Your Mail

ÚÑÈí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 


A Test of Ignorance

By Firas Al-Atraqchi
Freelance Columnist

28/03/2004

Funeral of Sheikh Ahmad Yassin in Gaza City, March 22, 2004.

A professor at the University of Georgia once debated his students whether politicians should take intelligence quotient tests or, at the very least, general knowledge, mathematics, logic, and other aptitude tests. After all, winning an election in a democratic society is by no means a marker for intelligence, reasoning, or logic. You got the big bucks; you got the big ads and election in the bag. That’s how capitalism and democracy work hand in hand.

Most students in the professor’s political science course felt that politicians should be tested for their skills and abilities to fulfill the obligations of their elected seats.

Unfortunately, while the above story is true, its implications are as likely as Gandalf running for Secretary-General of the United Nations. Won’t happen.

But, in light of Israel’s assassination of blind quadriplegic cleric Sheikh Yassin, spiritual leader of Hamas, a test of intelligence may be in order.

Israel’s stated purpose was to “decapitate” Hamas, allegedly a terrorist organization, by removing its most senior champion. Disarray within Hamas ranks, and perhaps the sowing of fear among Palestinians, was hoped for.

One Israeli official said that the assassination of Yassin would pay off in the long run and bring peace to the region. Another Israeli official claimed it was part of the international war against terrorism and urged the world community to chip in. Indeed, Israel would like nothing better than to have international mercenaries do its dirty work. Reminds one of the invasion of Iraq.

However, Israel has seriously undermined itself.


The hunger will not go away whether you kill one Palestinian or a thousand.


Consider the Palestinians. For more than three years, since the Intifada erupted in 2000, they have walked the downward spiral of hopelessness and resignation that they will never see nationhood. Things have steadily gotten worse for the Palestinians. Some 2,700 Palestinians and 900 Israelis have died in this period of time. Palestinian President Yasser Arafat - not really a president, but a prisoner - is holed up under Israeli siege in Ramallah. The West Bank is an economic trash bin. The Gaza Strip is the most highly populated area per square foot in the world. Unemployment ranges at 85 percent. There are daily incursion strikes against targets which see “collateral damage” by the dozens. Pregnant Palestinian women miscarry at checkpoints because 20-year old Israeli soldiers disallow crossing to areas where they could have sought medical attention.

What baffles is the level of ignorance of Western media that props so-called “Middle East analysts” and asks “what does this do to the peace process?”

What peace process? Was it not Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon who in 1999 declared he would not allow the creation of a Palestinian state and would work to undo the Madrid and Oslo peace initiatives? And was it not US President George Bush who declared before the UN in September 2002 that he envisioned a Palestinian state by 2005? Willful deception?

No, you cannot stifle a hunger, and the Palestinians are hungry. They hunger for justice. They hunger to raise their children in peace. They hunger for a nation in which they can feel pride, strength, and honor. They hunger for a world body that hears their cries and alleviates their plight. The hunger will not go away whether you kill one Palestinian or a thousand. It has not gone away in 55 years nor will it likely go in another 155 years.

Add to that the importance of Hamas activities in Palestine. While many would like to compare Hamas to al-Qaeda, the differences are overwhelming: Hamas is a socio-political entity with a military wing. It builds social programs, sees to people’s education when Israeli forces cordon off schools, and distributes clothing and food in times of siege.

Al-Qaeda, on the other hand, is comprised of disgruntled and disenfranchised political aspirants. Members of al-Qaeda have abandoned their countries to wreak havoc elsewhere. They have not lifted a finger to alleviate the plight of any peoples.

Hamas is fighting for a country, for nationhood.


Hamas is fighting for a country, for nationhood.


The Palestinian people have the enshrined right to resistance of an occupier who has defied more than 140 UN resolutions and agreements. In February alone, some 87 Palestinian civilians were killed by Israeli incursions into Gaza and the West Bank. True, suicide bombings are deplorable, abhorrent, and contrary to the laws of nature. But so is the forcible occupation of a people for more than 55 years. So is the humiliation that Palestinians must endure at checkpoints. The unemployment, the killings. Do Western media speak of the 47,000 Palestinians that have been maimed and wounded since 2000?

No, it is not likely Hamas will die.

So, on that front, Israel may have committed a blunder. But the greater blunder is evident in Iraq’s reaction to the murder of Sheikh Yassin. For years, readers were forced to swallow the regurgitated and externally-scripted diatribe of Ann Coulter (her ranting against the Spaniards is despicable!), William Safire, Thomas Friedman, William Buckley, and the infamous George Will who pointed at Saddam’s support of “terrorism” in Palestine as reason to consider Iraq a terrorist state in collusion with al-Qaeda. Well, Saddam is no more, the ties between Saddam and al-Qaeda were revealed to have been fabricated, and the Iraqi people are “free.” So why is Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, America’s figure of stability in Iraq, condemning the assassination? On March 22, Sistani said that all efforts must be indulged to combat the terrorist state of Israel as thousands of Iraqis marched in support of Palestine and the fight to dispel Israel from occupied territory. The 24-hour period since Yassin’s murder witnessed a spate of attacks in Iraq resulting in the deaths of some 19 Iraqi policemen and security guards, three US Marines, two Finnish “businessmen” and numerous assassination attempts on judges and civil servants working with the Coalition.


Do Western media speak of the 47,000 Palestinians that have been maimed and wounded since 2000?


“We as Muslims stand hand in hand with our brethren in Palestine and we say to them that we are ready to extend all forms of assistance, be it moral or physical,” said the young cleric Muqtada as-Sadr in Iraq yesterday. He lauded Yassin as a hero and said his killing was “an aggression against a man of virtue and jihad.”

Meanwhile, according to CNN, a 1,000-strong crowd of Shiites and Sunnis protested against Israel and turned violent in Ramadi, Iraq.

Funny, wasn’t this the kind of behavior one expected under Saddam’s regime? How could the “free” Iraqis be pledging support for Hamas when it was the US who “liberated” Iraq as part of its “war on terrorism”?

Backfire, anyone?

So, there you have it. The murder of Yassin will inevitably hurt US interests in Iraq. The killing of the two Finns was accompanied by a statement distributed widely among Iraqi sources of Finnish companies extorting money out of Iraq. Could Iraqis be targeting citizens of countries they feel are robbing the country blind? And what of the increased attacks against Iraqis working with the Coalition? Could it be that now they are seen as working with the Israelis by default since it was a US-made Apache helicopter that took out Yassin? Could it be that the US refusal to condemn the attack on Yassin is fueling hatred of Americans and those who collude with them in Iraq?

Is it any longer unthinkable to consider that US policies in Iraq and recent Israeli aggression against Palestinians are becoming the catalyst of an Islamic revolution that will sprout in Iraq and envelope the region?

Readers can choose to ponder these questions or to believe the gospel according to the White House: Iraq is better off now and the world is a more peaceful, secure place.

Yes, time to test politicians’ intelligence.

Firas Al-Atraqchi is a Canadian journalist of Iraqi heritage. Holding an MA in Journalism and Mass Communication, he has eleven years of experience covering Middle East issues, oil and gas markets, and the telecom industry. You can reach him at firascape@hotmail.com.

The articles posted on this page reflect solely the opinions of the authors.

Views Archive

Advanced Search

Views & Analyses

 
Send Mail

Related Links:


News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map