ÚÑÈí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

Iraqi Opposition Delays Anti-Saddam Meet For “Technical Reasons”

Talabani: The aim is to “conceive a joint vision for the next Iraqi regime” after Saddam 

DUBAI, November 14 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - A rift-plagued conference of six Iraqi opposition groups set for November 22-25 in Brussels has been delayed for two weeks for “technical reasons”, a newspaper reported Thursday, November 14.

Arabic daily Al-Hayat quoted a source on the organizing committee saying “numerous delegates mainly from Arab countries” had difficulties obtaining visas to enter Belgium, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reported.

Preparations were however well under way, the same source said, adding that a hall had been hired and security arranged for gathering intended to forge a common position on a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq.

The Belgian foreign ministry announced Wednesday, November 13, that representatives of the Iraqi National Congress (INC), the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) had applied for permission to hold the conference next week.

“We told them that such gatherings do not require authorization in Belgium, provided they are held on private property and respect public order,” a foreign ministry spokesman said.

The Belgian authorities were not involved with the conference planned for a Brussels hotel, he added.

The meeting brings together the three groups plus the Iran-based Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), the Iraqi National Accord Movement and the Constitutional Monarchy Movement.

The aim is to “conceive a joint vision for the next Iraqi regime”, after Saddam, according to PUK chief Jalal Talabani as U.S. war plans to oust the Iraqi president gather pace.

U.S. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said Tuesday, November 12, that Washington was “not unduly concerned” by the rifts in the fractured Iraqi opposition.

“This is obviously an important event and it is not unusual that there should be differences of opinion as well as high hopes and expectations,” Boucher said.

“Nevertheless, we are confident that free Iraqis everywhere can together fashion a common vision for their country’s future.”

A prominent Iraqi dissident Kanan Makiya, wrote to the U.S. State Department, which backs the six groups, decried the Brussels last week as a “power grab.”

In October, the leader of PUK, Jalal Talabani said that he opposed a plan being mulled by the Washington to install an American governor in a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq.

“It is the genuine Iraqi opposition forces that must form an interim government and organize elections in which the Iraqi people would choose their representatives,” AFP quoted Talabani as telling the Dubai-based Saudi-owned MBC satellite television.

“We do not support any action that does not give the Iraqi people the full choice (to decide how they should be governed), and we will not support an invasion that imposes on us a government from outside, even if it is democratic,” he stressed.

U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell confirmed on October 11 that Washington was considering installing a military occupation government in Baghdad, one of several contingency plans being worked on as U.S. officials prepare for possible military action to oust Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

The proposed government would be along the lines of those imposed in post-World War II Germany and Japan.

The New York Times reported earlier the same day that Washington had a plan for the occupation of Iraq that calls for a U.S.-led military government and war-crime trials for Iraqi leaders.

The plan includes a transition to an elected civilian government in Iraq that could take months or years, it reported, citing unnamed senior administration officials.

The initial role of Iraqi opposition forces in a post-Saddam government would be scaled back, the paper said.

The plan would put an American military commander in charge of Iraq - perhaps General Tommy Franks, commander of U.S. forces in the Gulf - for a year or more while the United States and its allies searched for and destroyed Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction, according to the Times.

Yesterday's News

Advanced Search

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

Related Links


News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map