The
Journal said the new plan Army General Tommy Franks outlined at the
White House at a meeting of the National Security Council Monday hewed
closer to a proposal for a 50,000 to 80,000-strong invasion force,
backed by heavy air power, was gaining support among Bush
administration officials. Further details were not immediately
forthcoming.
White
House officials called the meeting a “routine update,” while
Pentagon sources said to CNN that plans being conceptualized for
toppling Iraqi President Saddam Hussein were “well along” and
continually evolving.
"We're
not talking about what he talked to the President about," said
Lieutenant Colonel Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman when asked about
the report.
However,
it was the latest in a series of leaks on an internal debate on how
best to oust Hussein.
While
no military action is imminent, options range from an invasion
requiring a 250,000-strong force attacking Iraq from three directions
to a direct assault on power centers in Baghdad that would combine
ground and air power.
News
agencies report that according to experts, the U.S. is capable of
launching a rapid attack on Iraq by marshaling 50,000 troops at the
Kuwaiti border in roughly a week, airlifting them in, and bringing
their tanks and heavy equipment on ships through the Strait of Hormuz.
If
any military action were to be undertaken against Iraq, Franks would
command the force. He also oversaw the war in Afghanistan.
Although
he has raised the threat of a military invasion, Bush, however, has
given no indication that any decision has been made on how to oust
Hussein.
The
White House has rejected Iraqi invitations to both the U.N. and U.S.
lawmakers to inspect suspected biological, chemical and nuclear
weapons sites certifying whether Baghdad possesses weapons banned by
U.N. resolutions.
U.N.
Secretary-General Kofi Annan, however, has said Hans Blix, the head of
the U.N. inspection team, could accept the invitation for talks in
Baghdad if Saddam agreed to the return of U.N. inspectors, reports
news agencies