Your Mail

ÚŃČí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Pakistani Anti-Terrorism Court Condemns Six To Death For Gang-Rape

Six people have been condemned to death and each has also been fined 40,000 rupees (about 670 dollars)

DERA GHAZI KHAN, Pakistan, Sept 1 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Six men were early Sunday sentenced to death by hanging by an anti-terrorism court here for their part in a gang-rape sanctioned by a tribal council in Pakistan, news agencies reported.

Eight others were acquitted over the incident which shocked this Islamic nation of 145 million and sparked international outrage, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).

Thirty-year-old divorcee Mukhtiar Mai was raped for more than an hour in a hut in the Punjab village of Meerwala, some 60 kilometers (37 miles) east of here, to atone for her younger brother's alleged affair with a sister of one of the accused rapists.

"Six people have been condemned to death and each has also been fined 40,000 rupees (about 670 dollars). The six include all four rapists and two members of the tribal council which ordered the rape," police official Latis Chandio told AFP.

The four convicted rapists were named as Mohammad Fayyaz, Alahditta, Abdul Khaliq and Ghulam Farid. The tribal council members also sentenced to death were identified as Faiz Mastoi and Ramzan Bachhar.

Hazoor Baksh, brother of the victim, said he was happy justice had been done. "We are grateful to God. The oppressors have met their end -- this is truly justice," he said, but added that all 14 accused should have been punished.

"These acquittals are due to police negligence. They all should have been punished as they were part of the (tribal council) which ordered the gang-rape. But still we have no regrets," Baksh said.

Senior defense counsel Malik Saleem said the convictions would be appealed within seven days.

"The president of the country announced cash compensation of 500,000 rupees (about 8,500 dollars) for the complainant before waiting to see whether the allegations were right or wrong," he said.

"This judgment has been delivered under duress. The judge was clearly under pressure from the media, the government and the Supreme Court. We are going to appeal."

Prosecutors had demanded the death penalty for all 14 accused, including the four men charged with raping Mai and 10 members of the informal village council charged with approving the June 22 attack.

The convicted attackers belong to the powerful Mastoi clan which had allegedly engaged in intimidation of Mai's family and prosecution witnesses.

"The Mastoi tribesmen are revengeful and they are threatening us. We are not afraid of dying. Even if we die, even if they kill us, we will have the satisfaction before Allah (God) that we raised our voice against barbarism," chief prosecution witness Abdul Razak earlier told AFP.

The rape victim, Mai, told journalists at her guarded home on Saturday that she wanted her attackers punished by death. But her brother Baksh said his family was living in fear.

"The police are all around us, they say they will protect us, but we don't know what will happen.

"We don't want to live the rest of our lives under police escort. But we are praying to God that those who committed wrong against us get the punishment they deserve," he said. Mai said she had received repeated threats from the Mastoi clan.

Muktar Mai, the 30-year-old divorced gang-rape victim, comforted by her mother and uncle at her home

"They are threatening that if their people are hanged, then they will kill two of (my clan's) tribesmen for each man hanged."

Dozens of black-clad police commandos, court officials, lawyers, journalists and other observers had arrived at the court early Saturday, but judge Malik Zulfikar Ali did not appear until just after midnight local time (0005 GMT).

Some of those waiting were at a loss to explain the absence of the judge after a month of hearings into what Pakistan's Supreme court labeled "the most heinous crime in 21st century Pakistan".

"This is a test of nerves, unbelievable. We don't know why he has taken so long," said defense lawyer Yasir Khosa.  "We fear that he is being pressurized ... this is astonishing," he said.

Senior defense counsel Malik Saleem was clearly angry when the judge finally announced his verdict early Sunday.

"This inexplicable delay in announcing the judgment when he has already resolved is mind-boggling, and perhaps evidence that he was under pressure to deliver a favorable decision which would please the government," he said. The delivery of the verdict had already been postponed last Tuesday.

Police commandos early Saturday sealed off the court in this Punjabi district capital 400 kilometers (240 miles) south of Islamabad.

The concept of vendetta is unacceptable according to Islamic teachings. Sheikh Ikrama Sabri, the Mufti of Al-Quds (Jerusalem) & Khatib of Al-Aqsa Mosque, states said that in times of war, “it is not permissible for Muslims to rape female captives under the notion of reciprocity. There is nothing like that in Islam. However, if the enemy kills Muslim captives, we are permitted to kill their captives in retaliation.”

IslamOnline’s fatwa department has also said that it has not been recorded along the course of Islamic history that Muslims raped women of their enemies or even killed their children. 

Raping enemies’ women is not allowed in Islam and it is not the manners of Muslims. Though many rape incidents have been recorded, where Muslim women were brutalized by enemies, there is no single record of such incident taken place among Muslims, even as a war retaliatory measures.

Responding to a question sent to IslamOnline on taking the law into one’s own hands to deliver justice, and vendetta in the form of killing, renown Muslim scholar Sheikh  'Atiyyah Saqr said: “one of the rights Islam has made inalienable for man is the right to live. This indicates that taking someone’s life without any due cause is one of the most abhorrent crimes in Islam.

“Moreover, unlawful killing mars the comfort and serenity enjoyed by members of the society; it outlaws the society's etiquette and violates people’s rights. All this may turn the whole community into a place where the law of jungle governs everything. 

“It is normal in all religions and among all rational people that taking others’ lives by assault without any right is unlawful and totally condemned. 

“..it prohibited the killing of anyone without legal reason. Islam, the religion that calls for moderation, combines justice with mercy. This shows that Islam encourages the act of showing mercy and forgiveness, and there is a great reward for whoever tries to be pardoning and forgiving.

“Though Islam approves of and regulates the principle of Qisas, it stipulates that it should not be carried out in an excessive way. Instances of going to extremes in carrying out Qisas are: killing someone other than the murderer, or going beyond the range of those to be killed for murder. It goes without saying that these excessive acts may lead to perpetuation of enmity, renewal of fighting and extend the scope of damage. 

“Also, part of the excessive forms of carrying out Qisas is the single-handed execution of the criminal by the victim relatives without permission of the authorities. This is not permissible. In Islam, the authorities carry out the Qisas.” 

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

Related Links 


News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map