 |
|
"Unilateralism on the Iraq issue would result in the United Nations being deeply scarred with disastrous consequences for the world order," Vajpayee
|
By
IOL South Asia Correspondent
NEW
DELHI, March 13 (IslamOnline.net) -
In a marked shift from its stated position, India seems to be
covertly supporting the United States in its looming military
aggression against Iraq. However, the Indian government is still
keeping an ambitious tone on the crisis.
Prime
Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee made a statement in Parliament
Wednesday, March 12, expressing grave concern and opposition to any
"unilateral military action" against Iraq.
"Unilateralism
on the Iraq issue would result in the United Nations being deeply
scarred with disastrous consequences for the world order. The
Government of India would strongly urge that no military action be
taken, which does not have the collective concurrence of the
international community," Vajpayee said.
"The
international community must take a very careful look both at the
objective of achieving Iraq's full compliance with U.N. resolutions
and at the means adopted to reach this goal.
"This
can be best achieved by a collective decision through the U.N. If
permitting more time and formulation of clearer criteria can
facilitate a decision within the U.N. framework, we believe this
option should be given a chance," the Prime Minister urged.
"Wrong"
Vajpayee
strongly opposed any move to change a country's regime by an outside
force and said India has drawn up contingency plans to deal with any
eventuality.
Replying
to clarifications from Opposition leaders on reports that the United
States wanted to remove Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, Vajpayee said
"Governments should be changed by the people and established by
them. Force should be allowed to change a regime."
"Use
of external force by a superpower to change a regime will be wrong and
this should not be supported," the Prime Minister said.
For
quite sometime, the United States had been trying to bring India
around to support its proposed military action against Iraq. In the
process it has offered India a role in post-Saddam Iraq.
President
George W. Bush recently talked to the Prime Minister over telephone
and is believed to have assured him of India's vital role in the
" economic reconstruction" of Iraq in the post-war phase.
The
US Ambassador to India, Robert Blackwill, in an interview to prominent
daily The Times of India, Tuesday, March 11, said,
" We hope that India has a major part to play and we have
conveyed that at very high levels."
"India,
with its very well-developed successful norms in civil society, had a
role to play in the construction of civil society in Iraq and economic
reconstruction. India had a comparative advantage over many countries
because of three factors: its vital civil society, its long term ties
with Iraq and the fact that India would be welcomed in that situation
where not every country would be welcomed," Blackwill told the
daily.
However,
another reputed newspaper The Asian Age, went today a
step further and exposed India's double standards on the issue.
"Neutral"
The
daily pointed out that India had finally given in to the intense U.S.
pressure and was unlikely to provide a steadfast support to Iraq in
the event of unilateral U.S. action.
India
has so far claimed to maintain " neutral stand" on the issue
saying it enjoyed good relations with both countries.
The
Asian Age, Wednesday, March 12, reported that India and the
United States "have reached an unofficial agreement on Iraq
wherein Washington can be assured there will be no opposition from New
Delhi in case of a war without United Nations' sanction.
"This
has been conveyed to Washington by senior leaders in the government
who have been in close touch with U.S. interlocutors and are
determined to express their solidarity by opposing a parliamentary
resolution against a war action on Iraq," read the paper.
"The
initial reluctance by the government to support the U.S. arguments has
been effectively worn down by Washington through a series of
high-level visits over the past several months. The BJP-led government
has decided that it will one, oppose the war in principle, two,
advocate a UN route, and three, guard its own interests if and when
the war does break out," said the paper.
"India
has been assured that its oil interests in the region will be
protected with the Bush administration and strategic advisers to the
government insisting on the wisdom of keeping several options in the
American basket rather than sinking all through a misconceived support
for Iraq and peace," it added.
"Better
Sense"
The
Indian government' s stand on the issue dismayed the opposition
parties. They alleged the federal government is not coming clean on
the issue. It had not been forthcoming in making a clear-cut statement
that it is opposed to a war on Iraq and would like the weapons
inspectors to be given more time.
The
Congress stated that the U.S. as the sole power has created an
exceptionally grave situation on Iraq and that only the people of a
country (Iraq) have a right to effect regime change.
Congress
Party president Sonia Gandhi expressed these views at the all-party
meeting held on Monday when she said "We can think of no similar
crisis in the last 55 years. Even at this late hour, we hope that
better sense would prevail and the international community in its
collective wisdom as represented by the U.N. Security Council will be
able to bring about peaceful disarmament of Iraq without recourse to
war."
Congress
Party spokesman S Jaipal Reddy said on Tuesday that the Congress was
opposed to war without U.N. mandate as it would weaken the UN.
The
government has also stated that it seeks peaceful resolution of the
conflict. However, the party refused to condemn the U.S. actions.
The
federal government's stated position to give a "principled
support" to Iraq remains doubtful.
In
an all-party meeting held on Monday, March 10, to discuss the Iraq
crisis, Prime Minister Vajpayee made it clear that his government
would not support any anti-war resolution in the Indian parliament,
which the opposition parties reportedly pressed for.
The
Prime Minister said that the U.S. and Iraq were friends of India, and
the government would not like to antagonize either at this stage.
During
the all-party meeting, at one stage the opposition parties tried to
corner the federal foreign minister Yashwant Sinha when he said "
Iraq is not blameless, it waged a war against Kuwait."
However,
parliamentarian and Communist Party leader Somnath Chaterjee,
countered Sinha and asked " Does this mean that a war against
Iraq is justified? Are you supporting it?" This sent the minister
into silence thereby indicating the federal government's ambiguous
stand on the issue.
Sanctions
Meanwhile,
reports from Washington said the U.S. slapped sanctions on Indian
company Protech Consultants Pvt Ltd for " knowingly and
materially contributing to Iraq's chemical and biological weapons
program."
The
penalties entail a ban on any contracts with the U.S. and ban on the
approval of licenses to import American goods. The sanctions, however,
do not extend to the company's country.
"We
do not see this issue as having an impact on U.S. relations with India
as we cooperate and work with the government because of our common
desire to halt proliferation of weapons of mass destruction,"
State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said Tuesday.
In
yet another development, Indian shipping companies expressed fears
that war surcharge would be imposed in the case of a conflict.
An
official of a top insurance company said the final decision has not
been taken, but in case the war breaks out there may be an imposition
of a war surcharge. This will be limited to the ships which may be
heading towards the Gulf or may pass through the war zone, he said.
A
Indian navy official said that in the event of the war, the merchant
fleet coming to India or leaving Indian ports would be guided by
Indian naval ships.
Meanwhile
India has advised its nationals in Iraq to leave that country. Due to
the imminent threat of war, Prime Minister Vajpayee has canceled his
scheduled visit to Syria and foreign minister Sinha has canceled his
visit to a number of European countries.