|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread: Redefining Our Womanhood
 |
This thread is locked - replies are not allowed.
|
|
 |
|
|
Replies:
76
-
Last Post:
Aug 11, 2008 9:32 AM
by: Naila
|
|
Posts:
42
Registered:
6/13/06
|
|
|
|
Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 6, 2007 3:48 AM
|
|
I am increasingly disconcerted by the way in which everybody (Muslims and non-Muslims) else is telling us what to wear, what to do, how to do it and who to do it for. I foudn the following and I would like to know how everyone else sees the situation. "Zouha writes: Unveiling the Muslim woman of her headscarf was one of the colonizer's great challenges: a means of validating his superiority and civilising mission that consisted of the 'emancipation' of the Muslim woman, whilst at the same time elevating the model of the Western lifestyle, which the indigenous population was supposed to assimilate. As Edward Said has pointed out, the colonial education system played a major role in assimilation: 'For Barrès, the essence of France is most visible in French schools; thus he says of a school in Alexandria: "it's charming to see these little oriental girls welcoming and reproducing so vividly the imagination and the melody of the French Isle".' This influence bore fruit, given that it educated an elite, which knew how to defend, and still defends, the interests of the West in the Arab countries. That elite has retained the Western model as a reference point well after independence, simultaneously disdaining and disregarding the Arab-Muslim tradition, perceived to be a disruptive and restraining force in the process of social evolution and the emancipation of women". Does anyone read what's going on the way I do? When did our bodies become a vehicle for politics without us the possesors of our bodies?
|
|
 |
Posts:
27
Registered:
12/4/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 7, 2007 6:03 AM
in response to:
Ubuntu
|
|
You are right ubunto. Many see the woman's veil as a form of resistance and turn it into a political issue. That's why there's all this attack on veil I guess. They make it seem as if a veiled woman is not a woman anymore or too shy of her femininity but it's not the case.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 7, 2007 11:31 AM
in response to:
Ubuntu
|
|
Hi Ubuntu, It seems to me that the question you should be asking yourself is, should an Islamic woman draw attention to herself, by her dress, when in a culture different from her own? From what I understand, a woman should not cause herself to be the subject of attention. That is why women are told not to wear perfume, because it could cause a man notice her. A woman should not expose her arms, legs and hair because it would also draw attention to herself and cause a man to look at her. Likewise, makeup would draw attention to her beauty, causing her to be noticed by strangers. But when a woman is in a different culture and is wearing something that is strange to that culture, such as an Islamic headscarf or burka, the very thing she wears to reduce being noticed, actually causes attention to be drawn to her. I know where I live, if a woman wore a long dress with long sleeves and a headscarf, everyone would notice her, simply because it is unusual. I understand the delimma, but if I were to visit a culture different from my own, I would try my best to blend in by wearing clothing that is appropriate to the culture...I would not want to be the object of stares. If the culture dictated that women wear a Shalwar Kameez, I would wear it. Or if it is a place where women wear Babushkas, that is what I would wear. I would try to blend in as much as possible and not be noticed as a stranger or outsider. When you are in a place where women do not cover their hair and you choose to wear an Islamic headscarf, it is equivalent to loudly proclaiming, "May I have your attention please! I am a Muslim woman and I don't want you to see my hair." Which seems to me just the opposite of what you wish to accomplish when you wear your headscarf, or burka. Even when you put politics aside, when you wear Islamic clothing in a non-Islamic culture, you will actually accomplish what you are trying to avoid. Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
27
Registered:
12/4/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 15, 2007 1:31 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Although cultural differences should have their consequences as you say Rosa, still the issue of attention is controversial. There's a difference between calling the attention to yourself, with all due respect, and calling attention to your beauties and charms as a woman.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
26
Registered:
3/18/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 18, 2007 7:24 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Hi Ubuntu, It seems to me that the question you should be asking yourself is, should an Islamic woman draw attention to herself, by her dress, when in a culture different from her own? From what I understand, a woman should not cause herself to be the subject of attention. That is why women are told not to wear perfume, because it could cause a man notice her. A woman should not expose her arms, legs and hair because it would also draw attention to herself and cause a man to look at her. Likewise, makeup would draw attention to her beauty, causing her to be noticed by strangers. But when a woman is in a different culture and is wearing something that is strange to that culture, such as an Islamic headscarf or burka, the very thing she wears to reduce being noticed, actually causes attention to be drawn to her. I know where I live, if a woman wore a long dress with long sleeves and a headscarf, everyone would notice her, simply because it is unusual. I understand the delimma, but if I were to visit a culture different from my own, I would try my best to blend in by wearing clothing that is appropriate to the culture...I would not want to be the object of stares. If the culture dictated that women wear a Shalwar Kameez, I would wear it. Or if it is a place where women wear Babushkas, that is what I would wear. I would try to blend in as much as possible and not be noticed as a stranger or outsider. When you are in a place where women do not cover their hair and you choose to wear an Islamic headscarf, it is equivalent to loudly proclaiming, "May I have your attention please! I am a Muslim woman and I don't want you to see my hair." Which seems to me just the opposite of what you wish to accomplish when you wear your headscarf, or burka. Even when you put politics aside, when you wear Islamic clothing in a non-Islamic culture, you will actually accomplish what you are trying to avoid. Rosa We wear the hijab because it's what Allah wants of us. We were not commanded to wear it only in countries that observe hijab and to avoid it in non-hijab-wearing-countries. It's to preserve modesty and not to conform to what people around us wear.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 19, 2007 7:15 PM
in response to:
MaisMuslimah
|
|
Hi MaisMuslimah, You wrote: "It's to preserve modesty..." I am all for preserving modesty! But there must be a certain amount of compromise if you go to a different culture where that sort of dress would be considered ostentatious. http://www.missionislam.com/family/hijab.htm The clothing of Muslim women should not be ostentatious. Ibn Umar reported that the Messenger of Allah (saws) said: He who dresses for ostentation in this world, Allah will dress him in a dress of humiliation on the Day of Judgment and set it on fire. I have mentioned before that most Muslim women in Bangladesh wear different clothing than your traditional Arabic dress. Women there wear traditional Indian-type clothing such as salwar kameez with an orna, or a sari. My daughter had a friend who moved to Bangladesh from an Arabic Muslim country. Although she was still a good Muslim, she took off her hijab in Bangladesh, because modest women there do not cover their hair, or feel the need to wear long sleeves (they wear lots of jewelry, and often have their nose pierced). But if she were to go back to an Arabic country, or to a Western country, her salwar kameez would be considered "ostentatious." Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
550
Registered:
11/27/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 30, 2007 5:52 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Hi Rosia_lia, I'm a US citizen and I live in the US now however I was raised in an Islamic area of the country of Indonesia. Have you yourself ever lived in an area that is prodominately Muslim? Have you ever lived in an area where the culture is prodominately different then your own? Have you ever tryed to keep your own standard in the face of people that differ from yourself? Not just in the area of dress. How about the area of what movies you let your childern watch? I know people who calm to be Christian that let their childern/teenagers watch R rated moves. Are going to let yours? How about put their 13 year old on birth control so they can have safe sex. Do let your 13 year old (or any child) have sex because some people who calm to be Christian do? I have seen you say that you are not trying to tell Muslim women what to wear. I see you trying to blame their religion for making them wear something that YOU think is uncomfortable. An interesting thing that is. Please tell the truth about what your purpose is. Do you really think that what you are doing will free these women from some HORRIBLE oppression? What women wear is not what oppresses them. A veil is no more or less oppressive then high heels. It is likely that a veil is way less oppressive then the US standard of being way to thin. Let me tell you what the most horrible oppression REALLY is. It is when one group of people think that they have the RIGHT to tell another what is modest or not. Thereby trying to neigate what others feel is God's standard. Do you really think that it matters if some women some place on the face of the earth says that they are Muslim and do not wear some form of the veil. IT DOESN'T MATTER. Do you what to know why it doesn't matter? I will tell you anyhow. EVER ONE is responsible before GOD for their own actions bases on what they believe and have found to be the true holy writings from God. Another thing be careful about trying to take away the rights of others because some day it might be your rights that are being taken away. until next time Ussarn
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
16
Registered:
12/15/05
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 27, 2007 2:25 AM
in response to:
ussarn
|
|
Salaamalykum . I am so delighted to read this post ,its beautifully written . Najmee .
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
3
Registered:
7/25/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jul 25, 2007 5:57 AM
in response to:
ussarn
|
|
Al salam Alikom, I support what Rosa say ,actually she is not saying anything wrong , and this is what happen when u visit some other countries , wearing hijab , or a mini skirt will get equal attencion, if we are talking about that only ,will be the same (attencion) only thought will be different and that doesnt conecern all people. people is so very busy nowdays working and trying to have a better life for their families. so calm down ,dont confuss the discussion. christianity has nothing to do with it.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
31
Registered:
7/16/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 27, 2007 6:01 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
rosa, what you wrote here seems to be very twisted to me, twisting the beauty of hijab as something that just gets unwanted attention. im american, rosa. and no matter how i dress i get attention. EVERyBODY does. so with that being said, you think a Muslim woman should expose herself in ways she finds to be uncomfortable or even sinfull, just caus she is somehow drawing attention to herself? EVERYBODY draws attention to themselves it is NATURAL. just by existing, and going out people look at you and see you, but that doesnt mean you have to dress how they would like to see you dress, or pander to their political schemes. rosa, you should be care full in what your saying,in that, well, if they are allowed to tell Muslim women how to dress, even making LAWS as to how Muslims can dress you think thats ok, caus ill tell you right now it is because YOU THINK THIS WILL NOT AFFECT YOU at all. but dear. do you really want that. to allow the govornment to be able to tell women what to wear or not wear? what if they say now that you can not wear bright green. or what if they say you can COVER your cleavage??? this is what you are talking as if Muslim women should do, rite? they should just expose themselves just to fit in? would you do that? would you expose your breasts if somebody told you that if you didnt do it you wouldnt fit it? if you support this atrocious act against some women, then trust me, you are also hurting yourself. i am an american Muslim, and i will NOT show my hair. i am just like every other american. FREE to dress how I want, and especially have the religious freedom(so far) to continue to practice my religion, alhamdulillah!!! if something is important to people, and they are not hurting others, then they should STICK by their principles. when people look at me in my hijab, sometimes they stare, SO WHAT? they get over it real quick. do ya get what im saying here?
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 28, 2007 9:45 AM
in response to:
TheREALBoris
|
|
Hi TheREALBoris, I am simply trying to figure out why women need to adopt an ancient Arabic custom of dress in order to please God. Nothing more. If a woman from a different culture than Arabic converts to Islam, you feel she must then begin to dress like Arabic women, and can no longer wear the clothing of her own culture. It has nothing to do with whether or not these women are dressing modestly to begin with. One poster, Sahara, called the modest dress of women in a non-Arabic culture "innovative" and said these women could not be real Muslims. I'm not telling YOU how to dress. It is you and your religion that is dictating how women should dress, saying it is immodest for a woman to allow someone to see her elbow, the back of her neck or a wisp of curl. Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
550
Registered:
11/27/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 9, 2007 8:33 PM
in response to:
Ubuntu
|
|
Redefining our womanhood? Redefining it by what we wear? I think that our womanhood is with in us, in our thoughts and actions, we show what is important features of who we are. Without a doubt how we feel about what we wear reflects greatly on how we understand ourself to be. If a woman, or anyone else for that matter, feels strongly about what they wear then they should by all means wear it. If a woman feels that a certian type of clothing is to show her love and honor for God then she should wear it. However having once taken this stand they should be willing to do so even in the face of oppressive situation. Should we give honor to every fashion that has come and gone? I don't think so. During colonial times clothing fashions were used to to control peoples view of the situation. Just as you stated; "Unveiling the Muslim woman of her headscarf was one of the colonizer's great challenges". Why do you think the colonizers wanted to do this? No doubt to control the situation by diluting the culture that they were trying to dominate for financial gain. Today the clothing industry is just as determined for control of people as were colonial masters. But a mature woman of what ever culture should remain true to herself and the standard that she holds as importan showing this stand by how she chooses to dress. Not being influenced by want is popularly said about the meaning and purpose of her style of dress.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
27
Registered:
12/4/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 15, 2007 1:29 PM
in response to:
ussarn
|
|
Well said ussarn. It is as simple as that, every woman should dress as she feels strongly like. In all cases, it is not the way we dress that determines who we are or how we feel about our womanhood. I think a veiled woman and one who doesn't cover both feel equally proud of their femininity. It is a question of whether we think we should market our womanhood or not. Sorry to put it that way.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
64
Registered:
3/22/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 18, 2007 2:50 AM
in response to:
Freedomlover
|
|
but isn't a woman a person before she is a Wo-Man. You keep talking about covering and not covering and marketing or not marketing and forget that we are persons first of all.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jul 8, 2008 6:30 PM
in response to:
ussarn
|
|
I think that the Hijab should be worn to the mosque; however it is the women's personal choice to wear or not to wear it, but if she should chose not to wear the hijab than she should dress modest. "Should we give honor to every fashion that has come and gone?" "But a mature woman of what ever culture should remain true to herself and the standard that she holds as importan showing this stand by how she chooses to dress. Not being influenced by want is popularly said about the meaning and purpose of her style of dress." I have notice that Muslim women are wearing name brand clothing. Don’t Calvin Klein and D & G have their own lines of Hijabs? So no matter what you wear or where you are in this world (which is increasingly getting smaller) the fashion industry has some what of an influence on what a woman wears.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
26
Registered:
3/18/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 19, 2007 11:23 PM
in response to:
Ubuntu
|
|
Allah said: 'And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things) and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts, etc) and not to show off their adornment except what must (ordinarily) appear thereof, that they should draw their veils over their Juyubihinna.'(S24:31).
I don't mean to be confrontational but Allah plainly says that women should draw their vails over their hair, neck and breasts.
We cannot stop wearing hijab just because we live in a non-islamic country just as we cannot deal in interest just because we live in a non-muslim society.
"her salwar kameez would be considered "ostentatious." Rosa We, as humans are not the ones to judge what is ostentatious, moral or immoral. Allah decides and his decree on this is plain. The scholars agree that hijab is NOT OPTIONAL and we should avoid giving fatwas to the contrary as we are not trained in Fiqh and we will be called to account by Allah for guiding people to the wrong.
Salaam Nichole (Mais)
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
2,204
From:
somewhere in cyberspace helping the Pakistanis overcome their inner demons
Registered:
5/30/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 20, 2007 6:49 AM
in response to:
MaisMuslimah
|
|
Is there anything clearly written about legs?So if a muslim woman shaves her head can she go without a hijab? Salaams B B
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 20, 2007 7:56 AM
in response to:
MaisMuslimah
|
|
Hi Nichole, Thank you for your reply. I am not Muslim, so I have difficulty understanding what Muslims write when they sprinkle in Arabic words. Words like Juyubihinna, Fiqh, fatwahs are not to be found in any dictionary I check, so my questions are often made out of assumptions of what I think the intent of the sentence is. You wrote: "We, as humans are not the ones to judge what is ostentatious, moral or immoral." Do you equate immorality and ostentatiousness as being sinful? Is it immoral for a Muslim woman to be seen without her veil no matter what culture she is in? Is it immoral for a non-Muslim woman to go about without wearing a veil? Is it immoral for a Muslim woman to wear clothes that draw attention to herself? Finally, do the above questions have a simple yes or no answer, or are they relative to where the woman is and what situation she may be in? Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
26
Registered:
3/18/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 20, 2007 2:16 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
> Hi Nichole, Thank you for your reply. I am > not Muslim, so I have difficulty understanding what > Muslims write when they sprinkle in Arabic words. > Words like Juyubihinna, Fiqh, fatwahs are not to be > found in any dictionary I check, so my questions are > often made out of assumptions of what I think the > intent of the sentence is. You wrote: > "We, as humans are not the ones to judge what is > ostentatious, moral or immoral." Do you > equate immorality and ostentatiousness as being > sinful? Is it immoral for a Muslim woman to be > seen without her veil no matter what culture she is > in? Is it immoral for a > non-Muslim woman to go about > without wearing a veil? Is it immoral for a > Muslim woman to wear clothes that draw attention to > herself? Finally, do the above questions have a > simple yes or no answer, or are they relative to > where the woman is and what situation she may be > in? Rosa
Hi Rosa. I only have a few mins so I will answer as simply as possible. Please excuse my bluntness. Yes, it is immoral for a woman to not wear a veil in any society, to wear clothes that draw attention to oneself. This is one of the facets of Islam that is simple.
Bob, it is not allowed for a Muslim woman to shave her head just as it is not allowed for a man to grow his hair past a certain length.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
27
Registered:
12/4/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 24, 2007 4:06 PM
in response to:
MaisMuslimah
|
|
I think there's space in Islam for cultural variety within the boarders of morality/Islam. Wear a skirt, jilbab, pants and pakistiani style shirts or whatever you call it and be modest. The colors also vary. It would be very strange to wear black in southeast Asia for example. But all this is within a framework and in the end an individual is supposed to have a right to choose. Everyone's experience even of faith is never the same.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
974
Registered:
2/11/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 25, 2007 2:41 PM
in response to:
Freedomlover
|
|
Is it just me, or didn't I read somewhere in the Quran that Muslims should not imitate the behaviors/customs, of the non-believers? And wouldn't this also apply to dressing in a way that is 'different', in order to 'fit in' to a non-Muslim culture?
So I don't agree with this idea that we should dress in such a way as to 'fit in' with non-believers. We should dress in the way that Islam requires of us, period, regardless of where we are, or what the cultural norm is. The only exception to this, would be in a case where it puts our very lives in danger. (at which time, I have been told, it becomes permissable to 'hide' one's status as a Muslim, even to the point of denying it, verbally, if asked) I think to dress 'ostentatiously', means to dress in such a way as to attempt to infer status to one's self, such as dressing in rich and fancy clothes, to show how prosperous we are...or alternatively, dressing in a certain way, to show we belong to a certain tribe or class of people, which has nothing to do with Islam, but just infers things like cultural and social status.. Dressing modestly and according to what Islam requires, is somewhat different. Though this may well cause others to attribute some kind of status upon us, our purpose (if sincere) is not to infer status upon ourselves, (by doing this for our own ego) but simply to obey Allah.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
27
Registered:
12/4/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 25, 2007 3:33 PM
in response to:
sahara2
|
|
Some cultures are colorful by nature and have different ways of being 'modest' and muslim at the same time. this is not the core problem, however. it is about how women see themselves whichever way they dress. talking about modesty is supposed to liberate women from this level of discussion not trap them in being merely a dress.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 26, 2007 7:11 AM
in response to:
Freedomlover
|
|
Hi Freedomlover, You wrote: "Some cultures are colorful by nature and have different ways of being 'modest' and muslim at the same time." This is exactly the point I was trying to make! This is what modest muslim women look like in some cultures.www.adhunika.org/imagesIndex/adhFundNew.jpg [Edited by: moderator on Mar 26, 2007 8:13 AM]
The mods removed the picture I posted. You have to copy and paste the link given, in order to see it. Message was edited by: Rosa_lia
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
974
Registered:
2/11/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 26, 2007 3:25 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Are you sure these girls are Muslim?? They don't seem to have their heads covered...
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 26, 2007 4:59 PM
in response to:
sahara2
|
|
Hi Sahara, Are you sure these girls are Muslim?? They don't seem to have their heads covered... That's the point I was trying to make! I can show you literally hundreds of pictures of Muslim women in Bangladesh; teachers, students, at wedding celebrations, walking on the street, or just being tourists, and few cover their head. Most will not be wearing a sari like the women in the picture, but they will be wearing a shalwar kameez with an orna. They wear makeup, short sleeves, and many will not only wear lots of jewelry but will also have their nose pierced. In this culture which is predominantly Muslim most women do not cover their heads. That is why I think that the so-called modesty that requires a woman to cover her head and wear long sleeves is an Arab cultural thing...not necessarily a Muslim thing. These Muslim women would be insulted if you told them they were immodest since they do not cover their heads with a veil. Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
26
Registered:
3/18/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 26, 2007 9:45 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Rosa, I am not trying to be argumentative but it is not optional for a Muslim woman to cover her head. Sure, many women don't but according to the Quran this is not something to be debated. It is a requirement. Please see that the scholars of Islam are in agreeance about this. "Wearing Hijab becomes obligatory on every girl once she reaches the age of puberty. This is when she starts to menstruate. So, if you have already reached puberty, then you must wear Hijab. " Zainab Al-Alwani Instructor of Fiqh and Islamic Studies, Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences http://www.islamonline.net/livefatwa/english/Browse.asp?hGuestID=b1Vm39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Must Muslim women wear the hijab? Question : Why must Muslim women wear hijab? Do some Muslims think that it is not mandatory, while others think that it is? Please show me the passages in the Qur’an relating to women covering their hair.
Answer:
I think I should start by answering the last part of your question about the passages in Qur'an that direct the Muslim women to wear hijab as these passages will definitely answer the first part of the question: Why should women wear it?
And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not show off their beauty and ornaments except what is (ordinarily) visible thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband's fathers, their sons, their husbands' sons, their brothers or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their women, or the slaves whom their right hands possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O ye Believers! turn ye all together towards God, that ye may attain Bliss. Holy Quran, Surah 24 Verse 31
O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. Holy Quran Surah 33 Verse 59
The first reason for wearing hijab, then, is that it is a command from God. Religious Muslims - like any other religious people belonging to any revealed religion - don't feel comfortable in deliberately disobeying God! If some Muslims, despite of the semantic clarity of the Qur'anic verses, still think that this ruling is not mandatory, this will not alter the message.
We can have some Muslims who unjustly or ignorantly deny the illegality of drinking alcohol, eating pork or even committing major sins like stealing, fornicating… etc. This does not mean that such things are permitted in Islam! In Islam it is very easy to detect or judge whether a certain ruling is mandatory or not, by going back to the major sources of Islamic legislation. This we technically name as ‘shari'a’. Those sources are the Qur'an, the Holy Book of Muslims, and sunnah, which is the sayings and guiding acts of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), as stated in authentic books. So, simply this is the very same case with hijab.
Notice that this ruling of hijab, is highly esteemed among Muslim women, despite the big pressure of most regimes in the Muslim majority world to forbid it. Sometimes it is forbidden by force or women are discouraged from wearing it. The issue is seen as a means of secularizing or globalizing the Muslim states! This is, in-fact, except for two or three Muslim countries, which encourage their women to observe this ruling or at least "let it go".
The rest are on a savage war against it. Turkey is the outspoken example of such hostility, but the other regimes are not less hostile, albeit silently, towards it. Despite this fact you can find Muslim women insisting on wearing it, even if it costs them their jobs and social status ...
In fact, there is wisdom behind this heavenly command of hijab and behind Muslim women's challenge to wear it. It is that in the Islamic culture - like many other cultures - the idea of women's respectability and virtue is related, among other things, to the propriety of their dress. In Christianity for example, nuns cannot show up without their hijab. Also, regular ladies wear it while attending masses, which is a reflection of self-admission that God wants to see them this way! Also, as far as I know, in Judaism, the most religious faction amongst Jews, namely The Hassidics, have their strict rules about covering women’s bodies. Even in secular societies, some women judges have to cover their heads, during sessions, as a way to show their dignity and self-respect.
Remember that your own puritan American society, before being swept over in the 1950s, by this permissive value system, used to look with embarrassment to any woman going out to the street without her hat! Mini skirts only appeared recently together with the secular and atheist style of life that some people in the west - and the East as well - chose for themselves.
You can also tell that hijab is the way Islam neutralizes a woman's stereotyped role as a mere female, by inciting the society to deal with her as a human being away from her "extra feminine powers"! No wonder then that the majority of Muslim women refuse to let their ‘mill go with all winds’ and that they insist on keeping their Islamic identity. This is regardless of the consistent unfair criticism and sometimes satire against it. They wear hijab, not only in submission to God's order, but also because their inherent moral code is in full harmony with its philosophy.
The term hijab means more than just covering the hair and refers to the general code of modesty outlined in the verses quoted above. To understand what is implied in these verses, consider what it is that women do to show off their beauty. What is it they make a display of to be sexually attractive?
Though to some extent what constitutes showing off of one's beauty depends on the cultural context we live in, there are many parts of the body that are used for showing off beauty across all cultures and these are realities of our human condition not just culture. Hair is recognized by very many of the scholars of Islam, as well as other scholars across the world, as one of them. To be sure that you are not showing off your beauty as a woman you should cover up these areas appropriately.
Thank you
IslamOnline Fatwa Editing Desk http://www.imanway.com/en/showthread.php?t=610 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- There are too many other fatwas to quote.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
3,066
From:
Antwerp
Registered:
8/26/02
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 28, 2007 5:42 AM
in response to:
MaisMuslimah
|
|
I just would like to say that I didn't see anything at all in the bold text wich alledgelly commands women to cover their heads.
As I understand it, it talks about breasts and other private parts. I didn't even see a reference to the head as a whole. Care to point it out for me?
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
974
Registered:
2/11/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 27, 2007 12:16 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
According to my definition of what a 'Muslim' is, these women are not actually Muslim. I suppose they might be offended, if I told them so, but that would still be my general assessment. These are the type, who are Muslim 'in name only', which in my book, means 'not Muslim at all'. If your actions don't make you Muslim, then what does?? We're just supposed to take your word for it, no matter what you do? And please do be aware that the person posting in this thread, under the user name 'Crescent Moon', is really BOB. (and it is exactly because of responses like his, that Muslim women should cover themselves in public. Otherwise, someone is going to get the wrong idea that they are up for grabs) Posting a photo like that, might as well put a 'for sale' sign on your daughters... But then again, that may be exactly what some people want...I believe what is occurring in India, is known as 'innovation'.
Message was edited by: sahara2
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
26
Registered:
3/18/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 27, 2007 1:00 PM
in response to:
sahara2
|
|
I couldn't agree more Sahara. We are commanded to wear hijab to distinguish us as Muslims. Claiming Islam is not enough. I can understand that many people don't wear hijab but that does not make it right.
Saying that hijab isn't mandatory because not all women observe it is comparable to saying that stealing isn't illegal because many people take what's not theirs.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
974
Registered:
2/11/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 27, 2007 1:35 PM
in response to:
MaisMuslimah
|
|
For me, life has to 'make sense'. It doesn't make much sense, to say you are 'Muslim' , but then never read the Quran, or apply anything it says, to your daily life...does it?
Thinking about the picture of those girls, I would have to say they appear to be more like those who are 'clothed, but not clothed'. Even though they are wearing clothing, and it could be said the clothing covers some parts of the their body, yet it is also worn in such a way that it is totally meant to accentuate, adorn, and call attention to their bodies and their beauty. And certainly they are beautiful girls... But what is the effect of posting their picture all over the net, with all their beauty adorned and obvious? Men of all sorts drooling over them, and some of them coming around to bother them, no doubt. Pervs, and married men, and whoever, coming around... (in fact, it seems to me, the whole point of this photo, was to call attention to the physical features of 3 beautiful young girls) Though I don't suppose it would be all that unusual, to find that the 'Muslim' parents of these girls are even willing to 'sell them off' to whatever man comes around offering money. Possibly even some rich American, or some other non-Muslim? But is that really the best thing, for these girls? To make themselves into a 'commodity', and sell themselves off to the highest bidder? They themselves might even see it as an improvement over whatever conditions they are living in now, but how are they going to be treated, by a man who views them only as a 'commodity'? What happens to them, when they get older, and their beauty wears off? Do they get discarded, with about as much ceremony as throwing away a sack of garbage?
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 27, 2007 2:23 PM
in response to:
sahara2
|
|
Hi Sahara, If your actions don't make you Muslim, then what does?? And all this time I thought it was a certain set of beliefs that made one Muslim. I will accept what you say are the qualifying qualities of your own religion. I really have no problem with women wearing cultural clothing. But I DO have a problem with the idea that God wants women to renounce the modest clothing of their own culture in favor of the dress of the ancient Arabic culture. ...be aware that the person posting in this thread, under the user name 'Crescent Moon', is really BOB. LOL! Comparing the past posts of both Crescent Moon and BOB I am sure they will each have a good laugh over your assessment, also. Posting a photo like that, might as well put a 'for sale' sign on your daughters. What a strange comment. Do Muslims often sell their daughters? Do Muslim men look for wives to buy off the internet? Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
974
Registered:
2/11/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 28, 2007 10:00 AM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Do not be deceived Rosa. I acquired proof that BOB and Crescent Moon are the same person, many months ago. You yourself can also see the proof of it, if you follow former threads relating to conversations between me and BOB, (and 'Crescent Moon') about Hugo Chavez. In these posts, the user who calls themselves 'Crescent Moon' posts a false email address, which they claim is the email address of Hugo Chavez. Believing that this 'Crescent Moon' was a sincere person, I sent a privaate email, to what I thought was Hugo Chavez's email address. The answer to that email, however, came from none other than BOB, who made a mistake, however, (either intentionally or accidentally) and included his own name in the details of the reply email.. (though the email itself claimed to be from Hugo Chavez, and was actually quite convincing. I've retained a copy of that email, if you'd like to view it). Once I discovered this deception, BOB then admitted he himself had fabricated the false email address, in order to get me to send him a private email, by which he could then obtain certain personal info about me. (my private email address, and anything he could 'google', using that) Now the important thing to ask yourself is: if BOB is the one who fabricated the false email address, how is it 'Crescent Moon' is the one who posted the false email address?
There are only two possible conclusions to come to, as a result of this situation. Either BOB and Crescent Moon conspired together, to post a false email address for Hugo Chavez, (and also conspired together to share info about anyone who sent emails to that false address) or BOB and Crescent Moon are actually the same person. Draw your own conclusions. I've made complaints to the IOL moderators about this sitaution, but they have not acted on it. (even though their rules state you cannot post in this forum under numerous identities) {Ok, there is one other possibility, BOB may have privately given this email address to Crescent Moon, but I seriously doubt that, as when I posted about my experience with this 'false email address', and the results of sending an email to that address, the person who calls themselves 'Crescent Moon', had no comment) As for the rest - if your beliefs are sincere, then they should translate into actions. For instance, will you say you don't believe in adultery, but then go commit it anyway, and still expect anyone to take you seriously, when you say you don't 'believe' in committing adultery? And I see no point in the photo of the girls, that was posted in this thread, other than to show off their beauty, in hopes of attracting the attention of men. And of course, you notice the automatic response of some men in this thread, upon seeing this photo, is to regard these girls as if they are some kind of mechandise, which has just been put up on a shelf for all the view, who then respond with comments like "I'll take that one". (Who knows, perhap this is even how BOB got his foreign wife? Someone showed him a photo, and he just said 'I'll take that one'?)
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 28, 2007 4:02 PM
in response to:
sahara2
|
|
Hi Sahara, if your beliefs are sincere, then they should translate into actions. You are absolutely correct. Actions DO speak louder than words. But your example of adultery is way off base (sleeping with another person's spouse is not the same as allowing a man to see a wayward strand of hair). Here is a better example which will prove my point. You believe God not only tells people to dress modestly, but He tells people EXACTLY how they are to appear and that is something that cannot be tampered with. No adjustments can be made to compensate for cultural differences. Am I correct so far? Feel free to correct me at any point. Therefore you believe women's hair should be covered, along with their necks, arms, and legs. Her clothing cannot reveal her curves and she is not allowed to stamp her feet (I had to throw that in because I think it is an amusing "law of God" ). You also believe that men should allow their beards to grow untrimmed. Can a woman go to a Mosque to pray if her hair is uncovered? Can a man go to a Mosque to pray if he is clean-shaven or has a neatly trimmed beard? For what purpose do you think men trim their beards?? BECAUSE IT IMPROVES THEIR APPEARANCE--MAKES THEM FIT IN WITH THE REST OF THE CLEAN-SHAVEN SOCIETY!! Like I said, actions speak louder than words! And I see no point in the photo of the girls, that was posted in this thread, other than to show off their beauty, in hopes of attracting the attention of men. There is nothing wrong with seeing pictures of women who are modestly dressed. IOL has pictures of many scarved young women and beardless men. Are those pictures also used for the purpose of attracting the attention of the opposite sex? Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
974
Registered:
2/11/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 11:39 AM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
There is a certain 'pointless' aspect to discussing a topic with someone who has already made up their mind, and so, is only here to 'argue'...
However, due to being somewhat bored, I will attempt to respond anyway..(even though I know nothing I say is likely to make a big difference.) First of all, I would like to ask - Are you Muslim? And exactly why do you have so much hostility towards the idea of a woman dressing modestly and covering her head? (aka - dressing according to Islamic standards) Is this due to a feeling of hostility towards Muslims in general, perhaps? As for the rest of your comments, I will only say this - You either accept God's commandments, or you don't. If you're trying to argue your way out of them somehow, I can't help you with that. I'm sure there are a million different arguments a person can come up with, to justify disobeying God, but that doesn't prove that God is wrong. If you are looking at the way men do things, to justify your arguments, then I can only say - God knows better than man, what is best for us. Clearly, that's not an idea you've accepted yet, and are not ready to understand yet... I have lived my entire life (nearly half a century) in a non-Islamic environment, where people act and dress as they please. I myself have been through many 'phases', when it comes to how I choose to dress, I've worn the shortest mini-skirts and shorts, the tightest jeans, the most revealing tops imaginable...I even went through a 'nudist' phase! (it was the 70's, what can I say?) I've had my hair permed and cut, and molded into a hundred different styles, so I guess you could say I've 'seen it all', when it comes to the many different ways there are to do things. However, after having seen most of what this world has to offer, I have finally settled on God's way, as the better way to do things... I finally realized that all my attempts to alter my appearance, to please men, were really just in vain, and they never actually gained me any real measure of success or happiness. (even though that's what the world promised me these habits would bring) At this point, I personally don't even believe in showing the face, in photos, so I guess you could say I'm more 'hard core' than even many other Muslims out there, in that respect, so yes, I would say, even in the case of Muslim women, who choose to reveal their faces in photos, (or just in public) there often is still an intention to 'seduce'. Perhaps it is only a subconscious choice, on the part of many, perhaps they themselves are not even fully aware of their own intentions, but it's still there. And in the case of men, I would say any man who shaves his face, is not practicing Islam as he should be. He has been compromised. Although, I will also say this - I do think learning to be modest, is 'a work in progress' for many of us. We have to learn to look inside ourselves, and be honest with ourselves about our own weaknesses and intentions, and usually, for most of us, that is a process which takes time. So while I do not agree with uncovering one's hair, or showing one's face in public, etc. (and do keep in mind, the rules are a bit different for women, than for men, due to the fact that the women are 'the weaker sex', and therefore less able to protect themselves from the inappropriate advances of others) I also understand that people are at different levels, in their journey towards God, so it's not like I go around yelling at people, if they choose to do things differently than I do. When it comes to other Muslims, I generally accept them as they are, but I will still choose to do things a bit differently, myself, because that is what I find peace with. That is where I'm at, on my journey. I understand some people are in a different place right now. But I also trust that those who are truly sincere in their desire to purify themselves and get closer to Allah, will eventually find themselves in the same place as myself, because I know that's where the journey eventually leads. Contrary to what you might believe, I'm really not very judgemental with other people, because I know I was once about as bad as any person can get, and God still had patience with me, and gave me time to learn and change, so how could I be any less patient, with other people? You should probably also take into consideration that I have numerous family members who are not Muslim, and who do not dress 'modestly', according to my own standards, but we still manage to get along reasonbly well, although I do hope to encourage them to do things in a better way, as time goes by. I know they're not quite ready for it, right now, but I trust they will end up having experiences similar to what I did, as they try to manage their daily lives, in this ungodly and sinful, dangerous world, which will eventually cause them to realize, (as I finally did), that there has to be a better way! I believe Islam offers the better way. Whether or not you choose to accept it, is your affair.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 1:47 PM
in response to:
sahara2
|
|
Hi Sahara, First of all, I would like to ask - Are you Muslim? Clearly, I am not Muslim. And exactly why do you have so much hostility towards the idea of a woman dressing modestly and covering her head? (aka - dressing according to Islamic standards) I prefer to say that I am being confrontational, because I do not hold any hostility to anyone's modest cultural dress. But I do question the things you say are immodest such as the sight of women's hair and men's clean-shaven faces. You, on the other hand, have shown a great deal of hostility to the way the young women in the picture are dressed, calling their modest clothing "innovative" and by saying they were not REALLY Muslims simply because they dress in a non-Arabic fashion. By the way, if looking at pictures of people is so objectionable, you did not need to copy and paste the link I provided. It clearly said, "This is what modest muslim women look like in some cultures." You didn't answer my questions. Can a woman enter a mosque without wearing a veil? Can a man enter a mosque if he is clean-shaven or has a fashionably trimmed beard? Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
974
Registered:
2/11/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 31, 2007 1:35 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Rosa, Please first learn the requirements of Islam, before confronting others about how they do or do not practice them. You admit you are not Muslim. So what is your purpose for this 'confrontational attitude' in an Islamic discussion forum, unless it is to show hostility for Islam, and what Islam represents? However, there is nothing 'hostile' about stating simple facts. Islam requires a certain dress code. Those who do not follow that dress code are innovating. It's nothing personal, on my part. Just making an objective observation. I also do not consider it 'hostile', just consistent, to state that those who do not practice Islam, cannot really be Muslims, even if they say they are... Consistency is important to me. If someone says to me they are Muslim, then I expect them to behave as if they are. If they don't behave like Muslims, then I have no reason to take their claims seriously. I see nothing at all wrong with that. I'm not sure where you got the idea, but I didn't 'copy and paste' any pictures, I just clicked on a link, in order to view a picture, in order to have a sense of what the topic was about. How was I to know these women would not be properly dressed and covered, since the post claimed they were 'Muslim'? I trusted they would at least have their heads covered! In fact, I see no proof that these women are actually Muslim. For all I know, they could be Hindu. They certainly seem to be dressed for the part... Since I've never been to a mosque myself, I can't answer your last 2 questions. Although I imagine a lot would depend on which mosque you went to... In any case, I don't think what is accepted in any given mosque, determines what Islam actually requires, as people do innovate. If you want to know what Islam requires, you have to actually study Islam, learn what it teaches, and learn what it requires.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
64
Registered:
3/22/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 6:26 AM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Veiling is not a Muslim and Arab thing. Even Christian nuns and portraits of Virgin Mary use a veil, don't they?
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
31
Registered:
7/16/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 30, 2007 4:11 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
i just want to say. that hijab is something that Allah has said we should wear it. but it should never be forced. i think that it is sad to try to force spiritual traits on people, which should ALWAYs be volunatry. evry woman is on her own spiritual journey, and may feel like she should cover more or less. others may disagree, but that is sad if they do. cause there is no compulsion in religion. i wear hijab caus i feel Allah wants me to, but i never judge another sis for not doing it and i know several who do not. they are still my sisters whom i love who are growing in Islam all the time just like me. i thank Allah that i am able to CHOOSE for myself and have never been forced.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
2,204
From:
somewhere in cyberspace helping the Pakistanis overcome their inner demons
Registered:
5/30/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Apr 4, 2007 2:11 PM
in response to:
sahara2
|
|
You may have a point. These women are not following the orthodox interpretation of Islam that states the hijab is mandatory. Perhaps they should be dressed more like this Tehranian Muslimah http://www.iranian.com/Anyway/2007/March/wo.html
B B
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
3,066
From:
Antwerp
Registered:
8/26/02
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 28, 2007 5:34 AM
in response to:
sahara2
|
|
[dressing in a certain way, to show we belong to a certain tribe or class of people]
That makes very little sense knowing that we can pick on the street who is muslim and who not by only looking at the clothes they wear.
[Though this may well cause others to attribute some kind of status upon us, our purpose (if sincere) is not to infer status upon ourselves, (by doing this for our own ego) but simply to obey Allah]
So if I wear 200$ pants, it is by defenition to refer to my "ego" or "social standing"?
Never thought about the possibility that I just like the pants, and don't care about the price, because I can afford it anyway?
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
974
Registered:
2/11/04
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 28, 2007 10:11 AM
in response to:
MeAgain
|
|
The explanation is almost too simple to bother with, but I'll try to clarify it for you anyway... Tribes and social classes are not related to religion, they are secular classes and distinctions. Dressing according to a 'religious code' has to do with morality, not class structure. Your not dressing to please other people, or to get the attention or approval of other people, you're dressing to meet religious requirements. Spending $200 for a pair of pants seems a bit extravagant, to me, so yes, I would consider this a form of 'showing off'. (but then again, got to remember I'm a 'welfare mother' of many years, who would probably consider it quite painful to even spend $20 on a pair of pants!) I think your ego shows through pretty clearly, when you say, you will buy a pair of $200 pants, because 'you can afford it'. It's a way of touting your elevated financial status... (and yes, extravagance is also something Islam frowns upon) Why else would you spend $200 on a pair of pants, when you could easily purchase something much cheaper? Try doing this instead: Buy yourself a perfectly good pair of pants for $50, then donate the other $150 to the poor...
Message was edited by: sahara2
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
3,066
From:
Antwerp
Registered:
8/26/02
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 3:28 AM
in response to:
sahara2
|
|
[Dressing according to a 'religious code' has to do with morality]
That's very very open for debate. Seems to me it's more culture then anything else.
[Spending $200 for a pair of pants seems a bit extravagant, to me, so yes, I would consider this a form of 'showing off']
That's retarded, sorry. It would be showing off if I would emphasise the fact they costed 200 bucks. It would be showing off if I buy them BECAUSE they cost 200 bucks and then brag about it. How is buying something you like showing off?
[but then again, got to remember I'm a 'welfare mother' of many years, who would probably consider it quite painful to even spend $20 on a pair of pants!]
Hence why I said in my previous post "because I can afford it". Those with money don't mind pricetags that much. That is not the same as "spending for the sake of spending" or "because you can".
[I think your ego shows through pretty clearly, when you say, you will buy a pair of $200 pants, because 'you can afford it']
First of all, you are twisting my words. I'm wasn't talking about buying the pants "because I can afford it". I was talking about buying the pants "because I like them", and not minding the pricetag since I can afford it.
That doesn't say anything about my ego at all. Should I be ashamed of being able to afford 200$ pants? If you would be rich, would you buy a used, half-bashed car for 500$, or would you rather buy a new comfortable car with a bit of luxe for 15.000$+ instead?
[It's a way of touting your elevated financial status...]
Eum no. It's just me seeing something I think is cool, grabbing the credit card and buying it. I don't care about money. Why should I? It's only money. Sure, I can imagine I would think differently if I didn't have enough of it. But since I have enough of it, why should I be ashamed of that? Again, I've studied and worked hard to be where I am today. I work more then 60 hours per week, 65+ if I also count in my music. All I have, I earned by myself. Why wouldn't I enjoy the fruits of my labor?
[(and yes, extravagance is also something Islam frowns upon)]
Yeah yeah, save it for rich muslims.
[Why else would you spend $200 on a pair of pants, when you could easily purchase something much cheaper?]
Because I liked the 200$ pants better then the 80$ pants? Because I thought the fabric was of better quality? Because I found the pants to be more comfortable?
[Try doing this instead: Buy yourself a perfectly good pair of pants for $50, then donate the other $150 to the poor...]
1/4th of my monthly paycheck goes to the poor through taxes. Where do you think that welfare check comes from? Furthermore, I choose my donations. I don't just hand it out to "the poor". I donated money with the whole tsunami thingy, Katrina, a funds to build schools in Palestine (to find out later on it was used to kill Israeli's), with the earthquake in Iran and currently, I have an automated payment running to an organisation called "Doctors without vacation". These are doctors who use up all their vacation to go to Africa to treat the sick and educate the other doctors there.
And when I say that I "donated" money, I'm not talking about 50 bucks.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
4
Registered:
3/4/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 4:01 AM
in response to:
Ubuntu
|
|
Assalamualaikum, May the peace of God be on all of us. Just observations on Rosa comments: The question to wear or not to wear a headscarf is not debatable. We are ordained to wear it and we obey by the law. There are islamic rulings and laws that we are obliged to abide by. for ex: what you may perceive as a way to draw attention, even in that context it is a different kind of attention that you are drawing. The muslim girl dresses moderately with a headscarf and a blonde who is half naked. The opposite gender will have a look of curiosity when looking at the girl with the headscarf whereas looking at the blonde will be out of lust. As a female, I would rather to be looked at out of curiosity. You said that you wear what is most suitable for you in a given occasion. Only someone without an identity will act and think this way, like they said you dont believe in anything so you fall for everything. ( With all your respect not mean to sound rude, but that's the reality). I will not dress in a given way just to be part of the crowd. My identity and personality should not dictate my presence. We dont just do things to fit in societies, rather we make society.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 9:52 AM
in response to:
Shaneze
|
|
Hi Shaneze, May the peace of God be on all of us. Thank you for the blessing. May God's peace be upon you also. The question to wear or not to wear a headscarf is not debatable. We are ordained to wear it and we obey by the law. So I ask, what is the difference between the "law" that cannot be broken...such as the one that says a woman must wear a headscarf, and the "law" that is okay to be broken...such as the one that says a man cannot trim or shave his beard? These are comparable laws; they both have to do with hair on the head, they both have to do with facial recognition, they both have to do with ones “attractiveness”, they were both decreed in a time and place when beards and veils were commonplace customs (before safety razors or sewing machines were invented). The muslim girl dresses moderately with a headscarf and a blonde who is half naked. The opposite gender will have a look of curiosity when looking at the girl with the headscarf whereas looking at the blonde will be out of lust. Hold on a minute. Who is saying the ONLY options for women are EITHER wearing Arabic cultural clothing OR going about half naked???? NO ONE BUT YOU!!!! THERE ARE MORE THAN TWO OPTIONS! One option is modest cultural clothing...like the clothing I wear, or the things my daughter wears in Bangladesh. We use our common sense within our given cultures to dress without attracting unwanted attention. Why do you associate being blonde with being half naked? You really do have a cultural problem with people who are non-Arabic in appearance, don't you? And honestly, if a man lusts after my hair color, he has an abnormal fetish. I have heard of men who have a shoe fetish...must all women wear army boots so as to not attract attention of those weirdoes also? You said that you wear what is most suitable for you in a given occasion. Only someone without an identity will act and think this way I confess, I wear clothing suitable for a given occasion...no apologies! Do you think I should wear the coveralls that I wear to the barn splattered with cow manure, into Church or to the grocery store? Or do you think I should always be identified as a cattle farmer by smell? It's called, using COMMON SENSE. With all your respect not mean to sound rude It's not rude, just very sad to consider that you think God gives men common sense to determine whether he needs to wear a suit or a loincloth (from his knees to his ankles) when it is appropriate, but you think women cannot wear occasion-appropriate clothing. Centuries ago, some silly woman appeared before Mohammed wearing a see-through dress and you think his instructions to her to cover herself indicates that no woman can figure out how to dress modestly... but a man can. Sad, sad indeed! Isn't that REALLY what God wants of us...to dress modestly WITHOUT attracting unwanted attention? Isn't that what men have done when they adapt the appearance of facial hair to the culture they are in? I will not dress in a given way just to be part of the crowd. Yet you insist that a woman of a non-Arabic culture must adopt the clothing style of ancient Arabic times in order to be a good Muslim. You force her to do what you say you won't do...such hypocrisy! Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
2
Registered:
3/31/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 31, 2007 12:14 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Greetings Rosa,
I think you have gotten it all wrong about the need to cover to wear the hijab as being an Arabian cultural clothing. The covering of the "aurat" or hair, chest, arms and legs does not require a Muslim woman to be dressed like a Arabian woman, but she can choose to do so if she wishes. If you look beyond Arab nations and Bangladesh, you will realise that there are many Muslimah who are decently clothed within the teachings of Islam; donning a large scarf, shawl or long cloth to cover their hair while dressed in traditional costumes that reveals only the face and palms of their hands.
In Malaysia for example, working Muslim women of Malay, Indian and Chinese ethicity can move about in long sleeved blouses/jackets and long loose skirts/pants; we wear scarfs or shawls that matches the clothes we wear. There is never any compulsion to wear like the Arab women as long as we only reveal the parts that can be revealed- our faces and palms of the hands.
You may have confused yourself with the Muslims who do not practice 100% of Islamic teachings in some cultures... like there are some Christians who do not practice Christianity, there are some Muslims who have yet to learn to follow the real Islamic teachings. Also wearing modest clothing still do not fulfill the requirements of covering oneself according to Islamic teachings. You may claim that it is fine enough to be decently dressed according to your standards for certain occasions... but who dictates what you should wear? Yourself who sew your own clothes? Your fashion designer who may have some idea about how a woman should be dressed? Your western society that decides it is fashionable to wear sleeveless dresses for one season and mini skirts for the next? What you calim as common sense is stimulated by the minds of mere mortals that are fickle and have their own agendas.
Unlike western styles, Islamic dressing is a decree by God to protect the modesty of Muslim women. Islamic dressing is not about being clothed like Arab people but rather, it's about being properly covered for both men and women. And yes, there is also rules for men too; that is being covered from the navel to the knees.
Before women are decently dressed by covering up what should be covered, they have been the target of unwanted attention by men... therefore wearing the hijab hs actually raised our worth as women. Our womenhood and our sexuality is reserved for our husbands and not for the stares of men on the streets. And despite what you claim as being being dressed modestly without attracting unwanted attention, walking in the streets in a decent looking short-sleeved blouse and skirt still invites stares from men. Your cleavage, the curves of your brassiere and your uncovered hair will have a least a man giving you a second glance, giving you the attention which you might not welcome... unlike us Muslim women who are free to walk down the streets and not feeling virtually stripped by men. People may be hostile but they will never look at the covered women sexually like they look at an modernly dressed woman. Don't believe me? Try wearing a hijab for a day and you'll understand what I mean.
You may think that we are being forced to be dressed in such a way. Well, as as Muslim revert, I can say for the rest of my Muslim sisters that we are proud to be dressed in such a way. We obey our Maker and by doing that, pleases Him.. and despite protests in the world, we believe that we will be duly rewarded hereafter. And that is why more and more women are wearing the headscarf, more and more women are covering up according to Islamic teachings, because it is the undeniable Truth.
Message was edited by: nyonya
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Apr 2, 2007 9:59 AM
in response to:
nyonya
|
|
Hi Nyonya, Thank you for your honest reply. Your response and that of others has convinced me that your veil is something that Mohammed has told you women must wear, regardless of what culture you are in. I am gradually learning WHAT your beliefs are but many times I have a great deal of trouble understanding WHY. I agree with Sahara when she said that things must make sense to her, and this is one thing that simply does not make sense to me. I don't mean to offend you but, coming from an outsider looking in, the idea that MEN can go about nearly naked in a loincloth while WOMEN can only expose their faces and the palms of their hands does not seem like something Almighty God would say. Instead, it seems to be a law made by a man who enjoys his own freedom but is unable to control his libido. It's true that men enjoy looking at scantily clad women. And although women do not normally make cat-calls or whistles at handsome men, nevertheless, they enjoy looking at a well-groomed muscular body of the opposite sex. Mohammed knew this about men, but because he was not a woman, he was unaware that it is also true of women. This is why I feel Mohammed (not God) restricted the appearance of WOMEN because HE was the one experiencing the arousal. Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
26
Registered:
3/18/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Apr 2, 2007 11:51 AM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
The reason why Allah gave us more specific guidelines with Islam than with the previous Abrahamic faiths is because this debate about moral and immoral happens time and time again. Therefore, in order to avoid this, Allah told us EXACTLY what is required in food/dress/family life/general behavior and so on. With dress, hijab is explicitly ordered if you understand the Arabic translation.
This is not something optional or cultural. We are not allowed to argue with what Allah has ordered. I don't want to cause offense but this has become pointless to argue with non-Muslims. Insha'Allah they will become Muslim one day but if they are not ready to submit and worship the One God than they will most likely not submit to accepting Islamic clothing.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
2
Registered:
5/5/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
May 5, 2007 1:02 AM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Rosa_lia, I have some information that might be of interest to you in gaining a greater understanding the complexities of Islam. I am an Anthropologist from the United States I mostly study Amish and mennonite religions but recently I have started studying Islam. These are some books that helped me a lot. Keep in mind that the different sources Quran, Hadith, not to mention the highly interpretive nature of the hadith by Islamic scholars from different schools of thought (fatwahs). Phew! Any how here are some great books although you could never read enough! Judith Tucker "In the house of the law" Law of Desire Women the Quran and interpretations Mussalam "To honor the bride" -this is fiction but a beautiful story. It explains the logical approach in solving family oriented legal issues. With the hopeful outcome of everyone benefiting the the fullest extent. Ok so i am having some difficulty in remembering the autors names. A very important place to start researching is Islamic law. Two other important things that helped me "cultural relativism" and remembering that Islamic cultures are likely to think in terms of working for the greater good and seem to resolve issues in a highly logical manner. As opposed to Americans who work for individual gain and tend to be more often driven by emotions and competitive natures. This last comment is just an observation I have made drawing off the very limited resources I have consulted. This is by no means something I am claiming as truth for everyone in these groups. But coming here and talking with muslim women was certainly a great way to gather information. Also there are many rough translations for Islamic terms and phrases online. Im not sure of the website but will be sure to post the address once I find it. The problem seems a lot of times that these terms being used are more of a concept or perhaps a word that is just not included in the english language. Its easy to pick up on after a little practice!
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
27
From:
UK
Registered:
10/19/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 7, 2008 10:41 AM
in response to:
nyonya
|
|
Thanks for such a lucid reply, Nyonya. I have visited Egypt several times in the last year and have tried to ensure that I don't inadvertently cause offence or attract unwanted attention by not dressing suffienctly modestly by the standards of the communities I was in. This is not so much of an issue in places such as Dahab where the locals are 'used' to seeing western non-muslim women but I did feel like I stuck out like a sore thumb in Alexandria despite wearing a salwar kameeze with 3/4 length sleeves. I find such clothing as the salwar invaluable in hot places for keeping cool and in avoiding getting my rather pale skin fried to a crisp! That is, I'm not trying to mimic another culture or be something I'm not. My question is this: If I am visiting a Muslim country as a non-Muslim western woman and don't want to appear 'loose' or immoral, how am I expected to dress? Of course, I am ignoring countries where a particular style of modest dress is dicatated by law rather than being driven from personal desire to adhere to God's will in this question as in such places one simply has to comply with what is mandated. Fee
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
2
Registered:
3/31/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Mar 31, 2007 12:20 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
greetings Rosa,
I think you have gotten it all wrong about the need to cover to wear the hijab as being an Arabian cultural clothing. The covering of the "aurat" or hair, chest, arms and legs does not require a Muslim woman to be dressed like a Arabian woman, but she can choose to do so if she wishes. If you look beyond Arab nations and Bangladesh, you will realise that there are many Muslimah who are decently clothed within the teachings of Islam; donning a large scarf, shawl or long cloth to cover their hair while dressed in traditional costumes that reveals only the face and palms of their hands. In Malaysia for example, working Muslim women of Malay, Indian and Chinese ethicity can move about in long sleeved blouses/jackets and long loose skirts/pants; we wear scarfs or shawls that matches the clothes we wear. There is never any compulsion to wear like the Arab women as long as we only reveal the parts that can be revealed- our faces and palms of the hands.
You may have confused yourself with the Muslims who do not practice 100% of Islamic teachings in some cultures... like there are some Christians who do not practice Christianity, there are some Muslims who have yet to learn to follow the real Islamic teachings. Also wearing modest clothing still do not fulfill the requirements of covering oneself according to Islamic teachings. You may claim that it is fine enough to be decently dressed according to your standards for certain occasions... but who dictates what you should wear? Yourself who sew your own clothes? Your fashion designer who may have some idea about how a woman should be dressed? Your western society that decides it is fashionable to wear sleeveless dresses for one season and mini skirts for the next? What you calim as common sense is stimulated by the minds of mere mortals that are fickle and have their own agendas.
Unlike western styles, Islamic dressing is a decree by God to protect the modesty of Muslim women. Islamic dressing is not about being clothed like Arab people but rather, it's about being properly covered for both men and women. And yes, there is also rules for men too; that is being covered from the navel to the knees.
Before women are decently dressed by covering up what should be covered, they have been the target of unwanted attention by men... therefore wearing the hijab hs actually raised our worth as women. Our womenhood and our sexuality is reserved for our husbands and not for the stares of men on the streets. And despite what you claim as being being dressed modestly without attracting unwanted attention, walking in the streets in a decent looking short-sleeved blouse and skirt still invites stares from men. Your cleavage, the curves of your brassiere and your uncovered hair will have a least a man giving you a second glance, giving you the attention which you might not welcome... unlike us Muslim women who are free to walk down the streets and not feeling virtually stripped by men. People may be hostile but they will never look at the covered women sexually like they look at an modernly dressed woman. Don't believe me? Try wearing a hijab for a day and you'll understand what I mean.
You may think that we are being forced to be dressed in such a way. Well, as as Muslim revert, I can say for the rest of my Muslim sisters that we are proud to be dressed in such a way. We obey our Maker and by doing that, pleases Him.. and despite protests in the world, we believe that we will be duly rewarded hereafter. And that is why more and more women are wearing the headscarf, more and more women are covering up according to Islamic teachings, because it is the undeniable Truth.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
64
Registered:
3/22/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Apr 2, 2007 9:20 AM
in response to:
nyonya
|
|
I want to ask a question: why is the discussion of womanhood reduced to morality/immorality/veil debate? Whether we support it or not, it is just one side, and there's a lot more about a woman to talk about. Her emotions, her achievements, her identity, motherhood. But it is US women who have come to associate ourselves with only this.
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
2,204
From:
somewhere in cyberspace helping the Pakistanis overcome their inner demons
Registered:
5/30/06
|
|
|
|
Here is a Hijab-less muslim
Posted:
Apr 2, 2007 11:44 AM
in response to:
chicamuslima
|
|
Charismatic Iraqi singer Shatha Hassoun shot to stardom in her war-torn homeland on Saturday as a symbol of unity after winning the Arab version of "American Idol" Even in the deeply religious Shiite holy city of Najaf where every Iraqi woman on the street is draped head-to-toe in black abayas, a world away from the elegant cut of Shatha's strappy blue evening dress, people were delighted.
"We welcome this woman because she has held the name of Iraq aloft. We needed a voice to unify us," said Islamist politician Sabah Ahmed.
"Being an Islamist, I have some reservations about singing. But seven million votes for this woman from walks of society! With this percentage she outclassed politicians in Iraq. Therefore the victory unites Iraqis," he added. http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=20209 B B
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
17
Registered:
3/29/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Here is a Hijab-less muslim
Posted:
Apr 5, 2007 6:38 AM
in response to:
BOB
|
|
That doesn't mean that hijabis can't have similar success here's a girl who wanted to live her life normally with hijab but who'd let her http://www.theglobalgame.com/blog/?p=241
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
31
Registered:
7/16/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Apr 19, 2007 12:11 AM
in response to:
Shaneze
|
|
WOW mashalla!
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
7
Registered:
12/3/05
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 23, 2007 11:54 AM
in response to:
TheREALBoris
|
|
Rosa if you do not know why the differences among muslim women in regards to hijab, then you should ask the muslims who know why. For your information, hijab is compulsory for muslim women whereever they come from. If they are not wearing it in Bangladesh that is a matter between them and their lord. I am a Nigerian, and in Nigeria muslim women wear hijab and jilbab and bhukah. The arabs did not wear hijab before the advent of Islam. So, please stop this ignorance and know that it is ordained by Allah. If you don`t know anything about Islam, you should ask instaed of peddling ignorance. Have you asked yourself why Catholic nuns wear headscarf wherever they come from? Thank you
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 23, 2007 9:10 PM
in response to:
drlateef
|
|
Hi Drlateef, Rosa if you do not know why the differences among muslim women in regards to hijab, then you should ask the muslims who know why. That is precisely what I did! But they didn't tell me the REAL REASON WHY...I had to find it on my own. For your information, hijab is compulsory for muslim women whereever they come from. If they are not wearing it in Bangladesh that is a matter between them and their lord. I am a Nigerian, and in Nigeria muslim women wear hijab and jilbab and bhukah. And that is what I was told. The arabs did not wear hijab before the advent of Islam. I know that, too. Sahih Bukhari V6 B60 #282 wrote: 'Aisha used to say: "When (the Verse): "They should draw their veils over their necks and bosoms," was revealed, (the ladies) cut their waist sheets at the edges and covered their faces with the cut pieces." So, please stop this ignorance and know that it is ordained by Allah. If you don`t know anything about Islam, you should ask instaed of peddling ignorance. I have learned a lot since this thread began. One thing I learned is the reason WHY women started wearing veils. It may surprise you but after I read the reason for wearing it, I completely agreed with it. But the funny thing is, through the entire length of this thread, no Muslim ever took the time to tell me WHY...I had to discover it on my own! In case you or some other reader here doesn't know (but being Muslim, I am SURE you know WHY you wear a veil), it is because Mohammed's wives were being recognized by the voyeur Umar when they went out into the open field to "relieve themselves." That's right, a guy was watching the open field at night to see if he could recognize Mohammed's wives when they went pee! He told Mohammed who, instead of saying "Off with your head for spying on my women" Mohammed told the women to start wearing veils. Honest to goodness, that is why you wear a veil today! Like I said, I agree that Mohammed's wives needed privacy when toileting, and covering themselves in a veil was definitely the cheapest way to accomplish that. (I also think Mohammed should have done a better job of protecting his wives from "Peeping Toms" too.) But if Mohammed lived today, don't you think God would have allowed him many of the "luxuries" of modern life. He would drive a car instead of ride a camel. He would probably have air conditioning. He would use toilet paper or WetOnes instead of stones, and he would tell his wives to just close the bathroom door to keep Umar from watching them pee. Have you asked yourself why Catholic nuns wear headscarf wherever they come from? Well, it isn't to keep people from recognizing them when they use the toilet! Thank you You're welcome! Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
4
Registered:
2/16/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 24, 2007 4:14 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
Reading through this thread, I really feel we are all wasting our time on Rosa_Lia. Her comments are ignorant, sarcastic, insulting, and show a total commitment to maintaining her ignorance. I wonder what her motivation is in this post at all. As she says, she is not a Muslim, is not subject to any Islamic laws, and is happy with her own life: SO LEAVE OTHER PEOPLE TO BE HAPPY WITH THEIRS! As for your absurd characterization of hijab as "Arabic," does it really make any sense to you at all that in a region with 40-50 degree centigrade temperatures, that the logical thing to do would be to cover up? Hijab is completely Islamic and not cultural! Your equally ridiculous talk of Muslim men being able to wear loincloths is not only false, but have you ever visited a Muslim country? I spent time in the middle east, and even in Egypt, in August, men rarely even wore short sleeves. Shorts were almost completely absent, except on the beach where a few men wore shorts and t-shirts while swimming--I didn't see a single male shirtless. As for the craziness you attribute to Umar (RA)--this is not even worth a reply. I of course have no control, but I would suggest to the rest of the Muslims on this thread to stop responding to Rosa-Lia, unless she develops some respect for our religion in her threads. The Qu'ran tells us to leave gatherings where people are making fun of Islam, and Rosa's ludicrous writings certainly seem to fit that description.
Assalamu Alaikum wa rahmatAllahi wa Barakatu (sorry to those who have trouble with Arabic sprinklings!)
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
585
Registered:
11/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 24, 2007 8:33 PM
in response to:
btec06
|
|
Hi Btec, You are right, sometimes I DO get a little sarcastic. I try not to, but sometimes when I disagree with something, it just comes out that way. Hijab is completely Islamic and not cultural! If you read the entire thread as you say you did, then you would have read where I conceded nearly three months ago that you are correct; the veil is a Muslim thing which started when Mohammed made his pronouoncement. I came to realize it when I read the ahadith where Aisha said the wives made veils for themselves AFTER Mohammed's pronouncement. This showed me that the veil was not something that women of the region wore before the there was a need. As for the craziness you attribute to Umar (RA)--this is not even worth a reply. Crazy but true! I am sorry if it embarrasses you, but here it is in the ahadith: Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 148: Narrated 'Aisha: The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. 'Umar used to say to the Prophet "Let your wives be veiled," but Allah's Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam'a the wife of the Prophet went out at 'Isha' time and she was a tall lady. 'Umar addressed her and said, "I have recognized you, O Sauda." He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of "Al-Hijab" (A complete body cover excluding the eyes). Sahih Muslim Book 026, Number 5397: 'A'isha reported that the wives of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) used to go out in the cover of night when they went to open fields (in the outskirts of Medina) for easing themselves. 'Umar b Khattab used to say: Allah's Messenger, ask your ladies to observe veil, but Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) did not do that. So there went out Sauda, daughter of Zama, the wife of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), during one of the nights when it was dark. She was a tall statured lady. 'Umar called her saying: Sauda, we recognise you. (He did this with the hope that the verses pertaining to veil would be revealed.) 'A'isha said: Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, then revealed the verses pertaining to veil Your equally ridiculous talk of Muslim men being able to wear loincloths is not only false What would you call a garment that simply covers the area from the navel to the knees? According to Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid in Islam Question and Answer, a site which is supposed to be a very good one for reading about Islam, that is precisely what Mohammed was describing...a loincloth. You’re right about one thing though, according to this scholar men aren’t allowed to wear shorts. http://www.islamqa.com/index.php?ref=150&ln=eng&txt=men's%20'awrah "The `awrah (private parts to be necessarily covered) for men includes what is between the navel and the knees as stated by the Prophet SAWS (peace be upon him), so covering it is obligatory according to Islamic law." I welcome any corrections on mistakes I may have made here! Rosa
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
2,204
From:
somewhere in cyberspace helping the Pakistanis overcome their inner demons
Registered:
5/30/06
|
|
|
|
OK, I'll bite
Posted:
Jun 25, 2007 11:38 AM
in response to:
btec06
|
|
"Hijab is completely Islamic and not cultural! " No it's not. The veil is not a uniquely Islamic convention; the practice has a long history in the Judeo-Christian tradition. Catholic nuns engage in the practice, of course, and there are several references to the practice in both the Old and New Testaments (King James Version). Ironically, the representation of veiling in the Bible is much more problematic than those in the Qur'an or the Hadith, because the Judeo-Christian sources imply that women should be covered because of their inherent inferiority. I Corinthians 11 (3-10) offers one example: But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. Every man praying or prophesying having his head covered, dishonoreth his head. But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoreth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn or shaven; but if it be a hame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels. http://www.english.emory.edu/Bahri/Veil.html John Esposito, professor of Islamic Studies at Georgetown University, writes that the customs of veiling and seclusion of women in early Islam were assimilated from the conquered Persian and Byzantine societies and then later on they were viewed as appropriate expressions of Quranic norms and values. Bloom and Blair also write that the Qur'an doesn't require women to wear veils; rather, it was a social habit picked up with the expansion of Islam. In fact, since it was impractical for working women to wear veils, "A veiled woman silently announced that her husband was rich enough to keep her idle."[15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab Salaams B B
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
26
Registered:
3/18/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 25, 2007 4:40 PM
in response to:
Rosa_lia
|
|
I will not argue these points anymore however I feel it is my duty as a Muslim to inform you Rosa that it is very offensive to Muslims when you speak lightly or wrong of a Companion of the Prophet (SAW) such as Umar. I doubt that you meant it to sound this way but I just wanted to address it so that hopefully we can prevent it from happening again. He did not hide to spy on the wives of the Prophet (SAW). This wife that is referred to was known to be very tall and while she walked through the area to walk out to the wilderness to answer the call of nature, Umar (May Allah be please with him) recognized her and called out to her so that she would feel embarrassed and perhaps Hijab would become mandatory. The way that you phrased the story makes Umar (May Allah be please with him) sound negative and maybe you didn’t mean to make it sound that way. I don’t want to sound harsh but it is very terrible to Muslims to hear anything that might paint the Companions (May Allah be pleased with them all) in a negative way. Nichole
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
350
Registered:
6/20/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 25, 2007 11:11 AM
in response to:
Ubuntu
|
|
Salams, In Islam, no where, in the Quran, or in any authentic hadith has either Allah or the Prophet specified or instructed Muslim women to cover their head or hair. Most opinions about wearing headscarves are formulated by (male) scholars. (Remember, various scholars will have alternative views). Modesty is the key. Men and Women should be decently dressed, they should not seek to attract attention, they should cover their genitals and women must also cover their chests. Both males and females should subdue their sexual glances and observe modesty and chastity. For more information read these articles: Origins of Hijab Context of Hijab Headscarf & Veiling A Critic upon Jilbab Splitting Hair to Cover Hair Must a Woman Wear a Jilbab? Hijab Has Nothing to do With Morality The Qur'an Does Not Mandate Hijab Misinterpretation of Quranic Verses on Hijab Thoughts on Hijab By Sr. Ruqaiyyah Waris Maqsood O you Children of Adam! We have bestowed on you raiment to cover your shame as well as to be an adornment to you. But the raiment of righteousness, that is the best. Such are among the Signs of Allah, that they may receive admonition.” (Quran 7:26) Finally, it is a woman's choice what she wears and there is no compulsion in religion. The Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) has said that Islam is a religion of the middle path (Wast). The Qur'an has called the Muslim nation 'Ummat al-Wusta'. وَكَذَلِكَ جَعَلْنَاكُمْ أُمَّةً وَسَطًا لِتَكُونُوا شُهَدَاءَ عَلَى النَّاسِ وَيَكُونَ الرَّسُولُ عَلَيْكُمْ شَهِيدًا … (البقرة 143) Thus have We made of you a middle Ummah, that you might be witnesses over the people, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves… ( al-Baqarah 2:143) Laa ikraaha fi-d-deen. Qad tabayyana ar-rushdu min al-ghayy There is no compulsion in religion. Wisdom has been made distinct from the untruth. (2;256)
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
26
Registered:
3/18/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 25, 2007 5:24 PM
in response to:
Fitra
|
|
I was resarching the President of that site that your quotes regarding hijab came from and I don't see any of his qualifications regarding Islam. He has a lot of education in many fields Masha'Allah but his site lists no Islamic degrees. Do you have any other proof that Hijab is not mandatory besides from that "Institute" and blogs of personal opinions? If you were to assume that "gather" is what was meant by hijab in the Ayats it would make no sense. I don't understand your argument. And to say that scholars made the command of the hijab up is not possible. The memorization of haddith and Quran would make it impossible that scholars later added the command of hijab. The Prophet tells us in may Hadith that it is required to wear hijab and that the women who do not observe proper hijab will not even smell the scent of Paradise. Have you read any of the Riyad As-Saliheen which are all Sahih hadith from the Prophet? Aisha reported that the wives of Allah's Messenger Prophet Muhammed used to go out in the cover of night when they went to open fields (in the outskirts of Medina) for relieving themselves. Umar bin Khattab used to say: Allah's Messenger, ask your ladies to observe veil, * Narrated Anas ibn Malik: I know (about) the Hijab (the order of veiling of women) more than anybody else. Ubay ibn Ka'b used to ask me about it. Allah's Apostle became the bridegroom of Zaynab bint Jahsh whom he married at Medina. After the sun had risen high in the sky, the Prophet invited the people to a meal. Allah's Apostle remained sitting and some people remained sitting with him after the other guests had left. Then Allah's Apostle got up and went away, and I too, followed him till he reached the door of 'Aisha's room. Then he thought that the people must have left the place by then, so he returned and I also returned with him. Behold, the people were still sitting at their places. So he went back again for the second time, and I went along with him too. When we reached the door of 'Aisha's room, he returned and I also returned with him to see that the people had left. Thereupon the Prophet hung a curtain between me and him and the Verse regarding the order for (veiling of women) Hijab was revealed. Sahih Bukhari 7:65:375, Sahih Muslim 8:3334 Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: Allah does not accept the prayer of a woman who has reached puberty unless she wears a veil.[3] Sunnan Abu Dawud 2:641 Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin: Asma bint Abu Bakr, entered upon the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) wearing thin clothes. The Apostle of Allah turned his attention from her. He said: O Asma', when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it does not suit her that she displays her parts of body except this and this, and he pointed to her face and hands.[4] Sunnan Abu Dawud 32:4092 Narrated Umm Salama Hind bint Abi Umayya, Ummul Mu'minin: When the verse "That they should cast their outer garments over their persons" was revealed, the women of Ansar came out as if they had crows over their heads by wearing outer garments.[5] Sunnan Abu Dawud 32:4090 Narrated Safiya bint Shaiba: 'Aisha used to say: "When (the Verse): "They should draw their veils over their necks and bosoms," was revealed, (the ladies) cut their waist sheets at the edges and covered their faces with the cut pieces."[6] Sahih Bukhari 6:60:282, Sunnan Abu Dawud 32:4091 http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=10&ID=5849&CATE=223 Concerning the standard explanation of the verse of hijab Answered by Ustadha Zaynab Ansari
Nichole Assalamu alaikum, I wanted to get clarification on the explanation Sh. Nuh gave on the evidence for hijab. This has been a topic of debate since the hijab ban discussion in France and I'm unclear now on where the requirement comes from.
Sh. Nuh writes:
'There is no other lexical sense in which the word khimar may be construed. The wording of the command, however, and let them drape their headcoverings over their bosoms, sometimes confuses nonspecialists in the sciences of the Qur'an, and in truth, interpreting the Qur'an does sometimes require in-depth knowledge of the historical circumstances in which the various verses were revealed. In this instance, the elliptical form of the divine command is because women at the time of the revelation wore their headcovers tied back behind their necks, as some village women still do in Muslim countries, leaving the front of the neck bare, as well as the opening (Ar. singular jayb, plural juyub, translated as "bosoms" in the above verse) at the top of the dress. The Islamic revelation confirmed the practice of covering the head, understood from the use of the word khimar in the verse, but also explained that the custom of the time was not sufficient and that women were henceforth to tie the headcover in front and let it drape down to conceal the throat and the dress's opening at the top.'
I'm a bit confused about how the wording used in these particular verses are considered to be a command. My earlier understanding of the evidence for hijab was that the specificity of the command came from the hadith in Abu Dawood about the Prophet (AS) pointing out to Asma that only the face and hands should be revealed. Can you please clarify what it is about the wording/grammar in the verses reference above that makes them the evidence for the fard status for hijab? I'm not clear how the word "khimar" in and of itself is used as evidence to say that hijab is required.  In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful. Praise be to Allah. May Allah's peace and blessings shower upon our beloved Messenger. Dear Sister, The obligation of hijab is evident when we examine the grammatical structure of this verse. The verse reads: وَقُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنَ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلاَ يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلاَّ مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَى جُيُوبِهِنَّ The translation: "And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms..." [Abdullah Yusuf Ali] The style of the language employed in the verse is very important. Allah Most High begins with the imperative form of the verb "qalla," which means to say or tell. Thus, Allah Most High is commanding the Prophet, peace be upon him, to tell the believing women to take a series of steps: 1. To guard their gaze, which is an important factor in modest interaction; 2. To guard their chastity or sexuality; 3. To conceal their adornment and natural beauty, which scholars have interpreted to mean the whole body except for the face, hands, and (for Hanafis) the feet. 4. And, finally, to emphasize the above point, Allah Ta'ala uses the phrase, "wa-lyadhribna bikhumurihinna ala juyubihinna." The verb "yadhribna" which means "to draw or pull over" appears as a feminine plural, thus going back to the original subject of the verse, the believing women. Most importantly, it starts off with the letter "lam," which is called "lam al-amr." Lam al-amr, when prefixed to a present tense verb, such as "yadhribna," makes the verb an imperative, that is, a command. It is not understood as a recommendation, but a specific command directly from Allah Most High to His slaves among the believing women. Lam al-amr is used in other imperative contexts in the Qur'an. For example, Allah Ta'ala says, "Let the man of means spend according to his means: and the man whose resources are restricted, let him spend according to what God has given him..." [Al-Talaq, 65:7] The Arabic reads: لِيُنفِقْ ذُو سَعَةٍ مِّن سَعَتِهِ وَمَن قُدِرَ عَلَيْهِ رِزْقُهُ فَلْيُنفِقْ مِمَّآ ءَاتَاهُ اللَّهُ لاَ يُكَلِّفُ اللَّهُ نَفْساً إِلاَّ مَآ ءَاتَاهَا Here, Allah Most High is commanding men to spend according to their means in the context of child support for divorced wives. This is understood to be a command, not a recommendation, since men are required to support their children. The lam of command, or lam al-amr, once again appears prefixed to the present verb, "yunfiq," meaning "to spend." [Qatr al-Nada, Dar al-Asmaa, 96] To return to the verse in question, the phrase "wa-lyadhribna bikhumurihinna ala juyubihinna," is a command for women to draw their veils over their bosoms. Allah Most High did not say, "And tell the believing women to put on their veils," because implicit in the verse is the understanding that women were already expected to veil. However, unlike the practice at the time of leaving the scarf hanging down the back with the neck and cleavage exposed, Muslim women were to take it one step further and draw the "khimar" or veil over the neck and cleavage area. Those who argue that the Qur'an says nothing about veiling are completely misreading this verse. Not only does the Qur'anic text make it clear that women are expected to veil, it also dictates the extent of the veiling, i.e., covering the neck and cleavage. This point is elucidated by reports from Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her, and other women of the Sahaba, who immediately implemented this verse by tearing up pieces of cloth and covering their hair and bodies. Al-Bukhari recorded that Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her, said: "May Allah have mercy on the women of the early emigrants. When Allah revealed the verse: [وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَى جُيُوبِهِنَّ] (and to draw their veils over their bosoms), they tore their aprons and veiled themselves [made khimars] with them.'' [Tafsir Ibn Kathir] The actions of the Sahaba, may Allah be pleased with them all, did not indicate that hijab was optional. I find it interesting that hijab was not legislated in stages, as opposed to the ban on intoxicants. When the verses in Surat al-Nur were revealed, the female Sahaba immediately covered themselves. Would that we had a fraction of their iman! And Allah knows best. Umm Salah (Zaynab Ansari)
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
350
Registered:
6/20/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 26, 2007 4:43 AM
in response to:
MaisMuslimah
|
|
Salams, You have probably read just one opinion and based it on that. The problem with this logic you have described is that unless someone has an "Islamic Degree" anyone else's opinion is not credible. There weren't Islamic degrees during the time after the sahibas and hadiths were written about nearly 65 years after the prophet pbuh passed away. I do not discount the hadiths you quoted, as they are the same hadiths that are quoted and discussed in the links I also have provided, however the Prophet (pbuh) never commanded women to cover the hair, nor is it mentioned in the hadiths that you've quoted, plus, one hadith you mentioned is weak and has a missing chain and is still silent about covering the hair. I have read your article on Sheikh Nuh's response, another "internet blog" as you described my links, months prior to my response here yesterday and I totally disagree with this opinion as there is NO EVIDENCE either from the Quran or Sunnah that the khimar must cover all the hair. The Prophet never ordered it and neither has Allah (swt) ordered us to wear a khimar (covering) on our heads. Some Arabic women were not even wearing the khimar at all, if they did it was ornamentally hung around their heads or necks & main use was for desert purposes such as the heat of the sun and sand storms. It would be interesting if you studied where the history of veiling faces and heads actually originated from. However you are free to follow your opinion as I am free to follow mine but I disagree strongly with you if you are saying all women must cover their hair, as only the bosoms (jayb) is mentioned in the verse in the Quran about the khimar, the "shar" and "ras" or the head is not even mentioned and my point above is very clear. I have given you numerous links from various scholars, but if you want to disregard and discredit them as only internet blogs that is up to you. Sheikh Nuh that you quoted and Yusuf Qaradawi are only two Islamic Scholars there are many, many more diverse scholars. Amjad Moiz from Understanding Islam.com is not just a lay person or an internet blog, he is an Islamic Scholar from the Al Mawrid Institute in Pakistan and Shehzad Saleem from the same Institute is another Islamic Scholar. Dr Zaki Badawi, also another Islamic Scholar has the same opinion about the headscarf not being obligatory is yet another. Tariq Ramadan with the same opinions that the headscarf is not fard, is another and I have given you a link from Ruqayyah Maqsud who also says a women covering her chest with the khimar has fulfilled her Islamic duty according to the Quran and no where in Islam can women be reprimanded for not covering her hair or how they choose to dress. No one is forcing you to take your headscarf or veil off so in the same courtesy no one should be forced or compelled to wear one or be called a "hypocrite" if they don't, as some women deride others. Women have the right to choose which Islamic opinion they wish to follow. I suggest you read all the opinions of various scholars below before making assumptions about me or my intelligence or before you start a lengthy debate and attack me with fabricated or weak hadiths and mistranslations of hadiths. I can also copy and paste large passages form scholars but I do not like to intimidate people as that is something I beleive my faith does not teach me. That is why I have provided you with the links but you have obviously not taken effort to read or research any of them. If you want other hard evidence from scholars, I suggest you first start reading and studying all the links I given before debating with me and then research this further through these two books, one is from a female scholar who has studied in Al Ahzar University (it also makes me wonder why there are such few female scholars): Qur'an and Woman: Rereading the Sacred Text from a Woman's Perspective by Amina Wadud (Islamic Scholar) Believing Women" in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur'an by Asma Barlas Origins of Hijab Context of Hijab Headscarf & Veiling A Critic upon Jilbab Splitting Hair to Cover Hair Must a Woman Wear a Jilbab? Hijab Has Nothing to do With Morality The Qur'an Does Not Mandate Hijab Misinterpretation of Quranic Verses on Hijab Thoughts on Hijab By Sr. Ruqaiyyah Waris Maqsood So it is not right to make women who are not wearing a headscarf feel they are unchaste by making yourself appear more holier than them. Read the Quran verse very carefully and think about what type of people Allah swt considers pious. No one has the right to force women how to dress or dictate to others how to follow the path of Islam or how women should dress. You have no right to tell me which shcolar I should follow. I do not follow any scholar but the Quran and the Messenger. I use my fitra and my conscious and see which is the most Islamic opinion and follow that. Most importantly Scholars are not infallible, they are not those we worship. And Allah swt has told us to use our intelligence and to refer to the Prophet or the Quran if we disagree. Also not all people who have not got a degree in Islamic studies from Qatar or Saudi are lacking in sense or intelligence. In the end our duty is to obey Allah and the Messenger. As long as feel we are doing our duty and we are dressed decently and not hurting others, that is what matters. There is no compulsion in religion. This is clear from the Quran passages and from the Prophet's life. O you Children of Adam! We have bestowed on you raiment to cover your shame as well as to be an adornment to you. But the raiment of righteousness, that is the best. Such are among the Signs of Allah, that they may receive admonition.” (Quran 7:26) Laa ikraaha fi-d-deen. Qad tabayyana ar-rushdu min al-ghayy There is no compulsion in religion. Wisdom has been made distinct from the untruth. (2;256) The Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) has said that Islam is a religion of the middle path (Wast). The Qur'an has called the Muslim nation 'Ummat al-Wusta'. وَكَذَلِكَ جَعَلْنَاكُمْ أُمَّةً وَسَطًا لِتَكُونُوا شُهَدَاءَ عَلَى النَّاسِ وَيَكُونَ الرَّسُولُ عَلَيْكُمْ شَهِيدًا … (البقرة 143) Thus have We made of you a middle Ummah, that you might be witnesses over the people, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves… ( al-Baqarah 2:143) Wasalam, Fitra
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
26
Registered:
3/18/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 26, 2007 4:47 PM
in response to:
Fitra
|
|
All of the 4 major schools of thought have agreed that it is mandatory. How can you disagree with all of them when they learned from the Prophet (SAW) and his companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and instead, take the opinions of the modern "scholars" with the typical fast-food-fatwas many of them give? You're right, the women of the time used to wear scarfs on their head and just leave it trailing down their backs. That's why the verse tells them to drape it over their chests. If you have a scarf on your head already and you take part of it to drape it over your chest, what would you get? A hijab! Why would Allah tell the women to cover their heads if they already were covering? He simply told them to go further and wrap the cloth that was already there back to cover their chests which would then cover their ears and neck in the process. Arabic is a rich language with many meaning for words. The meaning of Khymar means "top cover." That's a covering for the head. You said yourself that scholars are not infallible yet you have quoted scholars and are relying on their opinions against the OVERWHELMING amounts of opposing opinions by not only more reputable scholars but the 4 major schools of thought. And more than a couple of the scholars aren't even native Arabic speaker yet you use their translation of Arabic over native speakers' translations. You have quoted many scholars, yes. But the ones that oppose this view FAR outnumber them to be incomparable. You have chosen to go with the minority view instead of the majority which is what we have been told NOT to do by the Prophet (SAW) and what's worse is that you are spreading your opinion to Muslims that might not know any better. Either way, I've spoken out about what is wrong. The Prophet (SAW) warned women that if they are dressed but naked (not attired properly) that they will not even SMELL Paradise. I've fulfilled what I'm required to as a Muslim. You are entitled to keep your opinion but I am required as a Muslim to speak out when a Muslim is doing something against the Sunnah and Quran. I am not trying to force you to wear hijab. There is no compulsion in religion, that's right but there are commands from Allah that we have to follow. It is up to you if you want to use your concience to tell you what is required however, that is not reliable since we can't tell what is speaking to us, our concience, our nafs or shaytan. That is why we were given explicit orders by Allah and one of those is khymar (top cover) and hijab (screen). It's up to you if you follow it or not. Insha'Allah I have done my part to encorage good and forbid evil. I'm done with the discussion. Asalaamu alaikum Nichole
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
350
Registered:
6/20/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 26, 2007 7:23 PM
in response to:
MaisMuslimah
|
|
To Mais Muslimah or Nichole, You are obviously a convert, right? Do you know me? Have you met me? Have you seen me? The answer is obviously no. I follow Allah, His book the Quran, His Prophet and I am a Muslim. It is therefore totally unislamic for you to say to me or to any other sister that I am leading myself and others to Hell, just because I have an alternative opinion on the headscarf to you or because I do not follow your choice of scholars. I have been a Muslim all my life and none of my Muslim sisters have ever insulted or degraded, or condemned me to Hell. You are not in the position to pass personal judgements about my Faith as only Allah (swt) has that exclusive right & He is the final Judge whether or not my religion is as you say "watered down." 1. First of all, as a Muslim you should know that we are entitled to have different views and as long as we are obeying our Creator and not going against the Quran or Sunnah then it is no one's right to intimidate, abuse, condemn or hold in contempt or curse another believer to Hell. 2. As Muslims, we have rights and duties in how we interact and treat one another. You should know that in Islam, Muslims should love one another for the sake of Allah and that the Prophet pbuh warned Muslims of having contempt for one another. Also in the Quran Allah swt told us to be united and not to quarrel (8:46). 3. Just because a Muslimah may not wear a headscarf does not mean she is not pious or that she is naked or will go to Hell. Your claim is unfounded. No where in the Quran or any hadith did Allah swt or the Prophet condemned any woman who did not cover her hair by saying that she is naked or will go to hell. 4. You base nakedness on uncovering the head, when neither the Prophet said this, nor in the Quran did Allah swt reveal any verse which says that women must cover the head or the hair, so your argument is baseless. Allah told women to cover their chests, He did not mention the hair. 5. Men uncover their hair but they are not naked, yet the Prophet also wore a khimar (a covering) on his head, ever thought why men don't cover and follow his sunnah? Yet, when women uncover their hair according you, they are naked? There is no logic in that. A woman wearing a black headscarf is no different than one one who isn't covering her head or hair. That hadith you quoted, is about thickness of clothes, it's about not wearing sheer, see-through clothes, and not looking indecent on the streets so that every man will turn his face- do you understand? 6. Islamic thought comes from two bases the Quran and the Sunnah and if anyone follows those then they are safe. Allah swt has always addressed modesty, chastity and piety. Do you know what these terms mean or not? Muslim women should lengthen their garments over their persons in verse 33:59, and they can relax this code in verse 24:60. The only verses that specify the covering the parts of the women's body, are in verse 24:31, which is covering the chest and 7:26 covering the private parts for both males and females. Covering the chest with the khimar in 24:31 means women should use a covering (khimar) to cover the chest. The articles I posted above explain the definition in great detail. All of the hadiths you have quoted have nothing about covering the hair. One hadith is weak and has a missing chain as I said before, for which I have given you links to check up earlier but you still have not done so. If the scholars are reading this then they know which hadith I am referring to. 7. You say, how can I disagree with the four schools of thought? Because I worship Allah and follow Prophet Muhammad pbuh, not scholars or other men. Your claim that all four schools of thought enforce women to cover their heads and say it is mandatory, is wrong and incorrect. For a start, the four schools of thought are not in the position of the Prophet or Allah's verses in the Quran and they have not made the headscarf into such an issue as you have. Secondly the scholars of the four schools of thought were clearly humble. We should learn from their humility as they never forced any woman to cover her head, in fact these scholars would wake up in their grave if they saw two Muslims fighting over an issue that is not obligatory yet treated like the central pillar of Islam - understood? 8. As explained before, you have quoted incorrect hadiths that have nothing to do with covering the hair or head and neither have you read or researched any of the links from other scholars or other Islamic sites that I have posted above. Why don't you write to each one of the scholars that I had mentioned and ask them why they have different opinions? I am sure they will enlighten you, though I must add that Dr Zaki Badawi has passed away may Allah forgive him and have mercy on him, so you may not be able to contact him for references, but you should be able to find his and other sources easily from the internet. 9. Remember everyone in this forum are reading our comments and Non-Muslims have made it clear the type of arrogance that they dislike in Muslims, your anger and hostility and lack of understanding towards me about this sensitive subject is a catalyst, so we should use our self control and use our wisdom and sense as well as Islamic adab and sources to solve issues and not make matters worse for each other or other Muslims suffering from the wars because of our behaviors. This, in it self is huge lesson that we should not take for granted. 10. I did not come here for a heated debate or to quarrel with you, as that is also prohibited in the Quran (see 8:46), but since you have made these false allegations and have condemned me to Hell before you have even met me or others, then I felt I had to make it clear so that the same mistake does not happen in this thread to others. I hope from Allah it will be an atonement for me for the hereafter. Finally, let us learn from this experience and practice the essentials of Islam first the Islamic adab from the Prophet's Character, before we make covering of the hair on the head into the central pillar of Islam even when our Lord and Creator of the Worlds has not done so. O you Children of Adam! We have bestowed on you raiment to cover your shame as well as to be an adornment to you. But the raiment of righteousness, that is the best. Such are among the Signs of Allah, that they may receive admonition.” (Quran 7:26) He alone knows that I have spoken the truth. Wasalam Fitra
|
|
|
 |
Posts:
350
Registered:
6/20/07
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jun 26, 2008 8:48 AM
in response to:
Ubuntu
|
|
To, Mais Muslimah aka Nicole, You are incorrect the 4 schools of thought were no way around the time of the prophet pbuh, they came much later on. Yes, scholars are not infallible & I posted the names of those scholars for your benefit as only you seem to be the one arguing the most in favor of following scholars. I try my best worship Allah swt and follow the prophet, but who do you worship? The four schools of thought? Majority of scholars? What if they were wrong or incorrect? And where is your evidence that they said wearing the headscarf is "mandatory"? Allah swt says in the Quran: "And if you disagree about anything you should refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day." 4:59 How can the 4 major schools who just happen to be men, who incidentally have excluded the opinion of majority Muslim women scholars? What happened to those female scholars? Yes our scholars were humble, they stated that if they did said anything that was contrary to the Quran and sunnah for us to follow only what Allah revealed and the sunnah of our Prophet. However they can never replace our prophet pbuh or that of Allah's words in making decisions. Now, WHERE is the evidence either from the Quran and the sunnah of the prophet, that Muslim women should have to wear head-scarves? It is not necessary that if you have a scarf on your head already that you take part of it to drape it over your chest and that would be classed as a hijab! First, understand the meaning of the word 'hijab', no where is it mentioned to have a headscarf as a hijab over your head in the Quran. You forget the main verse which states explicitly to use the covering, Khimar over the chest. The Islamic hijab is neither the khimar or the headscarf, the hijab was the screen which was for MEN to be behind it (sitr - curtain) this was when entering the prophet's home as men used to walk straight into the women's private quarters such as their bedrooms! The mosque was adjacent to the prophet's house. Read the tafsir of the hijab verse! The jilbab is a long loose outer clothing such as a coat to cover the whole body, but not necessarily for the hair! There are numerous ways to drape the khimar which is not necessarily a scarf. You can drape a khimar from the neck down as a dress, or wear a blouse etc. Even if teh khimar was a scarf then there are literally loads of different methods of wearing a scarf. a) A woman who wasn't wearing a scarf may have just used any piece of cloth to cover her chest, or could have easily sewed up her dress to cover her bosom. Or she could have got a top or a dress and worn it to cover her chest. b) A woman who was wearing a thin, see-through scarf loosely over her head (no doubt they had see-through clothes in those days, there is a hadith on this issue) must have wrapped it (several times) to cloud her chest with it. c) A women who had a thick shawl, may have wrapped that up or she may have chosen to cover all over her head or chest. d) A women who was wearing a shorter khimar on her head may not have had it long enough to cover both her head or chest and so could have just covered her chest with it and left her hair open. Do you know how long a headscarf needs to be in order to cover the whole head and the chest? It needs to be a really long sheet about 2 yards long at least! Then why aren't the majority of Muslim women today covering their heads necks and chest with the a piece of cloth over their heads and chest if it was mandatory as you say? Why don't they take a huge long sheet and wear it this way all the time? Why do they wear a hijab and leave their necks open, or have short sleeve dresses, or wear tight jeans, or just cover the head with it, while their dress/jilbab covers the rest? And why would wearing niqab be optional? It would be obligatory, as the prophet's wives did it! But since there are hadiths which talk about Muslim women uncovering their faces, then there are also hadiths about women uncovering their hair. In fact, late Sh. Bin Bas (may Allah swt rest his soul in peace), knew of this fact that there were Muslim women at that time who were not wearing the headscarf over their head and the only reason why Saudi is pushing it was encourage good moral standards! Men are using another verse of the Quran, to justify pressurizing women to wear it! But wearing a headscarf is not obligatory according to the Quran or sunnah as no covering of the hair is mentioned either by Allah swt or our prophet pbuh! The khimar is not necessarily meant to be a scarf or a complete headscarf, it can be any covering, because that is what it means. Remember that women weren't even covering their heads so there is no evidence that you can say that khimar has to cover every strand of hair. You forgot to mention there were also women who were not wearing any khimar at all and many who had it around their necks and so the hair was hardly covered. So how do you justify covering the hair by it? You're contradicting about the khimar, the women were not already covering their heads, you yourself admitted it was loosely around their heads and backs. A khimar means a covering, any covering, it is not a name that is specific to a certain piece of cloth worn during those days to cover every inch of hair, and even if it was, the khimar could also have been anything else, such as a dress, a sock, a sheet, a shirt, a table cloth. There were women without a khimar or a scarf, there were women who wore it only to cover their chests while others covered their whole selves! Even alcohol is 'khamr' also from 'khimar' because it clouds the mind. Allah swt told us to use khimar over our chests and to lengthen our garments (jilbab), because women when they went to relieve themselves out side bared all! Yes Arabic is rich language, it's time you understood it rather that manipulate it to suit only your opinions. In fact the khimar means ANY covering and the command is to drape THAT COVERING onto the chest (not the head). There were plenty of women who were not using that covering for their hair, but for their necks, and some with none at all, so how do you justify that it means only a headscarf which should also cover the hair? Where is the evidence form the Quran and hadith of the prophet that it was meant that way? I take it literally as it says in the Quran, I try my best not mix up and add my own words or opinions because only Allah swt knows the real meaning of His verses. If Allah swt wanted us to cover our hair, Allah swt would have made it easier by revealing it or our Prophet would have told us to cover our hair. There would have been ample number of hadiths of the prophet on this issue and so far I have found NONE. The verse from the Quran that the Saudis use is to 'promote good and forbid evil' yet there is no evil in showing one's natural hair which appears ordinarily (men do it even though their hair is attractive to many women) and there is no proof in the Quran or sunnah that a woman must cover their hair! About "explicit orders" that a khimar is a headscarf only an opinion. Please go back to the linguistics of the meaning of khimar, it means a cover any covering. A top can be a dress, after all the command is to put that top, drape it or cover it on to the chest, not the hair and the chest!! There is no Arabic word in the Quran to suggest women should wear their tops over their heads in a perfect manner as you mention so that no hair is shown and then drape it on the chest. The command is to just drape this khimar over their bosoms! It is therefore wrong to manipulating Allah's words and the Quran and say something that is not there. A headscarf is certainly not a the hijab, the sitr, the curtain to separate women's living quarters, during the prophet's time. The debate about veiling and the head scarf has been there since immemorial! There were scholars even in ancient times who disagreed with the headscarf and FYI, Hamza Yusuf himself stated that Umar RA banned the headscarf so then how can it be a sin? No doubt Umar banned it probably because chauvinist men must have tried making it 'mandatory' on women creating a new bida, which it now is, as there is no evidence either in the Quran or the sunnah of the prophet for women to completely cover their hair! How about what the peripatetic Ibn Battuta, a Moroccan Berber scholar and jurisprudent from the Maliki Madhhab (a school of Fiqh, or Sunni Islamic law), a Qadi or judge, best known as a traveler and explorer, had to say about Turkish women - "A remarkable thing I saw in this country was the respect shown to women by the Turks for they hold a more dignified position than the men...I saw also the wives of merchants and in general most men. Their faces are displayed for the Turkish women do not veil themselves and sometimes a woman will be accompanied by her husband so anyone seeing him would take him as one of her servants..." Here are illustrations on Muslim dress in the Al-Andalus of the 13th century: In Mali, West Africa, Ibn Battuta observed ... "Their women are of surpassing beauty, and are shown more respect than the men. These people are Muslims, punctilious (very exact, never late) in observing the hours of prayer, studying the books of law, and memorizing the Qur'an. Yet their women show no bashfulness before men and do not veil themselves, though they are assiduous (worked hard) in attending prayers. http://www.sfusd.k12.ca.us/schwww/sch618/Clothing/Islam_Clothing,_Jewelry_Ma.html As for modern day scholars, you can not judge their iman. Our prophet pbuh said in his last sermon: "All those who listen to me shall pass on my words to others and those to others again; and may the last ones understand my words better than those who listen to me directly." And since you have still not provided me with one authentic hadith to say that it is mandatory for Muslim women to cover their heads, I can not agree with you that headscarf is obligatory. Don't forget that men are told to lower their gaze, this is pointless if women have to cover so much that they lose in touch of themselves and who they are. Just think of the hardship and oppression and the psychological effect on women wearing the headscarf for the rest of her life even when she goes grey. Surely there must be hundreds of hadiths if the Prophet commanded women to cover their hair if it were obligatory, so why can't we find even one? Allah swt said in the Quran he made our deen easy for us. In fact you need to use your conscious and decide who are you obeying. Is it Allah and the prophet or something else, like your nafs? Use your common sense for Allah's sake when there is no evidence available and when the headscarf is forced on to women by men and appears to be more beautiful and submissive to men than ordinary hair then what is it's purpose? It's obviously only there to infatuate, egoistic and chauvinist men, who don't want to lower their own lustful gaze as specified in the Quran. I am not here for a further heated debate, and I am not going to repeat what's been said, so I suggest you read my earlier post and search the links I provided which have ample info on this subject. I apologise for having to repeat my self at a later date because there was something wrong with the server and I could not find a couple of my posts on this thread and had to re-write it again. Insha Allah, I have tried to manifest the truth about the headscarf as not being an 'obligatory' part of the 'Islamic' tradition, whereas dressing and covering modestly is, of course there is nothing wrong in Muslim sisters choosing to cover their hair and that is their choice in how they perceive modesty and Allah swt rewards our actions, according to teh bets of our intentions.
May Allah swt guide us all to accept His truth, ameen.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Re: Redefining Our Womanhood
Posted:
Jul 3, 2008 6:12 PM
in response to:
Ubuntu
|
|
Assalamoalykum, In defense of Niqab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Copyright . 1999-2009 Islam Online All rights
reserved - Disclaimer |
| |