The
popular perception in the
US
is that
Iraq
is a country of uncivilized criminals and terrorists raised to
hate
America
because common people hate freedom and liberty, ragheads and
sand niggers who brought down the
Twin
Towers
in
New York City
and attacked the Pentagon. US-based columnists have taken to
calling Iraqis lazy and ungrateful. A few days ago, in a
prime-time press conference, US President George Bush said the
Iraqis must take control of their own destinies come June 30th.
The
fact that many of the kidnapped foreign workers were Pakistanis,
Bangladeshis and other Asians who used to drive cars and trucks
should get the message across that everyone is allowed a job in
Iraq
- except the Iraqis. Take Coalition Provisional Authority head
L. Paul Bremer who issued Order 39 (September 19), which
declares that 100 percent ownership of Iraqi banks, mines and
factories is allowed to be foreign-owned and 100 percent of
profits from these Iraqi institutions is allowed to be moved out
of the country. Where do Iraqis fit in? Is it any surprise they
feel cheated and robbed? Does a robbed man stand by and watch
his possessions dwindle?
This
is the ignorance that is supported, endorsed, encouraged and
tolerated by everyone from the Bush administration down to every
major news outlet in the
US
.
Take
for example the handling of the four Americans who were killed
in Fallujah, had their corpses burned, dismembered and then
hanged on a bridge. Every news outlet in the
US
spoke of the four heroic American “civilians.” Iraqis
butchered four decent, law-abiding civilians. Civilians who left
their families in helping to rebuild
Iraq
. That is the version the American public is given.
However,
the truth is that the four were former
US
soldiers in various capacities working as security agents for
North Carolina-based Blackwater Corp, which – among other
things – is charged with protecting L. Paul Bremer. Secondly,
it is no secret that many of the operations the
US
military used to undertake have now been slated for private
security firms like Blackwater. Effectively, they are hired help
- mercenaries. One of them was a Navy Seal, one of the most
decorated and highly-trained outfits in the
US
Military.
Missing
from the national (and international) discussion are the reports
which cited weapons found on the four slain men. Anyone who has
seen news footage of the private security firms running about in
Iraq
will immediately recognize that they are armed to the teeth,
wearing flak jackets. Initial reports said that the corpses were
wearing blue-colored flak jackets.
The
“civilians” theory doesn't hold much water.
In
fact, and unreported to US audiences, private security firms in
Iraq, much like Blackwater, are taking over major tasks and
operations primarily assigned to US forces. The hope is that US
forces remain in barracks, avoid improvised explosive devices
and ambushes, reduce the body count, and keep the
US
public firmly behind the war. In effect, private security firms
have become the de facto military presence in
Iraq
– vastly outnumbering the official count of Coalition forces.
If
the US Military is considered the occupying force in Iraq and is
replaced by what can be considered a mercenary force - bought
and paid for to undertake military duties - then the private
security firms become legitimate targets for a populace that
feels itself occupied and bound to resist.
And
that is precisely what several dozen clerics in
Iraq
and the Arab world said. They did not condemn the right to
attack the four armed men - remember, they were armed - but did
strongly condemn in unmistakable terms the mutilations and
public hangings that occurred later. Islamic law strictly
prohibits the maiming or disrespecting of any dead body, even
that of an animal. According to the Prophet Mohammed, even
spitting at a dead body - whether it is of an enemy or ally,
Jew, Christian, or Muslim is irrelevant - is considered
sacreligious. The Prophet routinely stood up in respect as the
funeral procession of Jews and Christians passed by his
domicile. However, this little tidbit about what is permissible
and prohibited in Islam was left out of US reporting.
A
full week after the killing of the four Blackwater employees,
more than 700 people have been killed in Fallujah. There
are more than 2,000 wounded civilians. More than 147 houses have
been entirely destroyed. Four mosques have been damaged. Doctors
are running out of vital supplies. The city is under siege, cut
off from food, water, and medicine supplies. “We are resorting
to collective punishment,” Newsweek editor Fareed Zakaria told
Chris Matthews on Hardball recently. He denied the official
US
position that fighters in the “Sunni Triangle” are
dead-enders. He also claimed uneven-handedness in
Iraq
was feeding the “insurgency.”
Punitive
collective punishment of this kind is reminiscent of German Nazi
policies during the occupation of
France
. Take for example the German Nazi response in the French town
of
Tulle
in 1944. History shows that French Resistance had seized the
town of
Tulle
from the German 3rd Battalion and 95th Security Regiment. When
the Das Reich Panzer Division retook the town, they found 64
badly-mutilated German bodies. Revenge would come swiftly: The
SS-Panzer Aufklarungs Abteilung 2 platoon seized 99 men and
promptly executed them, later hanging their bodies as a sign to
others. Some 100 civilians who were deported to concentration
camps would die in
Germany
.
To
the Germans, the civilians were “insurgents and terrorist
sympathizers”; to the rest of the world, they were civilians. For
its part, the French resistance fighters were not called
terrorists; they were called La Resistance (the resistance) and
adopted a near mythical, if not legendary, status in European
history.
As
civilian casualties escalate into the hundreds, US Military
commanders, hoping to save face in
Iraq
and the Arab World, have started to accuse the defenders of
Fallujah of hiding behind women and children. That statement
flies in the face of video footage shot by Al Jazeera and
carried on ABC, CBS, MSNBC, and NBC clearly showing Iraqi
fighters running between streets, in trenches, atop buildings,
firing their RPGs and automatic weapons. No women and children
in sight.
When
a large convoy of aid supplies carrying blood for hospital
transfusions, food, and water managed to break through a
US
military roadblock, the media called it a delivery of aid to
Sunni rebels. Missing from the report were mentions of doctors
feeling overwhelmed and ill-equipped to deal with the growing
death toll and the number of civilians facing a humanitarian
crisis due to lack of drinkable water and unspoiled food
(Fallujah was dependent on shipments from the rest of Iraq).
On
April 12, as Arab journalists (including Iraqi journalists)
pressed the Coalition to comment on civilian deaths in
Fallujah
,
US
General Mark Kimmit refused to acknowledge that it was civilians
who were killed.
US
Media swallowed it hook, line and sinker with MSNBC reporting
“
U.S.
officials say about 700 insurgents and 70
coalition troops have been killed since April 1, but Iraqi
civilian toll is unclear.” Despite persistent reports from Al
Jazeera and other Arab media, despite the graphic pictures of
women and children cut to pieces, despite the angry wails of
hospital staff and appeals for humanitarian assistance, US media
is refusing to toe anything but the official government line.
Isn’t
that how the fabrications, reliance on unreliable defectors, and
other misconceptions about
Iraq
’s WMD were propagated in the first
place? What of the Iraq-Al Qaeda link, which has since been
debunked? Was it not US media that reported every “official”
word coming out of the Bush administration and various
Washington
think-tanks as gospel?
Why?
Racism
is the answer. There is an arrogance in the West that everything
Western is superior, exemplary and ideal for all cultures. In
2002, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Belusconi said that Islamic
culture was inferior to the advanced Western civilization. This
school of thought is prevalent throughout every sector of
US
society and has been nudged on by the
various “hate-films” that
Hollywood
churns every year. Arabs are portrayed as
stupid, animalistic, ammoral, sex-starved, abusing,
wife-battering terrorists who seek to kill themselves - and
their children - so that they can languish with 72 virgins in
heaven. That Arabs saved Western civilization by translating the
Greek philosophies and complementing them, introducing algebra,
geometry and astronomy to
Europe
is left out. That the first medical
institute in world history was established in - wait for it -
southern
Iraq
by the Muslims is also lost on the
US
public.
It
is no surprise then when
we hear that British commanders in
Iraq
were condemning the Americans’ heavy-handed and
disproportionate military tactics in
Iraq
. According to The Telegraph's Sean Rayment, a British
officer, “who agreed to the interview on the condition of
anonymity, said that part of the problem was that American
troops viewed Iraqis as untermenschen - the Nazi expression for
‘sub-humans’.
“They
are not concerned about the Iraqi loss of life in the way the
British are. Their attitude towards the Iraqis is tragic, it's
awful.” The British officer accused the US Military of
targeting "terrorists" even if they are located in
densely-populated civilian areas: “They may well kill the
terrorists in the barrage but they will also kill and maim
innocent civilians. That has been their response on a number of
occasions. It is trite, but American troops do shoot first and
ask questions later. They are very concerned about taking
casualties and have even trained their guns on British troops,
which has led to some confrontations between soldiers,” The
Telegraph reported.
By
the way, if you weren’t around during the Nazi purging of
Europe
’s
Jews, untermenschen is the popular term a certain Adolf Hitler
used to express his disdain for what he termed the inferior Jews
in Mein
Kamp.
Consequently,
if the US Military, which can be considered the military hand of
the
US
government, considers Iraqis as inferior beings, it is then
academic to extrapolate that US lawmakers view Iraqis as lesser
peoples. Perhaps that helps explain why the Bush administration
is so irked by news reports showing dead Iraqi women and
children. Perhaps it helps explain why he accuses Arab media –
including Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya – of being propagandists
and liars. Perhaps it also explains why every Iraqi protestation
in the last few years about lack of WMDs was shot down by
US
media and Iraqi officials were branded expert liars.
Perhaps,
it also explains why “the axis of evil” slogan was so
popular with
Washington
neocons. Inferior people are considered satanic and evil. After
all, was this not how slavery was maintained and thrived in the
continental US in the 17th, 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries? Were
not the slaves considered by white (supremacist) landowners to
be cursed by God, soulless and would never see the gates of
heaven? Was this not how Apartheid was allowed to survive in the
heart of black
Africa
?
Racism.
The same racism that allowed 800,000 Rwandan Hutus and Tutsis to
die exactly 10 years ago while the so-called compassionate
superpower focused on twiddling their thumbs. The same racism
that refused to apologize for centuries of slavery at the Durban
Conferences in
South
Africa
on
September
8, 2001
.
Zakaria
put it best when he told Matthews how Iraqis must feel: “We
lost four on our side and they lost 700. What do you think that
tells them? That their lives are not nearly as important?”
Touché.
Firas
Al-Atraqchi is a Canadian journalist of Iraqi
heritage. Holding an MA in Journalism and Mass Communication, he
has eleven years of experience covering
Middle East
issues, oil and gas markets, and the telecom industry. You
can reach him at firascape@hotmail.com.