ÚŃČí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

Saudi, Iran Repeat Opposition to U.S. Strike on Iraq

Prince Saud and Kharazi, growing brotherly relations between the two Muslim states.

TEHRAN, Aug 3 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - As Washington upped its rhetoric against Baghdad, the Foreign Ministers of Saudi Arabia and Iran expressed joint opposition Saturday, August 3, 2002, to any U.S. military action against common neighbor Iraq.

"We have always opposed any attack against an Arab or Muslim country and that also means Iraq," Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal told reporters as he was welcomed at the airport by his Iranian counterpart Kamal Kharazi at the start of a one-day visit, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).

"That is Iran's position too," Kharazi said. "We too have the same position. As we have said on various occasions, we are opposed to any attack launched against a Muslim country."

The Saudi Foreign Minister said he was bringing a message from Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz, Saudi Arabia's de facto ruler, for the Iranian leadership as part of the "continuing political consultations" between the two regional powers.

"This message deals with the Middle East situation and, in general terms, with the whole region," said Prince Saud, who was due to hold afternoon talks with moderate President Mohammad Khatami after a morning meeting with Kharazi.

"We have a lot of things to discuss and we must consult together on regional issues," the Saudi Minister said.

"We want to continue our discussions with our Iranian brothers as usual."

Despite U.S. misgivings, Saudi Arabia moved much closer to Iran's Islamic regime since the election of the moderate Khatami as President in 1997.

The longtime rivals inked a security pact in April last year during a landmark visit to Tehran by Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz, the first Saudi Interior Minister to visit Iran since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

Khatami visited the kingdom in 1999 and the two nations have also worked together since 1999 to orchestrate oil production cuts by the OPEC cartel that stabilized world prices.

The consultations between the two Gulf powers, came as U.S. officials warned Washington was determined to oust the Baghdad regime whatever it did.

U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell Saturday emphatically rejected an Iraqi offer to discuss a return of UN weapons inspectors who fled in December 1998 on the eve of the last massive U.S.-British air strikes on Baghdad.

Under Secretary of State John Bolton hammered home the point in an interview on BBC radio.

"Let there be no mistake. While we also insist on the reintroduction of the weapons inspectors, our policy at the same time insists on regime change in Baghdad," Bolton said.

"That policy will not be altered, whether the inspectors go in or not."

Meanwhile, the Saudi press Saturday, August 3, warned the United States of a major catastrophe in the Middle East if Washington goes ahead with plans to launch war on Iraq and oust President Saddam Hussein.

The daily newspapers also accused the kingdom's main Western ally of working in tandem with Israel to change the political map of the region.

"Certainly this decision (to launch war on Iraq) will lead the region into a catastrophe, and its victims will be many," said Okaz in an editorial.

"If the goal is to change the political map (of the region) and continue the war of change from one country to another, the result will be ... deep problems," it added.

"We warn against going ahead in the policy of change, and strongly caution that the region will never be another Afghanistan."

Al-Bilad newspaper charged that as Washington prepared to change the regime in Baghdad, Tel Aviv was using the same pretext to remove the Palestinian leadership.

"The seriousness of the events in Palestine is that they coincide with American plans to strike Iraq and change its regime. Israel appears to be imitating the U.S. plans ... to overthrow the Palestinian Authority," Al-Bilad said.

"All wars are dirty, but the worst are those which do not have international authorization and are not aimed at eliminating oppression or preventing a human catastrophe ... On the contrary, they are aimed at strengthening oppression and deepening catastrophe," the paper added.

The Saudi press, normally reflecting official thinking in Riyadh, on Wednesday accused the United States of seeking to occupy neighboring Iraq to control the whole region.

The newspaper's comments come amid increasing speculation about U.S. plans for a possible military campaign, and after Iraq invited chief UN inspector Hans Blix to Baghdad for talks.

The English-language Arab News called on Iraq to allow the unconditional return of arms inspectors and warned of disasters if a war was launched.

"For the moment, everyone - except Bush and the Iraqi opposition - agrees that an attack on Iraq would send disastrous shock waves throughout the Arab world," the paper warned.
   

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map