NEW
DELHI, September 25 (IslamOnline) - Muslim organizations and leaders
have widely condemned the Swaminarayan temple killings in Gujarat's
political capital, Gandhinagar, appealing for the restoration of sanity
and mutual brotherhood.
The
western Indian state of Gujarat had recently witnessed anti-Muslim
pogroms after a train car burning incident which carried Hindu pilgrims
returning from the temple town of Ayodhya last February. Hindu
nationalists have vowed to build a temple in memory of the mythical
god-king Rama at the site where the historical Babari Masjid once stood,
and which was demolished by Hindu nationalist zealots in December 1992.
The
temple incident started Tuesday, September 24, when two terrorists
stormed into the vast temple complex despite strong security
arrangements. The terrorists who were in the prime of their youth
started firing indiscriminately with assault rifles and hurled hand
grenades. At least 30 worshippers were killed and dozens grievously
injured.
The
operation to flush out the terrorists continued till day-break
Wednesday. Three security personnel, including one from the elite
commando National Security Guards (NSG), were killed. The terrorists
were also gunned down.
Muslim
organizations were unanimous in unequivocally condemning the Gujarat
temple killings. Maulana Rabey Hasani Nadwi, president of India’s apex
Muslim religious body, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB),
came out with a strong condemnation of the killings.
In
a message to IslamOnline, Maulana Nadwi said: “Terrorist attack on the
Akshardham temple of Gujarat is an inhuman act which I strongly condemn.
Killing innocent citizens and attacking religious places of worship is a
hateful and dastardly act which must never be permitted.”
“This
is a conspiracy to destroy India’s secularism, democracy, mutual
understanding and brotherhood. It is the duty of all of us to exercise
utmost restraint on this tragic occasion and foil the unholy intention
and plots of enemies of the country,” Maulana Nadwi's statement added.
In
a special statement prepared for IslamOnline, India's top Muslim scholar
Maulana Wahiduddin Khan said that "What is happening in Gujarat and
elsewhere has nothing to do with religion. Rather, it is an exploitation
of religion for political purposes. Moreover, it is not even politics in
the real sense of the word. Politics is a noble profession. This kind of
religious exploitation degrades politics.
"Those
who indulge in such politics are not true servants of the nation. They
cannot even be described as serving even their own political interests.
For this kind of practice will ultimately lead to disaster, for both the
nation and the exploiter. The ultimate weakness of violence is that it
begets the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil,
it multiplies it."
Syed
Ahmed Bukhari, Imam of Delhi’s historic Jama Masjid, put the onus of
the crime on state chief minister Narendra Modi. Blaming him squarely,
Imam Bukhari said that the outrageous statements against Muslims made by
Modi during his gaurav yatra (pride march) “could have provoked
a retaliatory act.”
Bukhari
termed the act as “anti-Islamic” and said, “Islam does not permit
killing of innocent civilians. I appeal to Muslims and our Hindu
brethren to join hands to wipe out terrorism from the country’s
soil.”
Maulana
Jameel Ilyasi, president of the All India Organization of Imams of
Mosques, in his scathing remarks said that the attack was most
condemnable. “It is a conspiracy to defame Islam and Muslims. The
attack is against the teachings of Islam and this kind of anarchy is
unacceptable to Indian Muslims,” he said.
Terming
the act as “anti-social,” Abdul Wahab Khilji, a senior functionary
of Muslim representative body All India Milli Council, said that such
acts of disruption were only aimed at further weakening the secular
foundations of the nation. He told IslamOnline that forces inimical to
the country had hatched a conspiracy to widen the Hindu-Muslim gulf and
destroy harmony.
“The
time has come to expose these forces and deal with them sternly before
the nation is brought to ruins,” he told IslamOnline.
Maulana
Khilji also demanded a thorough and impartial probe to bring out the
whole truth. He regretted that it had become a practice with the
present-day rulers to link every terrorist activity with Muslims, and
that too when they were not directly involved.
Prof.
Iqbal A Ansari, secretary general of Minorities Council of India, a
human rights organization, said that this heinous and deplorable act
should be widely condemned. The temple killings had been deliberately
targeted to spread chaos across the nation.
“This
brings into focus dangerous implications for retaliatory violence
continuing for the last 20 years. Action-reaction theory has begun and
is likely to continue for the next 20 years,” he told IslamOnline.
Prof
Ansari lamented that Muslims were labeled "terrorists," but
what about Sangh Parivar [RSS family] terrorists who had been
left scot-free to spread a reign of terror. He demanded that “VHP
terrorists”, “Shiv Sena terrorists”, “Bajrang Dal terrorists,”
“RSS terrorists,” and other Hindu nationalist terrorists should also
be brought to book and accordingly dealt with under the law of the land.
“If
terrorists like Narendra Modi, Bal Thackrey, Praveen Togadia, Ashok
Singhal, Vinay Katiyar, Giriraj Kishore, Lal Krishna Advani and others
are not arrested and severely penalized, this process of retaliatory
violence is not going to stop for years to come,” Ansari said.
Dr.
S. Qasim Rasool Ilyas, chief editor of Afkar-e-Milli magazine and
spokesperson of AIMPLB, said that the temple killings were
“unfortunate.” Places of worship should not become targets of
attacks, but it was none else than Narendra Modi himself who allowed
brazen acts of violence against Muslims and wanton destruction of Muslim
mosques, graveyards, etc during the two-month long anti-Muslim pogrom in
Gujarat. After February 28, attacks on places of worship had become
rampant.
About
whether suicidal attacks were permitted by Islam, Dr. Ilyas told
IslamOnline that Ulama (Muslim scholars) hold divergent views on
the issue. As such, one group of Ulama permitted the logic of
suicidal attacks when no option was left for seeking justice like in the
case of the Palestinian struggle against the Zionist occupiers. However,
in India things were different. Efforts should be made for seeking
justice within the parameters of the Constitution and judiciary. The
stage had not come when suicide attacks in India could be justified, he
added