Your Mail

ÚŃČí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Ashcroft Says Secret Court Unnecessarily Limited ‘Patriot Act’ 

Ashcroft's request for dozens of electronic surveillance permits was denied by the Court in May

WASHINGTON , Aug 24 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) – U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft appealed on Friday the refusal of a secret tribunal to authorizes surveillance on suspects in national security cases, a judiciary source said, news agencies reported.

A high-level Justice Department official said Friday that Ashcroft sought an appeal on the grounds that the refusal unnecessarily limited the "Patriot Act," a post-September 11 law providing stiffer penalties and broader investigative powers for use against suspected terrorists, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).

Ashcroft's request for dozens of electronic surveillance permits was denied by the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in May, on grounds that the Federal Bureau of Investigation -- which belongs to the Justice Department -- had repeatedly misled the tribunal.

The decision was made public only on Thursday by the Senate Judiciary Committee. It is the first time a decision of the court has been made public, said AFP.

According to Ashcroft's appeal, the requests to place suspects under electronic surveillance do not fall outside the scope of the law, since it is the tribunal's task to "authorize electronic surveillance for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence information ... to protect (the United States) against specified foreign threats to national security, such as espionage and international terrorism."

"The statute has never prescribed the kinds of efforts, law enforcement or otherwise that may be used to achieve that protection," according to the Justice Department's appeal, written on behalf of the , which belongs to the Department.

"This an appeal by the United States from the partial denial of an application for orders authorizing electronic surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978," as adopted by Congress, the Justice Department said in a statement Friday.

The law created a tribunal divided into two chambers. The first, with 11 federal judges, must authorize electronic surveillance or investigations. The second, with three federal judges, takes up appeals of decisions by the 11-member court.

In the past, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) had required that a search or surveillance be conducted primarily for the purpose of gathering foreign intelligence information. The USA Patriot Act passed in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks amended the standard, providing that the collection of foreign intelligence be "a significant purpose" of the search or wiretap, reported the Washington Post on Saturday, August 24.

The Justice Department said it believes the Patriot Act "allows FISA to be used primarily for a law enforcement purpose, as long as a significant foreign intelligence purpose remains." The act permits intelligence agents to share fully with criminal investigators information they gather that concerns threats to national security, said the paper.

The FISA court, however, said law enforcement officials should not suggest FISA targets or seek particular information, that they should not "direct or control the use of FISA proceedings to enhance criminal prosecution." The court's opinion was issued May 17 but made public only this week, the first time any ruling from the secret tribunal has been released in its 24-year history, added the Post.
 

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map