Your Mail

ÚŃČí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 



Critiques and Thought | Islamic Themes | Human Condition & Social Context | Scientific Domain | Interfaith, Intercivilizational & Intercultural | Interviews, Reviews and Events


Globalization, Multi-lateralism and the Islamic World

By Mohammad El-Sayed Selim

Professor of Political Science, Egypt

09/01/2003

An Assessment of the Multi-lateral Responses of the Islamic World to Globalization

The Islamic world has responded to the globalizing changes at inward-oriented and outward-oriented levels. At the first level the OIC, the main inter-governmental institution of the Islamic world brought about some significant changes in its agenda and attempted to establish a dialogue with the West. Some governmental and non-governmental institutions were established, such as the Developing-8 Group, and the World Populist Islamic Command. Finally, at the second level, some Islamic states joined other multi-lateral globalizing institutions with a view of benefiting from them.

Although these achievements have increased the ability of the Islamic world to cope partially with some aspects of globalization, they have not been effective in bringing about a qualitative change in such ability. This is essentially because of various variables, (i) the Islamic world is not a homogeneous entity. It is divided along virtually all socio-economic and political lines of comparison including religious ones. It lacks a center of gravity that could define the main courses of action, (ii) the Islamic world is deeply penetrated by powers of globalization. The economies and security models of the Islamic world are mostly influenced by the agenda of the Western powers, (iii) the weakness of most of state institutions of many Muslim countries, limit their ability to comprehend global changes and their impacts on them, save for devising strategies to deal with them. This is essentially because; all Islamic states are newly independent states, and the economies of most of them are quite weak and (iv) rivalries and conflicts among Islamic states over regional leaderships, and territorial issues. This variable is acutely clear in the case of the Islamic states in West Asia.

In judging the performance of the Islamic countries, one must take into consideration these variables, and more importantly, the fact that most of the Islamic countries have gained independence after the Second World War. One cannot compare the performance of the Islamic countries with that of the European countries. In the area of integration as the latter have a three centuries of history behind them in state building and development.

Nevertheless, the Islamic countries can enhance their ability to deal with the forces of globalization by upgrading their multi-lateral institutions, namely the OIC along the lines mentioned earlier. The Islamic world needs to think about establishing multi-lateral security regimes, and strengthening its conflicts resolving mechanisms. Linkages between various Islamic multi-lateral institutions should be established. There is nothing in principle against the multiplicity of institutions. The main problem is not multiplicity, but competition, which could lead to the canceling out of the achievements of one institution by the actions of another. One should think about modalities of relations between the OIC and D-8 Group. The Islamic countries also need to develop their paradigm for civilizational dialogue and expand the dialogue to include all Islamic countries. In this respect, the attack on Islamic and Asian (virtually all non-Western) values deserves significant attention from Islamic multi-lateral institutions.

The Islamic world does not need more multi-lateral institutions to enhance its ability to cope with globalization. What is needed in the commitment to energizing the present institutions, coordinate their activities, and assess the correlates of the success of other multi-lateral institutions, such as the ASEAN in which Islamic states are represented. What also is needed is to attempt. In this area, Malaysia can serve as a link between ASEA and the Islamic countries by communicating the successful models adopted in ASEAN to the Islamic world. Finally, Islamic countries need to coordinate their efforts to face the tremendous task of reforming global multi-lateral institutions and steering them towards serving its interests.


Mohammad El-Sayed Selim is a Professor of Political Science, Director of the Center for Asian studies, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. 
E-mail: mohammedselim@hotmail.com

Contemporary Issues


Critiques and Thought | Islamic Themes | Human Condition & Social Context | Scientific Domain | Interfaith, Intercivilizational & Intercultural | Interviews, Reviews and Events


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map