Your Mail

ÚÑÈí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 
 

What Future for Muslim Orphans? An Overview

By Hwaa Irfan

April 10, 2005

Through its Messenger, Prophet Muhammad (himself an orphan), Islam has aimed to safeguard the rights of all members of society, including the rights of the orphans in relation to their birth parents. The means for this is fostering; but with a growing global population of Muslim orphans, does fostering remain the only option when a Muslim child is orphaned due to occupation of his homeland and natural disasters?

Syed Mumtaz `Ali, President of the Canadian Society of Muslims, argues that when a childless couple tries artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization and it fails and leaves them without offspring, they have two further options. If the cause of infertility is the woman, the husband may resort to polygamy and try to have children from his second wife. Otherwise, if the bonding is strong between a couple and another wife is not considered desirable, then they have the option to enjoy the spiritual benefits of this responsibility of caring for an orphan, as if he or she were their own. Adoption or fosterage, the two have become intertwined between policy and practice.

Adoption Today

From the point of the view of the orphan, adoption procedures today can complicate a sense of belonging. In the United States, the National Adoption Information Clearinghouse estimated over 60,000 Americans search for their birth parents or their birth child. Judges will only accept satisfactory grounds to open sealed adoption records. Joan Burns tells us there is no unifying federal legislation that governs access rights to information of birth parents or other birth relatives and adoptees. Some states use an affidavit system, where the concerned parties can place a prior written consent for the release of identifying information into the adoption file. In the meantime, the feeling of belonging eludes the adoptees (Burns). This situation highlights the many justifiable reasons why in Islam the blurring of a child’s birthright is not allowed as in adoption.

[Nor has He made those whom you assert to be your sons your real sons; these are the words of your mouths; and Allah speaks the truth and He guides to the way. Assert their relationship to their fathers, this is more equitable with Allah; but if you do not know their fathers, then they are your brethren in faith and your friends; and there is no blame on you concerning that in which you made a mistake, but (concerning) that which your hearts do purposely (blame may rest on you), and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.] (Al-Ahzab 33:4-5)

Islam in Practice

Fostering has always been the Islamic alternative, with the child to remain legally the child of the birth parents. This is further explained by Dr. Yusuf Al-Qaradawi:

Islam safeguards lineage by prohibiting zina (illegitimate sexual intercourse) and legal adoption, thus keeping the family line unambiguously defined without any foreign element entering into it. It likewise prohibits what is known as artificial insemination if the donor of the sperm is other than the husband.

However, what is the situation for a parentless child? The story of one Egyptian woman, Sayeda (not her real name), who worked as a domestic, highlights the benefits of kafala, (Islamic fostering). It was at the time of the annual pilgrimage and she wanted to fulfill her religious obligations. The bond between her and her employers was more of an extended family rather than an employer-employee relationship. Sayeda worked for a religious family who agreed to take care of her two younger children whilst the older children went on pilgrimage with her. Sadly, whilst on pilgrimage, the coach that Sayeda and her children were in was involved in an accident, and she and her children died. The responsibility for the two younger children in Egypt was an honorable one for this family, who raised them as their own children. No differentiation was made between their own children and Sayeda’s. These two boys have grown to become academically successful at university and have a bright future.

Not all Muslim orphans are so fortunate, and they depend on outside agencies to take responsibility. Contributing to the right of the orphan to maintain contact with their relatives, the Muslim organization Benevolence International Foundation (BIF) provides monthly sponsorship for Afghan orphans at $30 per month. This program also includes Pakistan; the sponsorship is given to the relatives of the orphan to provide for basic needs. For some families, sponsorship may be the only income that they receive. BIF also runs an orphanage school in Sumgait, which arose out of the Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict. Once, they sponsored 648 Chechen orphans, but this had to be suspended due to the increased Russian onslaught. They also provided support for 100 Donxiang Muslim orphans in China.

The Islamic Family Service, New York is contracted by the City of New York and offers family counseling, parenting classes, foster care, and crisis intervention. They work with the courts and provide cultural and professional advice along with their foster care service for Muslim and non-Muslim parents.

Every summer, the Ukrainian Inter-regional Association of Public Organizations (ARRAID) opens a Muslim cultural summer camp for orphaned children in the mosque of Symeiz in the southern Ukrainian Crimea. Dr. Ismail Kadi of ARRAID found that the children attended the summer camp not only to rest, but to learn more about Islamic morals, customs, and traditions.

Across Borders

We have a growing Muslim orphan population as a consequence of war and occupation that has not been resolved, as in Afghanistan, Chechnya, Palestine, Bosnia, Iraq, and so on. Many Muslims around the world wonder what happens to these children, and in some cases, Muslims would like to foster. However, this might lead to what could be considered as adoption, as the children would lose all contact with their homeland and living relatives. Meanwhile, these children are no better off remaining in their war-torn countries, as they may be taken in by their living relatives, but in reality their relatives cannot even provide for themselves, leaving all concerned to be faced with malnutrition, disease, an unsafe environment, and a growing rate of depression and trauma as a consequence of living under perpetual conflict and, in some cases, total displacement.

When Afghanistan was occupied by Russia, thousands of Afghan children were orphaned, many of whom were sent to the Soviet Union for long-term indoctrination. Some were trained as spies and assassins; others were herded into Pakistan to end up living in squalor in refugee camps. In 1984, the Soviet regime launched a program whereby thousands of children aged 6 to 9 years were sent to the Soviet Union for 10 years to study. One Afghan woman recalled, “My brother’s daughter was in that program. She was seven years old, in school. One day she didn’t come home. Each day he went to the school and they said, ‘Come tomorrow.’ After a week, he found out that she was sent to the Soviet Union.” Professor Rasul Amin, formerly of the Kabul University, stated at the time, “These orphan students are sent to the Soviet Union because they don’t have any relatives. The Soviets and the Khad (Afghan secret police) think they will be the hard core of communism in the future. Other children might cry for their mothers and fathers, but these children have no one to cry for.” (Laber)

Within Islamic countries, the mechanisms to deal with their orphaned population relate to Islamic law. For instance in Malaysia adoption is not common. Based on Shari`ah, the process involves more care and consideration. In the last 10 years, only five children have been adopted and have received United States immigration visas based on their adoption by American couples. The procedure is governed by the Adoption Act 257 of 1952, and the child has to be personally identified through a friend or a relative in Malaysia. The adoptive parents must live with and care for the child for not less than three consecutive months before petitioning the courts and high courts for the adoption order. When the application is made, the court appoints a guardian for the child to safeguard the interests of the child before the court. The guardian also investigates the background of the child and the prospective parents. The guardian’s report is presented to the court on the day of the hearing. The court might issue an adoptive order or an interim order, awarding custody of the child to the adoptive parents for a probationary period of not less than six months and not more than two years. Governed by the Registration of Adoptions Act 1952, the child has to be identified personally through friends and relatives in Malaysia as well as through the Social Welfare Department. For foreigners, potential parents are expected to stay in Malaysia for over two years to fulfill the procedures, and generally non-Muslims are not allowed to adopt Muslim children. Those wishing to adopt must live with and must have had continuous custody of the child for not less than two years, providing evidence of maintenance, care, and education with statutory declarations from the biological parents relinquishing parental rights.

Adoption in Bangladesh is also not common. Although a small number of non-Bangladeshi’s are granted adoption, the emphasis is on guardianship or fostering by Bangladeshis. In Iraq, adoption is not allowed and permanent guardianship is not permitted by non-Iraqi’s. In Kazhakistan adoption by foreign adopters does take place, albeit that the rate at which it was taking place has slowed down due to a change in policy.

With the recent tsunami disaster in Indonesia (2004), fears rose with reports of Christian missionaries proselytizing among the victims and trafficking amidst a growing number of orphans. One US-based Christian organization, WorldHelp, amidst the confab and at the request of the Indonesian government, dropped its intention to take 300 orphans from Aceh (a Muslim province) and place them in a Christian orphanage (Cooperman). However, before the tsunami it was possible to simply approach the orphanage, Jakarta Sayap Ibu Foundation, if one wanted to adopt a child, and the process was completed after going through a procedure.

In 1989, there were 8,102 orphans entering America from India, the Philippines, Russia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, and China. This rose to 19,237 in 2001. A total of 147,321 entered during the period 1989 to 2001. From that total, 63,508 orphans came from countries with an established Muslim population. This is a difficult issue when there are Muslim children who may be doomed to a life without hope, except possibly in a home far away from everything that they know (Inter-State). The situation plays on the hearts of those who observe the difficult circumstances that these children face and attracts those who cannot have children or feel that they cannot adopt children in their own countries because children in the care system of the West tend to be older.

The Adoption and Fostering System

Iraqi Orphanage

In the case of Canada, Syed Mumtaz `Ali argues, “Through arbitration, these problems could be resolved easily. … Both laws could be satisfied through negotiations involving both the biological and adoptive parents in order to meet the necessary requirement to provide for the child,” in order to ensure the rights of the Muslim orphan. Previously this occurred outside of the courtroom, diminishing the legal rights of the Muslim under Shari`ah.

Focusing on Britain, orphans have their own problem with a growing orphan population amidst a growing international orphan population. In England alone

  • 61,100 children were in the care of local authorities on March 31, 2004

  • 24,100 children started to be looked after during the year ending March 31, 2003

  • 24,000 children ceased to be looked after during the year ending March 31, 2003

Of those

  • 11% (7,000) of children looked after on March 31, 2004, were living in children's homes

  • 10% (5,900) were living with their parents

  • 5% (3,300) were placed for adoption

  • 68% (41,600) were living with foster carers

  • 6% (3,400) were in other placements such as residential schools, lodgings, and other residential settings (BAAF)

It is believed that there are 200-300 inter-country adoptions in Britain every year as parents send their children to the United Kingdom in hope of a better life for them. Adopters are assessed by British social workers, a panel, and then finally the Department of Health in liaison with the country concerned. Children adopted internationally are in general younger than those orphans in the United Kingdom.

With community pressure, the fostering and adoption laws in Britain have taken a racial stance. From the experience of the black community, the cases of black children who were adopted by white parents and who suffered extreme identity crisis were too numerous to be considered acceptable. Notwithstanding, the Muslim communities are content to see that a white Muslim child be given to a black or Asian Muslim family, but not a black Muslim child placed in a black Caribbean Christian family. Unfortunately, the Race Relations Act has only recognized the racial dimension and not the religious dimension, leading to a form of discrimination. In the British Muslim journal Q-News, a British Muslim journalist iterated the time when he and his wife wanted to adopt a Muslim child of African parentage advertised at the time. They were turned down because “we were not the right shade of brown.” The three-year-old child had been in care for two years already whilst Brent Council in North London searched for African Muslim adoptive parents! Foster Care Plus reports that of 58,000 children in foster care, 10,000 of those are Muslims. The Commission for Racial Equality proposed, with the support of Inner Cities Religious Council, an amendment to the Public Order Act of 1986 to include discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief.

The government initiated a Quality Protects Program in 1998 as a result. They found that of the 150 regional councils in 2000, only 9% upheld very good or good care provision. In addition, a government review found that the process of adoption was slow in recognizing prospective adoptive parents. The blame was placed on the nature of the adoption panels themselves and the delay in completing reports due to a mixed quality of social workers. Dispute arose over delays caused by seeking same-race placements.

British Muslim orphans are a product of marital breakdown, poor mental or physical health of the parents, illegitimacy, abuse, disability; some have been sent to the United Kingdom by relatives because of war or natural disasters elsewhere. To face the growing demand, Britain’s Independent Adoptive Service launched a major campaign to encourage more Muslim parents to come forward as adopters. For example, the early 1990s bore witness to war in Bosnia. In response, Muslim families wanting to adopt Bosnian children inundated Britain’s social services department and Muslim organizations. This was a surprise to the agencies involved, considering that there was a poor response from the British Muslim communities to local Muslim orphans. As a result, the agencies involved refused to facilitate adoption of Bosnian children, pointing to the local Muslim children awaiting adoption. These same parents that came forward to adopt Bosnian children withdrew their offers!

[And they ask you concerning the orphans. Say: To set right for them (their affairs) is good, and if you become co-partners with them, they are your brethren.] (Al-Baqarah 2:220)

Today, the situation has improved a little with a mushrooming of Muslim fostering agencies in the United Kingdom; however some include adoption. Sarah Sheriff of the Association of Muslim Researchers suggested “permanent fostering” as an alternative for Muslims, but this has yet to become a possible viable alternative.

Fostering, long- or short-term, offers several advantages.

  • Long term permanent fostering allows for the children to maintain contact with the birth parents and relatives.

  • Short-term temporary fostering allows for the birth parents/relatives to get back on their feet until they are better able to take care of the child.

  • Fostering teenagers allows for them to cool off in a supportive environment where they can mature emotionally.

  • Fostering disabled children provides a short break for the parents.

Sponsorship allows orphans (especially those in war-torn or disaster regions) to stay in their homeland with relatives by providing financially for the orphans’ upbringing.

If Prophet Muhammad were born today and orphaned again by the age of eight, what chance would there be for Muslims to learn what we still need to learn? Unless we Muslims are ready to stand by our orphaned children through fostering and sponsorship, to support the development of these children to become a part of society with the contributions that they can make, we risk the future of our children and the Ummah in more ways than one, and we weaken the fellowship that Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) provided for all Muslims.

Read Also:

Sources


News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map