ÚŃČí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

“Under God” Phrase in Pledge Deemed “Unconstitutional”, U.S. Appeals

Sandra Banning_ the mother of the schoolgirl mentioned in the case_ sees nothing wrong with the phrase under God

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 10 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) -The U.S. government has formally filed an appeal of a California court ruling that the "under God" phrase in the pledge of allegiance violates the Constitutional separation of church and state.

The original ruling, rendered in June, created uproar in a nation bristling with patriotism after the terrorist attacks of last September 11.

Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice are asking for a rehearing on the case before a full panel - called en banc - of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Government attorneys argue in their en banc petition that the original ruling ignored previous court cases, which held that the "under God" clause was a "ceremonial reference" to religion and did not establish a religion preference by the government.

U.S. attorneys also argued that the father of the girl who brought the lawsuit to ban the phrase lacked standing because schools do not require students to say the pledge.

On June 27, U.S. Appeals Court Judge Alfred Goodwin put on hold a ruling by a three-member panel of the left-leaning U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit of Northern California that the pledge was unconstitutional violation of separating of church and state.

Sandra Banning, the mother of the girl mentioned in the case, went to the federal court with her attorney, Paul Sullivan, earlier this week to file a motion to intervene in the Appeals Court.

Banning said she differs with her husband’s view and wants her daughter to be able to recite the pledge, exactly as it stands, as part of her education. Banning said neither she nor her daughter believes there is anything wrong with reciting the words "under God" in the pledge, news agencies reported.

The original ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by California doctor Michael Newdow, a 49-year-old atheist who wanted to prevent his eight-year-old daughter from being pressured to say the pledge in her public school class each morning.

The pledge states: "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

The "under God" clause was added to the 1892 pledge by then U.S. president Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1954 during the anti-communist Cold War fervor of the United States.

U.S. politicians, political commentators and others have condemned the original ruling against the "under God" clause as an example of a runaway judiciary.

U.S. President George W. Bush said the ruling was "out of step with the traditions and history of America."

The majority of a sample group of Americans polled by IslamOnline in the early days of the battle concluded that the majority of Americans, comprised of several different ethnic backgrounds and religions, stated that they did not see anything “unconstitutional” about the phrase “under God.” But, most did state that a country founded on freedom of speech and religion should take it into account.

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map