|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Intolerance Towards Islam” Under Scrutiny by France’s CNCDH
|
|
By Sylvia Zappi
Le Monde, November 24,
2003
(Translation
and commentary by Norman Madarasz)
|
16/12/2003
|
|
|
In
a recent study, France’s Commission
Nationale Consultative des Droits de l'Homme (CNCDH --National Consultative Commission on Human Rights)
acknowledges the existence of anti-Muslim discrimination in the
country, and provides some details of its signs.
One
ought to speak of phenomena typical of “intolerance towards
Islam,” instead of Islamophobia. But the string of violent
events, such as hostile reactions to the debate on Islam’s
place in French society, is very real indeed. Such are the
conclusions of a study drawn by the Commission Nationale
Consultative des Droits de l’Homme (CNCDH), which should be
published in its March 2004 Annual Report. Le Monde has
acquired a copy of the report.
|
|
|
French Muslims performing Jumu’ah (Friday) prayer |
According
to France’s CNCDH, for several months now acts of violence
have been aimed at Muslim religious symbols, while “hate
books” and certain mass media have targeted Islam. The CNCDH,
an organization providing policy analysis to the Prime Minister,
is made up of representatives from public administration and
different associations [French NGOs according to the 1901
law]. Faced with recent racist acts, it has sought to determine
whether a specific type of discrimination is now affecting
Muslims in France.
The
study was drafted by Sarah Benichou, former vice-president of SOS-Racisme
[an anti-racist association founded in 1984]. Its results were
harshly debated during a CNCDH assembly on Friday, November 21.
Some associations, like the Mouvement Contre le Racisme et
pour l’Amitie entre les Peuples (MRAP-- Movement against
Racism and for Friendship among Peoples), or the Ligue des
Droits de l’Homme (Human Rights League) were critical of
the first version. In their view, it tended to deny the
phenomenon of “Islamophobia” and explained it through the
international context that blames Islam itself for this
stigmatization. Strongly amended but eventually validated, the
study’s final version recommends using the term
“Islamophobia” with “utmost precaution.” Among the other
reasons evoked, there is an insistence on preventing any amalgam
between the terms “Arab” and “Muslim” when the current
expression of intolerance in France is most often confused with
an anti-Maghrebin racism.
Any rigorist practitioner of Islam is suspected of practicing political Islamism. |
|
For
the first time, the CNCDH has nonetheless highlighted the
specifics of anti-Muslim racial discrimination. The authors have
sought to define this emerging phenomenon. What the latter
points to is “unreasoned fear and total rejection of Islam as
a religion, way of life, community project as well as
culture.” This hostility, fed by international events like the
Algerian civil war, the GIA (Groupe Islamiste Armé)
terrorist actions in France in 1995, the Taliban regime in
Afghanistan and 9/11, has been “reinforced with the mixed-up
use of terms such as Muslim, Islamic, fundamentalist, Islamist
and terrorist,” the study asserts. These amalgams wield
disgrace on anyone who is a rigorist practitioner of Islam by
suspecting them of practicing political Islamism.
“Going
into Action”
|
|
|
French columnist Claude Imbert has recently declared himself an “Islamophobe.” |
The
report goes on to portray the acts of violence that have been
committed against Islam. According to the authors, they are hard
to number since the Ministry of the Interior has never made such
discrimination a specific category. Nor are the facts related to
discrimination listed by any community organizations, as is done
regularly with anti-Semitic acts. However, the study does cite
certain “actions,” such as anti-Muslim tracts distributed by
the far-right, attempted torching of places of worship, verbal
or physical violence aimed at public figures linked to Islam,
anti-Muslim graffiti and, last but not least, statements made by
some celebrities in public.
While
awaiting the 2003 statistics, the study lists several examples
of serious violence committed in 2002: Molotov cocktails thrown
at the mosques of Mericourt (in the Pas-de-Calais region) and
Chalons (in the Marne region), on April 25 and 27, and on March
24 against the Ecaudin mosque (in the Rhone region); a letter
bomb was sent to an association seated at the Perpignan mosque
(in the Pyrenees-Orientales), on April 9; an Islamic religious
sculpture was profaned in Lyon, on April 24; attempted torching
of a place of worship in Rillieux-la-Pape (Rhone), on December
27; anonymous tracts distributed during the presidential
campaign [held in April 2002 which had set far-right racist
candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen against incumbent president Chirac].
As
for 2003, three facts can be pointed to: profaned tombs in the
Haut-Rhin region in July, torching of a place of worship at
Nancy, and profanation of an Islamic square in the Meuse region
in March. These are only examples that, in the CNCDH’s view,
“fall well under the real number [of racist acts committed
against Islam],” especially as far as verbal insults and
lighter forms of violence is concerned.
CNCDH considers French hostility towards Islam as “little acknowledged and feebly fought against.” |
|
The
report brings attention to how certain French Internet sites
broadcast explicitly racist propaganda toward Islam. It also
highlights speeches made by elected officials, foremost of which
is the mayor of Nice, Jacques Peyrat, for whom “mosques cannot
be conceived of as existing within a secular Republic,” and
notes the publicly manifested reticence every time a mosque is
built in France. The CNCDH has denounced the “media-inspired
amalgams” that explain Islamist terrorism by “singling out
Islam as its sole ideological cause.” Sensationalist images,
headlines and commentary, “demagogic and paranoiac in tone,”
feed “conspiracy fantasies” and have multiplied over the
last few months in the media. The study makes special mention of
statements made by Claude Imbert, a columnist from the weekly Le
Point, who recently declared himself an “Islamophobe”
(see Le Monde, November 5).
Ultimately,
the CNCDH considers such hostility towards Islam as “little
acknowledged and feebly fought against.” It recommends
up-grading the course content taught in religion classes at both
elementary and high schools, and “is favorable to having
places of worship be made more visible.” Most of all, the
CNCDH stresses the importance of “waging a strong public
policy battle against all types of racial discrimination.”
Read
commentary piece on this article: “France
Faces Up to Anti-Muslim Discrimination” by
Norman Madarasz
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Views &
Analyses |
|
|
|