ÚÑÈí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

India’s Politicians Close Ranks To Derail Poll Reforms

Congress Party's Sonia Gandhi and BJP's Advani in Parliament

By Md. Zeyaul Haque, Special to IslamOnline 

NEW DELHI, August 3 (IslamOnline) - In a rare display of unanimity, India’s politicians across the entire ideological spectrum have come together to water down poll reforms suggested by the Supreme Court of India and the Election Commission. 

The Supreme Court had, in a landmark order on May 2, desired that persons seeking election to state or national legislature should declare their financial assets (as well as those of their family members) and their criminal antecedents (if any) at the time of filing their nomination papers before election presiding officers. 

Taking a cue from the apex court, the Election Commission (EC) passed, on June 28, the rule that people seeking election to state or central legislatures would have to declare their assets and criminal antecedents before presiding officers, who would have the right to cancel candidatures of people whose financial assets had not been declared properly, or who had been ivolved in cases of serious offences. 

Election presiding officers are bureaucrats and, as government employees, come next to the politicians in the pecking order. Politicians as public representatives are ultimate masters.  

Politicians reacted sharply to the Election Commission rule empowering presiding officers to reject improperly furnished nomination papers. They moved on to enact legislation overturning EC rules, restoring the superiority of the political class over bureaucracy. 

On July 15, the central government circulated a draft bill saying for a politician's candidature to be cancelled, he or she would have to be charge-sheeted in at least two criminal cases over the last six months. 

However, Friday, August 2, the politicians decided in the final bill presented to Parliament (to be later turned into an “Act” of legislation) that for disqualification a politician would have to be "convicted" and awarded a "two-year or longer" prison term. The politicians were unanimous that mere charges against somebody should not prevent him or her from contesting elections. 

The bill seeks to amend Representation of People Act, and is appropriately called Representation of People (Amendment) Bill, 2002. 

The more important dilution came in the financial assets-declaration rule of the EC. The politicians decided that instead of declaring financial assets before the election, a politician would have to declare it after election to the Speaker [chairman] of the lower house of Parliament or the deputy chairperson of the upper house of Parliament, depending upon which house the person is elected to. 

This effectively scuttles the Supreme Court’s order to enlighten voters on critical aspects of the person’s life whom they are going to elect. 

The bill, which would be turned into law in the current session of Parliament, also reasserts the supremacy of politicians over government officials, howsoever high.   

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map