 |
|
“Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours,” Bush
|
By
Tarik Hamdi, IOL Washington Correspondent
WASHINGTON,
March 18 (IslamOnline.net) – U.S. President George Bush early
Tuesday, March 18 (01:00 GMT), issued an ultimatum to Saddam and his
sons to leave Iraq within 48 hours as the only way left to save their
country from destruction and war.
The
American President, whose 13-minute speech was rooted in his doctrine
of pre-emption, declared that the U.S. had the ‘sovereign’
authority to declare war. The President, without naming France,
concluded that such an authority was invoked when a member of the UN
Security Council aborted the Anglo-American resolution that sought UN
authority for the steps that he announced today - the regime change.
In
offering his argument for pre-emption, Bush spoke about the future
possibilities that may accrue if Saddam was left to his own volition.
In order to further bolster claims to legitimacy of his decision, the
President utilized the ‘fighting terrorism’ theme, stating that
Saddam could pass along dangerous weapons to “terrorists”.
To
further highlight the terrorism aspect, Bush also put the homeland
defenses of the United States on a high "orange" alert
status, with additional security at air and seaports and other
critical facilities.
In
singling out Saddam and his sons, President Bush effectively indicated
that any member of the Baathist regime would be acceptable to him as
long as it fulfilled his desire of a “regime change” in Iraq. The
President sought to make the American public understand that Iraq
would not be an overnight affair but that the American goals would be
obtained over time.
In
his justification of going to war without UN mandate, the President
invoked ‘sovereign authority’ without any mention of the
‘legality’ crafted by the British Attorney General Lord Goldsmith,
who in a written parliamentary answer stated that the authority to use
force against Iraq stemmed from the combined effect of resolutions
678, 687 and 1441, is at best an enforced interpretation.
Instead
of commenting on the resolutions in question, he merely stated:
"All of these resolutions were adopted under Chapter VII of the
UN Charter which allows the use of force for the express purpose of
restoring international peace and security."
Bush
spoke about Saddam being threat to neighbors, indirectly implying
Israel. However, he did not single him out for actions against Iran or
the Kurds.
The
American President offering conciliatory terms to the Iraqi military
and bureaucracy asked them not to follow Saddam’s orders to destroy
oil wells or unleash weapons of mass destruction. In warning the
military against destroying oil installations, the President stated
that this source of wealth belongs to the Iraqi people. However, this
warning was also designed to assuage fears that oil supplies may be
affected, and so the economy.
Bush
was careful in avoiding the mention of an “Iraqi government” and
consistently talked about the regime. However, his singling out Saddam
and his two sons indicates that the definition of the regime may not
include other elements of the Saddam apparatus.
The
President, speaking on such an important issue, was brief and to the
point, which helped him avoid giving any details of his plan. Also, he
did not find it necessary to dilate in detail on any defense of his
argument of ‘sovereign authority’ and the right of pre-emption.
The
speech was not designed to cater to world opinion but to American
opinion alone as
he stated that duty to exercise this nation’s ‘sovereign
authority’ “fell to me as commander in chief by the oath that he
promised to keep”.
Click
Here for the Text of Bush Statement