The
Qur’an was revealed for the acquisition of good
character, not for chanting written chapters. It
is not difficult to find examples of increasingly
materialistic, grasping, self-obsessed, and
self-serving behavior in our society, in which
there are many signs of regression by adults into
infantile behavior. Such signs include the very
obvious expressions of rage and insatiable greed
which are a disfigurement and debasement of the
true nature of the human being.
In
this climate, students need, above all, role
models of adult behavior who actively embody in
their lives a conception of what a true human
being is, in its totality. For people of faith,
this is a spiritual matter, but for others who may
not hold any spiritual beliefs it still operates
at the level of an ethical or moral vision, a
belief in standards of conduct which are not
abandoned because of the effort or will needed to
uphold them, nor for the sake of pandering to
lower standards because that is what everybody
else does in today’s world.
In
a climate of self-interest, it is schools which
are increasingly going to have to counter the
negative trends in society, and schools which
promote the highest standards of conduct and
character, which demand the best of what a human
being can be, and at the same time engage in a
process of education which makes students think
and feel why such conduct is better—these are
the schools which responsible parents are going to
want to send their children to, not the ones which
merely promise advantage, achievement, and success
above all other things. But policies cannot
ultimately achieve this; it is only a common
vision, shared values, and consistent application
of principles and policies by every member of
staff which creates and sustains these standards.
I
would emphasize also that the introduction of
Citizenship into the curriculum, while a step in
the right direction, may not go far enough. The
objective of Islamic education, and, indeed, all
systems of education which are based on an
understanding of the full potential of the human
being, is to produce a good and complete man or
woman (in the sense of balanced intellectual,
moral, and spiritual excellence, with refinement
of culture and character), not merely a compliant
citizen of a secular state.
The
notion of “citizen” here reflects the British
government White Paper, Schools: Achieving
Success, which, as I have already pointed out,
regards “the success of children at school” as
being “crucial to the economic health and social
cohesion of the country.” Social cohesion is
undoubtedly important, as long as it is not
founded on mono-cultural conformity, but rests on
the respect for diversity, inter-faith tolerance
and inter-cultural sensitivity which is an element
of the Citizenship program. Faith schools, whether
single-faith or inter-faith, as well as secular
schools which teach religious education,
contribute to this process by showing how the
development of character and ethical values also
goes beyond utilitarian citizenship and is based
ultimately on our correct spiritual relationship
to God (adab), not merely on a functional
relationship to the state.
It
is vital, however, that faith schools show how
this concept of the precedence of God does not
have to be associated with a severe clash of
loyalty between the secular state and religious
beliefs. This is especially important in the
context of the current fears about a
“segregated” mentality, disaffected youth
(wrongly associated with faith schools) and
extremists engaged in a war against the West
(whose anti-secularism is seen to emanate from
religious instruction).
I
would offer one caveat: I doubt if there are any
“secular” schools which have a mission which
does not include a moral dimension, if not a
spiritual one. Phillips Exeter Academy in the
United States, for example, has a mission founded
on the idea that Knowledge Without Goodness Is
Dangerous. John Phillips wrote this in his
original deed of gift in 1781: “But above all,
it is expected that the attention of instructors
to the disposition of the minds and morals of the
youth under their charge will exceed every other
care; well considering that though goodness
without knowledge is weak and feeble, yet
knowledge without goodness is dangerous, and that
both united form the noblest character; and lay
the surest foundation of usefulness to mankind.”
This
academy is founded on “humanist,”
“utilitarian” philosophy, and has no explicit
religious orientation, but it cannot be denied
that the above statement accords with one level of
Islamic values, even if it does not encompass the
ultimate source of knowledge and goodness. The
transmission or possession of knowledge without
the appropriate moral and spiritual qualities is
considered dangerous in Islam, too, and Sana’i,
the Persian poet, describes a person having
knowledge without virtue as a “thief.” The
Prophet said, “The worst of men is a bad learned
man, and a good learned man is the best.”
The
emphasis on the “usefulness to mankind” of
knowledge is also wholly consonant with the
supplication of the Prophet that God protect him
from “useless knowledge.” The Prophet also
said, “The knowledge from which no benefit is
derived is like a treasure from which no charity
is bestowed in the way of the Lord.”
Faith
schools should not believe that they have a
monopoly on moral and spiritual values. The most
coveted student prize at the school where for many
years I served as director of studies was not an
academic, cultural, or sports trophy but the one
that was presented last as the climax of the day:
it was for the three C’s, Courtesy,
Consideration, and Community Spirit, and the
school prided itself on the way it fostered these
virtues in all areas of school life.
I
wrote the mission statement for the same school
and it went like this:
“Our
mission is to educate the whole child by providing
unparalleled opportunities in breadth and depth
for the concurrent development of academic,
cultural, spiritual, moral, sporting, and
practical dimensions of school life.”
The
statement goes on to set out the principles
underlying this mission, which include “the
discovery and development of the unique talents
and abilities of each individual” and “a
forward-looking and innovative approach which
reflects our awareness and anticipation of cur
1.
A code of conduct which encourages co-operation,
courtesy and common sense, promotes mutual trust
and respect, and rewards responsible behavior.
2.
A common purpose which actively promotes the
importance of personal, social, moral and
spiritual values.
3.
A climate of open, friendly communication which
creates a vibrant and happy atmosphere.
4.
An awareness of the wider community and the
value and uniqueness of the school environment.
I
once gave a paper on Islamic education at a
conference on Islam and Social Responsibility and
began by displaying this mission statement. No one
in my largely Muslim audience dissented from my
point that this statement, though not explicitly
Islamic, was fully in accord with Islamic
principles. We might object, of course, that this
is the statement of an essentially secular school
paying lip-service to spiritual values, and that
there is no over-arching, spiritual dynamic, no
vertical axis which should inform and permeate all
the horizontal dimensions of human development the
school claims to encompass. This is a valid
objection, and essential to an Islamic
perspective.
Nevertheless,
we need to consider very seriously Al-Attas’s
point (to which I have already referred) that, in
effect, secular Western education systems, with
their core curriculum, are better-rounded than
Islamic curricula. I would actually contest this
generalization at this time in the light of the
progressive narrowing of the curriculum to serve
utilitarian ends which is constricting state
education in many of those Western education
systems and in other countries which have adopted
them or been heavily influenced by them. The best
of secular Western education has been, and still
is, well-rounded and has sustained its commitment
to a broad and balanced curriculum and to the
development of character, but in Britain at least
this kind of education is often only provided by
independent schools which have been able to
preserve relative freedom from the statutory
obligations imposed by the National Curriculum on
state schools. Parents are aware of this, and it
is well known that if independent school fees were
more affordable, their children would be taken out
of the state education system in droves.
My
point here is that faith schools can learn from
the best of secular schools, as well as from each
other, in the way that a well-rounded education,
which encompasses good behavior and refinement of
character, is nurtured in the school community.
Credibility for faith schools is enhanced when
religious values are not merely intoned but
actively expressed in the way people treat each
other. That necessarily implies courtesy and
consideration to all people, of all cultures and
faiths, and all occupations. The Prophet said,
“Kindness is a mark of faith; and whoever has
not kindness has not faith,” and “All God’s
creatures are His family; and he is the most
beloved of God who does most good to God’s
creatures.”