Your Mail

ÚÑÈí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 



Critiques and Thought | Islamic Themes | Human Condition & Social Context | Scientific Domain | Interfaith, Intercivilizational & Intercultural | Interviews, Reviews and Events


Newsweek & the Qur’an:
Recycling Nihilism on Paperback and the Territorial Intellectual Machine

By IOL Editorial Staff

05/08/2003

Newsweek's Article

One can effortlessly dismiss the whole issue at hand by one stroke of pity (to Newsweek) for publishing such jargon and what it all is. “Challenging the Qur’an”, a second-rate article published in Newsweek (religious sentiment aside, a lousy title, not to mention the length, depth, specialization and intensity of such a ‘challenge’), July 28th 2003, can just go to the dustbin of history, as many other pseudo-intellectual works-whatever their subject is.

It is a pity that Newsweek, or the writer, is not aware of the problems of Orientalism, its thematic and canonical defects, along with its intrinsic position in the intellectual project of modernity, along with its power discourse. Not recognizing the (long-arrived at) moral, and epistemological (concerning the theory of knowledge) sicknesses in the Western paradigm of ‘modernity’ is yet another pity.

This is nothing new. We have seen polemicists’ smiles before, showing the color of their teeth by the default of stretching the muscles of their visage after a face-lift. Proverbial Islamophobia is not a ‘secular’ product (and ironically, that of freedom of religion). It is a wholesale business that is controlled by the laws of supply and demand in the publishing market. One can even blame it all, which is a human concern with spread of publication production-that which made, sometimes, rubbish intellectualized and printed. And this is a problem that concerns humanity and its intellectual journey.

As multiple as the levels of reactionism to this piece are, we do not believe, especially in cases like this, in refutation(s). There are more important things than pity. But just in case, and as the case will show different reactions (varying from emotional escapism, anger, petitions, and banning-as has already happened in Pakistan), we therein will, with all apology, present Newsweek’s article entitled, alas, “Challenging the Qur’an” and, amidst the haste, a reasonably unemotional ‘Response’ by Dr. Maher Hathout, a senior adviser to the Muslim Public Affairs Council and the spokesperson for the Islamic Center of Southern California. As reactions vary in intensity and form, Islam Online is also publishing an online ‘petition’ to Newsweek’s editor, a more heated, yet thoughtful re-action.

Dr. Maher Hathout

As our aim is to spread well-educated information, we, alongside these two essayists, would like to introduce to you what we recommend as a ‘must read’ in relation to the issue at hand, “Method against Truth; Orientalism and Qur’anic Studies” by eminent scholar and critic, Parvez Manzoor. His intriguing study on the Orientalist approach towards Qur’an and exposing its naked reality of frustration vengeance and confusion is a case in point.

Laughter is the best way to mock, be it an argument, belief, or a discourse. Coming from a ‘Western’ mouth, and subsequently affecting a readership, it is morbidly ironic that tolerance, pluralism, and even cultural relativism were all given a cold shoulder by a confused mind. And for that, that polemics can be intellectualized and marketed, we still hope to pave the path for a better world, a better world of cultural, moral, and intellectual understanding. We are not going to (mockingly) laugh, but we are not going to cry either. For there are more important interests than pity; if we apply a situational interchange of points and standpoints; if it was the “Western” in “Muslim” shoes, would that happen to him? Would the “Muslim” do the same to the Judeo-Christian Traditions? Would the “Western” accuse the Muslim of being racist, nihilist, and pathological? Then again, what do we have to do with pity?

Let secular fundamentalism-disguised under an agnostic face-be an intellectual authority; choose to discolor the canons of truth of the ‘Others’. Let rationalism-after its intellectual funeral-be the benchmark; then do not cry living life with a creed of doubt under a ‘materialistic’ wolf. Let animosity be the crowned princess of feeling; do not fear the ghosts of sectarian fanaticism.

Contemporary Issues


Critiques and Thought | Islamic Themes | Human Condition & Social Context | Scientific Domain | Interfaith, Intercivilizational & Intercultural | Interviews, Reviews and Events


Send Mail

Related Links

 

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Muslim Affairs | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map