 |
|
U.S.-U.K.
companies eye rebuilding the shambles they have caused
|
LONDON,
March 29 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – U.K. British
construction companies are lobbying with their government to secure
contracts in a post-war Iraq reconstruction.
According
to a report published by the Financial Times on Saturday, March
29, more than 80 British companies plan to meet under the umbrella of
the British Consultants and Construction Bureau with U.K. government
officials early next month in the strongest attempt yet to ensure that
non-U.S. contractors win a share of the $1.9bn (£1.2bn) earmarked for
rebuilding Iraq.
The
paper said that initial contracts were expected to be awarded to a
shortlist of U.S. firms.
"This
appears to have been delayed by the slow progress of fighting and
controversy over links between U.S. companies and members of the Bush
administration," the paper said.
It
added that British companies "expect to play a bigger role in
infrastructure work" but that "concerns are likely to be
raised by the possibility of the Pentagon attempting to ban
international companies who are investing in Iran's energy sector from
participating in the reconstruction of Iraq."
In
another article, the paper quoted private-sector sources closes to the
U.S. Defense Department as saying that the Pentagon is "drawing
up a blacklist of non-U.S. companies investing in Iran's energy sector
with a possible view to barring them from U.S.-awarded contracts in
the reconstruction of neighboring Iraq."
"The
companies on the draft list include several from countries within the
U.S.-led 'coalition of the willing', such as oil companies Shell of
the U.K. and Italy's Eni. TotalFinaElf of France is also listed,"
reported the paper, adding that a Pentagon spokesman declined to
comment on the blacklist.
To
do that, the Pentagon is planning to apply, for the first time, the
Iran-Libya Sanctions Act, passed in 1996 and renewed in 2001, to list
the companies breaching this act.
This
means that sanctions will be imposed on the non-U.S. companies
investing more than $20m a year in the energy sectors of the two
countries, designated by the U.S. as sponsors of terrorism, the paper
said.
"The
European Union says the act, passed in 1996 and renewed in 2001, is in
breach of international trade rules. To date, the law has not been
applied," said the paper.
The
Financial
Times
quoted an analyst of Iran-U.S. relations saying that the
putting the Act in action would "kill two birds with one
stone", by putting pressure on Iran and helping U.S. companies.
It
quoted Stuart Doughty, chief executive of U.K. construction group
Costain, as saying: "Someone somewhere will have to rebuild the
country. It is only natural that those countries who have
played a part in bringing Iraq back to normality should take the
lead."
The
paper also quoted a U.K. company as asserting that if the U.N. is
involved in the post war reconstruction of Iraq, then contracts will
be won by low-cost bidders from countries outside the coalition of the
willing.
"It
complained that French and German companies secured most of the
infrastructure contracts in Kosovo despite heavier military commitment
from the UK," the paper said.