LONDON,
March 27 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) - The U.S. and British
occupation forces in southern Iraq are locking horns over the most
appropriate military strategies, reporters embedded with the occupation
forces said.
The
divisions were reported after the invaders sustained gross damage and
fatalities as the war entered its eighth day, Al-Quds Press news agency
reported Thursday, March 27.
The
reporters said talks about harmony and mutual coordination between the
Anglo-American occupation forces in the military operations are just a
façade and propaganda to reassure the weary American and British public
opinion.
"Two
British officers are really disturbed by the way the Americans are
running the battles, which are aimed at gaining a hasty victory due to
the political and media pressures exercised on them nowadays," a
BBC Kuwaiti reporter said.
"The
U.S. officers keep on saying: Baghdad…Baghdad…Baghdad, which asserts
that they want to rush headlong towards the Iraqi capital as soon as
possible to leave the impression that the war is advancing by leaps and
bounds, heroic achievements are being materialized and that the Iraqi
regime will shortly become history," he added.
The
reporter said British troops are making their way into southern Iraq
carefully and cautiously, fearing that the rush of the U.S. troops
towards Baghdad will leave a number of other cities behind them for the
Iraqi fighters.
U.S.
Strategy Lowers Iraqi Morale
However,
some analysts argue that the U.S. hasty strategy is aimed at lowering
the morale of the Iraqi fighters given that if they succeeded in taking
control of Baghdad, they would easily capture other cities and avoid
Iraqi war of attrition.
Militarily
speaking, the U.S. strategy, in effect, is risky.
The
hasty pace of the U.S. deployment along vast swathes of Iraqi
territories would not help the U.S. occupation troops secure their
logistics and ammunition supplies.
They,
in addition, will be vulnerable to hit-and-run attacks from the Iraqi
resistance fighters.
The
U.S. strategy is reflected in the words of its Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld, who keeps saying that the American forces are pushing deep
into the Iraqi territories.
U.S.
President George W. Bush also told the families of the U.S. soldiers in
Iraq Wednesday, March 26, that the U.S. troops had advanced some 200
miles into the Iraqi territories.
Analysts
say that the division on the war front also left its marks on the U.S.
and U.K. political landscape and would overshadow British Prime Minister
Tony Blair’s meeting with Bush in Camp David.
The
analysts are not suggesting that the division between both leaders would
come to surface.
They,
however, expect that the heavy losses sustained by the invading troops
would make such division public.
The
analysts cited, in this respect, that U.S. and British commanders gave
conflicting information in several incidents.
While
the U.S. military sources said Tuesday, March 25, that two British tanks
fired at each other, killing two soldiers, the British said that it was
a U.S. tank which fired at British tanks.