LONDON,
December 4 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - The British government's
attempt to present Iraq as a uniquely evil regime turned into a public
relations flop Monday, December 2, when the Iraqi dissident chosen to
present the new dossier confirmed Iraqi officials used British-made
equipment as instruments of torture, reported a leading British
newspaper on Tuesday, December 3.
Hussain
al-Shahristani, a former nuclear scientist who was allegedly tortured
and jailed for 11 years for refusing to work on Iraq's secret nuclear
program, said: "When I was in jail I was held with British-made
handcuffs.
"In
the cells next door, I could hear the screams of people who were having
holes drilled into their bones. Those drills were made in Britain."
At
a briefing for journalists, al-Shahristani nodded approvingly when
Foreign Office officials were confronted with a barrage of questions
about Britain's silence at the time of the Iraqi gas attack on the
Kurdish village of Halabja in 1988, its support for Iraq in the 1980s
and accusations that the British government was trying to build a case
for war, Telegraph.
"I
am extremely concerned about the consequences of this intervention on
the Iraqi people.
"I
am particularly concerned that weapons of mass destruction could be used
again by the Iraqi regime against the people if there should be any
opposition or uprising."
"The
Iraqi people could pay the price of this war, as they have paid the
price of sanctions and all the previous wars."
The
new dossier publication sparked accusations of political opportunism
from human rights groups, while left-wing Labor MPs stressed the Blair
government was "softening up" the public for war, reported the
Independent.
Amnesty
International accused the British government of turning a blind eye to
human rights abuses elsewhere in the world and seizing on the horrors in
Iraq for political reasons, said the Telegraph.
The
Independent quoted an Amnesty spokesman as saying : "We are
concerned about the timing and whether that introduces a measure of
political opportunism."
Hania
Mufti, of the international pressure group Human Rights Watch, said:
"The timing would not be so much of an issue if it came against a
background of previous actions by the (British) Government to expose
human rights violations."
"This
selective attention to human rights is nothing but a cold and calculated
manipulation of the work of human rights activists," the
Independent quoted Irene Khan, Amnesty's secretary general, as saying.
"Let
us not forget that these same governments turned a blind eye to
Amnesty's reports of widespread human rights violations in Iraq before
the Gulf war."
Menzies
Campbell, the Liberal Democrat Foreign Affairs spokesman, was also
quoted by the Independent as warning: "This dossier, no matter how
horrific its terms, would not provide cover for action against Iraq
unless it were accompanied by a mandate from the UN."
Alice
Mahon, the Labor MP, said: "Why is this being published now? We
know all of this is part of a softening-up exercise."
Tam
Dalyell, the Labor MP for Linlithgow, said: "I think that this
highly unusual, indeed, unprecedented publication is cranking up for
war."
The
Foreign Office's 23-page report is drawn mainly from open sources, such
as reports by Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, with a sprinkling of newer
information from the British government, said the Independent.