|
Chechnya: Aslan Maskhadov’s Call to Put an End to the War
|
Translated for IslamOnline by Norman Madarasz
|
08/10/2003
|
Interview
published in Le Monde, October 4, 2002, by Sophie Shihab.
|
|
Aslan Maskhadov |
Tightly
controlled by Moscow, a “Presidential Election” was
organized on Sunday October 5 in the small Republic of Chechnya,
which is still at war. The Kremlin’s favorite, Akhmed Kadyrov,
was guaranteed victory after the successive withdrawal of most
of the other candidates. The OSCE and Council of Europe refused
to send field observers to Chechnya. In an interview with Le
Monde, the Chechen Independence leader, Aslan Maskhadov, elected
President in 1997, reckons the Russian “military adventure”
in Chechnya to be “a total failure.” Denying any ties to
al-Qaeda and “international terrorism,” he proposes a peace
plan and calls out to international institutions to put an end
to the war. Living clandestinely for four years, Mr. Maskhadov
moreover condemns suicide bombings.
How
would you describe the situation in Chechnya?
Anyone
who thinks little must see and recognize that Russia’s
military adventure in Chechnya is a total failure. The drama is
that Putin is afraid to admit it. He is trying to win time.
After four years of a terrible, degrading war, General Troshev
[one of the commanding officers of the 1999 offensive] ended up
declaring that the army is unable to resolve anything whatsoever
in Chechnya, and that he had foreseen this end ever since the
start of operations. He had opposed the plan to send Russian
troops across the Terek [the river separating North from South
Chechnya], persuaded as he was that this would lead to a Russian
defeat once again. Glory be to Allah!, they have lost this war,
and shamefully so. Today, they organize veritable shows, such as
the referendum [in March] as well as this election [on October
5]. We can only smile regarding such productions, which will
deliver nothing.
Putin
is really in an impasse, especially if he thinks that Kadyrov,
his stooge, as well as the group of drug addicts surrounding
him, will arrive at anything whatsoever here. They will be able
neither to frighten the Chechen people nor to force it to their
knees, let alone compel the Chechen combatants to give up the
resistance. Putin is fooling himself if he believes he is able
to provoke a civil war here. Where a foreign invasion unfolds,
there is no civil war. We will liberate our country from the
occupying forces and put an end to relations between Russia and
the Chechen State, no matter how difficult the task may be.
How
would you respond to comments made on the links between Chechen
groups and al-Qaeda?
We
deny and have always denied having the slightest link with
al-Qaeda. We have nothing in common with international
terrorism. Here, a struggle for national liberation is taking
place. We do not know bin Laden. He represents nothing for us.
Shamil
Basaev (the Chechen rebel field commander) has claimed that he
organized several suicide bombings in Russia. Do you consider
him to be an international terrorist?
“We
deny and have always denied having the slightest link
with al-Qaeda." |
|
Basaev
has no ties with international terrorism. Basaev has no contact
with either al-Qaeda or with bin Laden. I repeat: this is an
official declaration. Likewise, Basaev has no foreign bank
account, and is not preparing to request a foreign visa. Basaev
is a warrior. He is someone who is exercising revenge. He uses
the same means as does the enemy, which is using them against
the Chechens, against civilians. It’s eye-for-an-eye. In the
first place, this tactic is aimed at the main structure of the
Russian state, the FSD [the secret service, and former KGB].
Today, as Troshev himself said, the army decides nothing. The
war is being waged by the FSB. Were it possible to subordinate
Basaev and channel all of his energy against the enemy by using
acceptable methods, then he would accomplish many more things.
Unfortunately, there is great disagreement between us on this
point. I say that we have to lead an organized combat against
Russia through diplomacy, a military tactic and strategy. I
condemn the methods and forms of action that result in the
suffering of innocent civilians. Basaev has his methods. But he
has nothing to do with international terrorism.
“Kamikazes
must also be subordinated to a State discipline.” |
|
Kamikazes
must also be subordinated to a State discipline so that their
hate may be directed against the enemy, channeled into organized
combat. But this turns out to be impossible because the enemy is
as follows: its methods are savage, fearsome, and cruel.
Stopping all of that, putting an end to the explosions in
Tushino, Mozdok, and Nazran—this is something only Putin can
do. By putting an end to this senseless war. After Tushino
[where two Chechen women detonated their belts packed with
explosives during a July concert in Moscow, resulting in 18
deaths] I made declarations condemning such acts. Even in
fighting an enemy for which nothing is sacred, I forbid methods
that may inflict suffering onto innocent persons.
What
plan do you propose by which to end the conflict? What would be
acceptable?
The
Palestinians have an administration and should be protected by
international law. But they live on the territory of a foreign
State, which treats in the way it chooses to, while
international institutions pretend to see nothing, and the
conflict continues. Innocent people are dying on both sides.
This is why the principle proposed by Ruslan Khasbulatov [former
chairman of the Russian Parliament, and a Chechen] according to
which Chechnya could be subject to international law while
preserving the territorial integrity of the Russian State,
cannot satisfy us. For remaining within Russian constitutional
space is dangerous for the Chechens. It would mean war again,
genocide again. Russia is not a legal State. It is a State
devoid of any reason, led by a group devoid of policies,
especially toward the nationalities and smaller nations.
Remaining within its framework is dangerous for us.
What
do you expect from the Western countries?
“Western
States keep playing with, and around, Russia.” |
|
The
Chechen Foreign Minister, Ilias Akhmadov, has put forth, with my
authorization, a plan foreseeing “conditional independence.”
For it to have a chance it requires the will of the UN, the OSCE
[the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe] or the
Council of Europe, which must compel Russia to take what is the
only reasonable step: putting an end to this dirty war.
The
drama is that the Western States keep playing with, and around,
Russia. They pretend to see nothing, to not know who exploded
the apartment buildings in Moscow, Volgodonsk and Buinaksk in
1999.
But
Putin has dug himself into an impasse. He needs help. Only the
West and its international institutions can grant him that help.
First of all, they have to quit playing with him. Then, they
must compel to respect international law. We have put forth the
Akhmadov plan, that is, the Maskhadov plan.
Are
you worried about the rise of Wahhabism in Chechnya?
“Putin
has dug himself into an impasse.” |
|
The
problem no longer exists in Chechnya. It has been exaggerated
and utilized by the FSB and Kadyrov to provoke a civil war here.
I have met with all our combatants, all our mujahidins, from
west to east: this problem does not exist. The youth who had
taken the Qur’an into their hands at the outbreak of the
war—whom the Kadyrovtsi—Kadyrov’s men called
“Wahhabits”—now ask me to accept their apologies. That is
because they were persuaded that I had agreed to make
concessions with Russia. But when they saw that their President
was continuing the struggle, they apologized to his face. And I
myself, I have asked them to accept my apologies for the fact
that at one time I had a mufti on my side, a traitor to the
nation: Kadyrov.
A
foreign ideology cannot be introduced into Chechnya—were it
through an Arab or al-Qaeda. Our experience is rich and long
enough for us to be Muslims and know what jihad is. The claim
according to which we are led by someone from abroad and that we
have ties with bin Laden is insulting for us.
|