 |
|
Indians
denounce U.S. occupation of Iraq
|
By
IOL South Asia Correspondent
NEW
DELHI, March 22 (IslamOnline.net) - Hours before a crucial meeting of
leaders of all political parties Saturday, March 22, the mood in the
Indian capital was one of resentment against the unprovoked and
unjustifiable aggression against Iraq.
However,
the all-party meeting convened by Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee
to discuss the Iraq crises failed to agree on a joint resolution. The
Vajpayee government has rejected Opposition charge that it was
hesitating to directly condemn the U.S. for the military action.
"There
was no consensus on the formulation" for such a resolution,
External Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha told reporters after a
two-hour meeting attended by leaders of the Indian political parties
including Congress Party president Sonia Gandhi.
While
the Opposition insisted on using the word "condemn" for the
military action by United States and its allies, the Government did
not favor it, leaders of various political leaders said later.
The
Prime Minister, who summed up the discussions, clearly stated that
India saw no justification for this military action and that the war
was avoidable, Foreign Minister Yashwant Sinha said.
Vajpayee
made it clear that "there was no question of endorsing the
military action which has been started against Iraq", Sinha said
adding that "Government of India is not in favor of war. So it is
not in favor of continuation of war…the humanitarian issue including
the suffering of the Iraqi people "is something which has caused
deep anguish to us and others".
Later
dozens of prominent opposition leaders, including RJD Party chief
Laloo Prasad Yadav and Communist Party (Marxist) general secretary
Harkishan Singh Surjeet, today courted arrest after staging a
demonstration close to the US embassy here against the American attack
on Iraq. As usual, the leaders were released soon afterwards.
Laloo
Prasad, a former chief minister of the state of Bihar, later told
media persons that "the Vajpayee government was afraid of the US
and therefore did not want to condemn the American attack against
Iraq".
The
demonstration was held as a part of a call given by Left-backed
central trade unions and some opposition parties to launch massive
protests all over the country to demand immediate halt to the war and
ask the Government to unambiguously condemn the U.S. occupation.
Even
as the federal government continued to take a “balanced” stance,
political parties across the spectrum were convinced that the U.S.
aggression was one of a piece with its earlier attacks on Korea,
Vietnam, Kampuchea, Granada and Panama, to name a few.
India
as a country had invariably objected to these acts in the past. Even
the present federal government, the softest ever on the U.S., could
not bring itself round to accepting the unjustified war.
When
President George W. Bush called Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee
Thursday, March 20, Vajpayee made it clear that India did not think
the sidelining of the UN was proper. Although he refrained from
criticizing the U.S., Vajpayee did not endorse the attack either.
People
close to the federal government feel this is the utmost that India can
do. In a situation when seven Arab neighbors of Iraq are allowing U.S.
air bases in their countries for attacks on Iraq, India can’t be
expected to catch the bull by the horn, they said.
All
Iraq's neighbors, except Syria, are providing logistic support to the
U.S. forces, observers said. Former diplomat G Parthasarthy, an
influential foreign policy analyst of the Establishment, said that
even the U.S. Central Command of General Franks was operating from the
Gulf.
Because
of the uncertainty in the Arab countries themselves, India may not
like to put its growing ties with the US and Israel at risk.
Thursday’s call from Bush to Vajpayee was the second in a week. The
U.S. seems to understand India’s position well and has not been
pressing for more.
However,
opposition political parties may not be as circumspect. Sonia Gandhi,
president of the largest and oldest political party in India,
Congress, minced no words when she said Friday, March 21, that the
Iraq war could cause irreversible harm to the UN, the rule of
international law, and fraternity of nations.
Expressing
solidarity with Iraq’s people, she said they were being penalized
for no fault of theirs. Gandhi, who was speaking at the fourth Rajiv
Gandhi Environment Lecture in New Delhi, said, “Such a war, flying
in the face of world public opinion and against the wishes of a
majority of governments, will affect not just our physical
environment, but has gravely damaged the foundations of orderly
international life.”
Meanwhile,
the Iranian president’s special envoy Ali Akbar Vilayati brought a
letter to Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee from President Mohammad
Khatami Friday, March 21. The Foreign Office here did not divulge the
contents of the letter but said it was regarding the Iraq crisis.
Vilayati,
a former foreign minister of Iran, had talks with the prime minister.
He also met foreign minister Yashwant Sinha to exchange views on the
Iraq situation.
Vailayati
was in Pakistan Friday, March 21, and met President Pervez Musharraf.
Iran is said to be perturbed over the prospect of a pro-U.S. regime in
Iraq after Saddam Hussein, with whom it never saw eye to eye. Iran
which is Evil No.2 in US scheme of things (after Iraq), is not happy
about the developments in the neighborhood.