VIENNA,
October 18 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Iraq and North Korea are
"both priorities" for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),
said its Director Mohamed El-Baradei on Friday October 18.
"They
are both countries where we have a mandate to ensure that they do not
develop nuclear weapons and both are of equal priorities to us,"
Agence France-Presse (AFP) quoted El-Baradei as telling reporters at his
headquarters in Vienna.
International
inspectors could evaluate North Korea's nuclear weapons producing
capacity "pretty soon" with both the Asian nation and Iraq now
top priorities for the IAEA, he added.
"From
a technical point of view, we would like to make sure that both Iraq and
North Korea are free from nuclear weapons because they have an
obligation not to produce nuclear weapons," said the IAEA chief.
He
said determining which country was more dangerous was "a political
assessment, looking at not just if they have weapons but whether in fact
they are going to use these weapons."
El-Baradei
said the international approach to both these states was the same,
namely to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons, but "with
different emphasis."
The
United States stressed Thursday October 17, that Iraq and North Korea
were not comparable, despite the fact that both could now possess
weapons of mass destruction after this week's disclosure of Pyongyang's
nuclear weapons program.
While
Iraq remains the target of possible military intervention, either
unilaterally by the U.S. or under U.N. auspices, should it inhibit U.N.
arms inspections, both the U.S. state and defense departments made clear
they intended to take the "peaceful" route, in consultation
with allies, in dealing with North Korea.
The
U.S. administration on Wednesday October 16 revealed that North Korea
was now a nuclear power, with a developed weapons research program and
at least two nuclear bombs, after Pyongyang made the admission to a
visiting U.S. official two weeks ago.
Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld acknowledged Pyongyang's nuclear capability
but refused to even envision a "preventive strike" against
North Korea of the type being mulled for Iraq to overthrow the regime of
Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.
Rumsfeld
side-stepped a question on the differences between the Iraqi and North
Korean regimes.
He
argued it would be superfluous to send weapons inspectors to North
Korea, in contrast to those bound for Iraq.
State
Department spokesman Richard Boucher similarly stressed Thursday October
17, that "there's not one policy that fits all. Each situation has
to be dealt with on its own. We want to deal with this situation
peacefully with regard to North Korea. And we'll make the appropriate
decisions."
General
Richard Myers, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the same
briefing that U.S. forces would be capable of dealing with crises in
both Iraq and North Korea simultaneously.
However,
he noted, "We have no indications right now that anything unusual
is going to occur necessarily in North Korea, and ... we don't have a
presidential decision" for military intervention in Iraq.
Iraq
would probably be unable to hide a nuclear weapons program if it allowed
international inspectors back into the country, the IAEA chief asserted.
He
also said that once inspectors were set up in Iraq, their very presence
would be a deterrent to the country developing nuclear weapons, said.
"It
is difficult for them to hide" a nuclear program, El-Baradei told
reporters.
He
said this was "providing of course that we have full-fledged
inspections because nuclear (products) always have a signature. We can
always see traces ... if they used highly enriched uranium or
plutonium."
El-Bbaradei
said the inspectors would carry out such measures as environmental
sampling, gamma radiation surveys from helicopters, internal periodic
visits to all capable sites and "interviewing all the former
nuclear scientists to make sure that they are not working in the nuclear
program."
El-Baradei
said he hoped U.N. weapons inspectors would be returning to Iraq
"within the next few weeks" once the U.N. Security Council
passes a new resolution on the inspections.
He
said the inspectors would have free access to all sites and that he
expected this would apply also to presidential palaces, a sore point
that caused the inspections to be halted in 1998.
El-Baradei
said that in his "estimation" the limitations on visiting
sites that the Security Council has agreed to "would be knocked
down by (the new) Security Council resolution (stating) that everything
in Iraq should be subject to immediate, unfettered access."
The
Security Council has been meeting in open session to discuss the Iraq
issue ahead of a crucial vote on the conditions under which U.N. weapons
inspectors will return to Baghdad, which they left in 1998, to verify
Iraqi assertions that it has no nuclear, chemical or biological weapons