"SFOR
will remain deployed in Bosnia. No delegation, including the United
States, has indicated a desire to leave SFOR... SFOR will continue its
work," spokesman Yves Brodeur said after a meeting of NATO
ambassadors to discuss the U.S. position.
Washington
on Sunday vetoed a six-month renewal of a U.N. police mission in
Bosnia after other U.N. Security Council members rejected
Washington’s demand to make the mission immune from the
International Criminal Court (ICC).
The
U.S. is one of five permanent Security Council members with veto power
- along with Britain, France, Russia and China, CNN reports.
The
veto's immediate effect was to bring the 1,536-strong police-training
mission in Bosnia known as UNMIBH to an end when its mandate expired
Monday, although the United States granted a 72-hour extension to
enable it to disband smoothly. The United Nations now has until
Thursday morning to find a deal.
It
also cast doubt over the future of the 19,000-strong SFOR. Although
SFOR does not legally require a council mandate, some of the 19
contributing NATO members have indicated they will withdraw their
troops without one.
SFOR,
deployed in Bosnia in 1995 to maintain peace and security in following
the country's 1992-95 war, comprises 19,000 troops, including some
3,300 U.S. servicemen and women.
The
International Criminal Court, which will try war crimes, crimes
against humanity and genocide, opened its doors in The Hague on Monday
despite opposition from the United States, which fears its nationals
could be targeted for politically-motivated trial.
CNN
reports that Washington objects to the idea that Americans could be
subject to the court's jurisdiction if a crime is committed in a
country that has ratified the treaty. The U.S. expressed its intention
not to support the court in a letter to the U.N. in May.
Supporters
of the Court expressed dismay at U.S. actions.
"History,
I believe, will record the actions of the U.S. administration of
President George W. Bush to wreck U.N. peacekeeping and the
International Criminal Court as one of the most shameful lows in
global U.S. leadership," said William Pace, head of the
International Coalition for a Criminal Court, according to CNN.
French
Ambassador Jean-David Levitte said there was no need "to kill
off" the Bosnian mission and that the U.S. should simply withdraw
the 46 U.S. police officers serving in it and allow the mission to
continue.
Bosnia's
International High Representative, Paddy Ashdown, spoke to U.S.
Secretary of State Colin Powell about his concerns, warning that
Bosnia would not have the means to plug the gap if the international
police force was pulled out, reports news agencies.
"He
said he hoped the U.S. Administration would not do anything that
placed at risk the huge progress toward peace and stability" that
Bosnia has achieved since the 1992-95 war, Ashdown's office reported.
Earlier,
the U.S. Ambassador to Bosnia, Clifford Bond, said its troops serving
with SFOR would remain.
"U.S.
troops will stay in Bosnia. The mandate of SFOR is based on the Dayton
Peace Accords and the decisions of the Peace Implementation
Council," Bond told reporters.
"Our
strategic commitment to the Balkans and to Bosnia remains rock solid.
U.S. troops will remain in Bosnia," Bond said.
U.S.
Ambassador John Negroponte, in an effort to assure allies of the
U.S.’s role, said: "The United States has contributed and will
continue to contribute to maintaining peace and security in the
Balkans and around the globe.”
"But
we will not ask them [U.S. personnel] to accept the additional risk of
politicized prosecutions before a court whose jurisdiction over our
people the government of the United States does not accept."
"With
our global responsibilities, we are and will remain a special target,
and cannot have our decisions second-guessed by a court whose
jurisdiction we do not recognize."