|
Israel
Fights Islam to the Last American
|
By
Mohamed Khodr
Freelance writer – Washington D.C. |
10/04/2002
|
 |
|
“Decatur
boarding the Tripolitan”: the American Barbary wars 19c,
seen as America’s first encounter with Islam |
Prejudice
and demonization has been the “white man’s burden” and
justification for colonialism and enslavement of “colored” man
throughout history. It began with the Greeks and Romans,
followed by the hostility toward Jews, then Islam, until the
miraculous irony of the post-Holocaust era where the newly found
partnership of the “Judeo-Christian” world became the defenders
of freedom against the “evil empire” of Communism and the
establishment of the Western Zionist colony of Israel. That was
followed by the newly created “evil du jour - Islam” in 1990
after Communism's fall in order to serve and maintain the
military-industrial-media complex of America's elite.
It
is no coincidence that Bernard Lewis, America's Islamophobic
spokesperson, wrote his article “Roots of Muslim Rage” in 1990
immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union (Sept., Atlantic
Monthly). Samuel Huntington, Jewish American, followed in 1993 with
his infamous “The Clash of Civilizations” (Foreign Affairs),
although Huntington obviously took the title from Basil Matthews'
1926 book “Young Islam on Trek: A Study in the Clash of
Civilizations.” Matthews, a missionary, saw a massive
opportunity for Christian conversion among Muslims after the Ottoman
Empire's collapse. He wrote: “They [Muslims] have discovered that
the possessors of such power - the rulers over nine tenths of the
habitable earth and six out of every seven Muslims on the surface -
are the races of Western Christendom.”
European
Christian literature is replete with derogatory and insulting
characterizations of Islam and it's Prophet (pbuh). Their
argument runs like this: Christianity, founded by God himself, could
not tolerate or accept faiths espoused by mere mortals. Thus,
superimposed on the “white man’s burden” of civilizing the
world, Christianity brought a religious zeal to save the world and
exterminate the obstinate “infidels.” Neither the faiths
preceding it, such as Judaism, nor a faith following it denying
Christ's divinity is acceptable to the white Western mind. It
was Christianity, not Islam, which invented the trigger phrases of: Infidel
- Holy War - Fundamentalism. And it was Israel that first introduced
terrorism in the form of car bombing and airplane hijacking into the
Middle East.
A
combination of Holocaust guilt and sympathy, and the birth of the
“strong” Western rich Jewish lobbyist, founded Israel for
European immigrants via the genocide and “ethnic cleansing” of
the “other, the colored, the infidel,” the invisible second
victims of the Holocaust. Ironically, Israel was founded due to
Christianity's “us vs. them” holocaust, and now thanks to
Israel, the “them du jour” are Muslims. From its founding,
Israel's leaders such as David Ben Gurion, Yitzhak Rabin, and Shimon
Peres identified “Islam” as the true enemy of Israel, and now by
extension to Israel's colony - the United States.
With
the entry of the naive, isolated, gullible U.S. government into
Mideast politics after World War II, Israel cleverly formulated a
strategy to win “America's money, weapons, vetoes, and blind
support” through the only educational and opinion molding medium
the West understands: the media, with its film power of Images
and Words.
America's
politics became hostage to Israel, Jewish political activism and
campaign donations, and a media and Hollywood powerhouse all
designed to wield the “carrot and stick.” While the rest of
America was self-centered on “me”, Israel's influence around
Washington D.C. became a belt encircling the power centers of
government much akin to the physiologic blood brain barrier of the
brain that filters harmful compounds and allows entry of only
pro-Israeli messages. Hence, the creation of America's split
personality and erratic foreign policy that is often embarrassing,
humiliating, stupid, irrational, and dangerous, to America's long
term interest in the world; America's national interest
logically lies with 56 Muslim nations, a fifth of the world's market
population with 60% of the world's oil reserves, YET America's
cowardly, greedy, short-sighted pandering to one nation - Israel -
may ultimately lead to America's definitive war and American deaths
within the Muslim world.
 |
|
Bernard
Lewis |
Given
America's impotence toward Israel, as clearly articulated by Bush's
silence and Powell's “Blame Arafat for Israel's 53-year murder and
occupation of Palestine, for Sharon's military madness, and for
forcing us to look cowardly,” what have Arab leaders done to solve
the Palestinian Diaspora and regain world respect for Arabs? In
a word: NOTHING. In fact, American impotence is only
superseded by Arab impotence, dishonesty, inter-Arab conflict,
undemocratic and inhumane self-survival policies, wasted time,
lives, money, and resources, all while living a hypocritical image
of true Islam.
For
53 years the Arab and Muslim world did not, and could not, develop
one single strategy to counteract Israel's hegemony of America and
Europe. How shameful it is to hear U.S. officials say that Arab
leaders say one thing in private while denouncing Israel in public. Islam
has been shredded in the Western media as a faith of violence,
terrorism, and intolerance. Yet not one leader has stood up to the
American-Israeli hegemony with faith, courage, and the trust of his
people.
America
is a capitalistic society that responds to money and power
regardless of politics. Israel has the financial and political
power to wield its influence via the Congress and the Media. Both
are money dependent. Recently, it was reported that thousands
of Saudi Arabian princes, alone, have between $500 billion and one
trillion dollars in American banks and government bonds. That's
just one family. Imagine if the Arab and Muslim world would
adopt a two-pronged strategy: one politico-financial, the other
cultural.
Imagine
if Muslim money and resources were wielded as political power via
American banks and financial institutions, stocks in major companies
including advertising firms, stocks in media corporations even
beginning with local markets, stocks in Hollywood production
companies, supporting and strengthening Arab and Muslim political
action committees with a presence in every state to lobby for
Arab/Muslim causes, establishing Islamic institutes and centers in
universities, scholarships for Arab/Muslim students in
Communication/Media/Film studies, hiring or developing professional
public relations firms on behalf of Islam and the Muslim victims in
Palestine, India, Kashmir, Chechnya, Afghanistan, China, Burma,
Philippines and so on. The Business of America is Business, yet
Arabs act as if that’s none of their Business until they are
forced to meet and whine about the “injustice” to Arabs and
Muslims and how great Islam was instead of how great Islam is and
will always be.
Secondly,
the need to develop a strategy to reach the American people at the
grassroots media and cultural level. Americans are not Islam's
enemy. They are a kind, generous, open-minded people who seek
to live in peace and are thirsty to for others to reach out to them
and inform them of their world and culture. Currently, even
American Muslims are silent, intimidated, fearful and ignorant
regarding political activism. Education and training for them is
needed urgently. Today, Muslim schools and mosques serve
Muslims, but not Islam.
For
their part, the 56 Muslim nations need to develop a unified
organization for the sole purpose of informing Americans and
Europeans on the truth of Islam via media, film, and cultural events
in museums, colleges, and film. There is not one single entity in
the U.S. that performs this function with any professionalism and
effectiveness. A coordinated effort, even state-by-state, that
brings Muslims together with pride, joy, and trust among themselves
will alter the landscape of the West. Americans and Europeans are
converting to Islam despite Muslims, not because of them.
A
short-term strategy of pressuring the U.S. that its interests are in
jeopardy in the Muslim world will bring the peace process back on
track. America has been looking to invest its interests and energy
policies beyond the Middle East such as in the Caspian Sea, so the
timeframe to influence American policy is short. If Americans
can learn to love the Germans, the Italians, and the Japanese, and
accept Russians and Chinese as strategic friends, surely Muslim
lands can do the same given that the only wedge between Muslims and
the Christian West is Israel.
 |
|
Samuel
P. Huntington |
The
first strategy is to make clear that no attack on Iraq is
acceptable, and that the Arab League will resolve the issue of the
weapons inspectors. Second, suspend the Arab League Peace Plan and
recall Arab and Muslim ambassadors from the U.S. and England until
Sharon withdraws immediately from all Palestinian Authority areas.
Third, insist on a U.N.-sponsored International Conference on the
Palestinian-Israeli issue and on defining “terrorism.” America
needs the 56 Muslim nations more than Muslims need
them.
Will
the Arabs ever manifest such courage and spine? It’s hard to
believe. If they don't, however, then surely their political
survival and U.S. interests will suffer in the long term for one
simple reason: neither the U.S., nor the Arab/Muslim world, nor the
United Nations have the courage to stand up to Israel and say enough
is enough.
Interesting
Relevant Quotes:
1.
St. Petersburg Times, Florida: March 17, 2002
“Most
troubling is that the Egyptian press continues to promote hatred and
violence against Israel and, frankly, America,” says Morton Klein,
president of the Zionist Organization of America. “As we now
understand full well, the media can really create a culture of
hatred and violence.”
2.
-- George Kennan, US Cold War planner, 1948 (John Pilger,
Hidden Agendas, (The New Press, 1998), p.59)
“We have 50 per cent of the world's wealth, but only 6.3 per cent
of its population. In this situation, our real job in the coming
period is to devise a pattern of relationships which permit us to
maintain this position of disparity. To do so, we have to dispense
with all sentimentality… we should cease thinking about human
rights, the raising of living standards and democratization.”
3.The
Independent: March 30, 2002 Robert Fisk: “The lies leaders tell
when they want to go to war.”
“How
much longer can the Americans remain so gutlessly silent in the face
of a vicious conflict which is coming close to obscuring the crimes
against humanity of 11 September?”
4.
Now we have an Israeli officer – according to the Israeli daily
Ma'ariv – advising his men to study the tactics adopted by the
Nazis in the Second World War. “If our job is to seize a densely
packed refugee camp or take over the Nablus casbah, and if this job
is given to an (Israeli) officer to carry out without casualties on
both sides, he must before all else analyze and bring together the
lessons of past battles, even – shocking though this might appear
– to analyze how the German army operated in the Warsaw ghetto.”
|