
Nagaland and Meghalaya in March 2002 and four more states of Madhya
Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhatisgarh and Delhi later this year.
The
VHP had raked up the Ayodhya issue just before the Assembly elections
in Uttar Pradesh early last year ostensibly to help the BJP. It had
planned to do "Shiladaan" (offering consecrated bricks for
the proposed Temple) at the disputed site in March last year after it
launched a 'poornahooti Yagna' (religious rites).
But
the Supreme Court intervened when the kar sewaks (Temple volunteers)
attempted 'Shiladaan' at the disputed site and the VHP failed in its
attempt to make the issue sensitive enough before the UP elections. S
ignificantly,
the VHP virtually slept over the Ayodhya issue till now and it thought
of taking it up only when the Assembly elections are due again.
Survey to gather data on the land underneath the disputed site
Meanwhile,
a nine-member team of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and
experts from Tojo International conducted an underground survey at the
acquired land in Ayodhya to gather data on the land underneath the
disputed site.
The
excavations had been undertaken on the directive of the Lucknow Bench
of the Allahabad High Court. The court, which is hearing the Ayodhya
case, had directed the ASI to undertake the excavation to find out
whether a temple had ever existed at the disputed site before a mosque
was built on it.
The team of experts had brought sophisticated equipment to carry out
the excavation work. It had used ground penetrating radar system for
this purpose. The team is expected to submit its reports to the court
soon.
The
survey was, however, vehemently opposed by both the concerned parties,
particularly the pro-Temple party, on the ground that the survey would
not be a fool-proof method to find the existence of the temple beneath
the mosque.
Meanwhile, no progress has been achieved in filing the charge-sheets
against LK Advani and others, accused in the Ayodhya demolition case
in the Rae Bareli Special Court.
The
Supreme Court on November 29 last year had directed the Central Bureau
of Investigation (CBI) to revive the trial of these accused, who also
included the current federal ministers Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma
Bharati, VHP leader Ashok Singhal and Shiv Sena, leader Bal Thackeray
in the Rae Bareli court instead of at the Lucknow special court, which
was hearing the case since 1993.
The CBI is yet to separate the two cases lying in the Lucknow court,
one against the Sangh leaders, including Advani and others and the
other against VHP kar sewaks in general, and file the case against the
former in the Rae Bareli court as directed by the apex court.
The
Rae Bareli court was set up earlier to hear the case against Advani
and others before the case was transferred to the Lucknow court, which
was hearing the cases against the kar sewaks in general.
In
the meantime, the Uttar Pradesh state government has withdrawn the
security provided in the Lucknow special court, which is hearing the
Ayodhya demolition case against the top Sangh leaders.
This
may be a risk to the security of the precious Ayodhya case documents
and records kept there. A lot of government documents on the Babri
case have already been stolen when a government official bringing them
from Lucknow to Delhi was assaulted and killed on train.