|
|
|
Oxford
Muntada was a collaborative project between the Oxford Centre for
Islamic Studies (OCIS) and the British Counci
|
“Ladies
and gentlemen, the Common Room is now closed.” The daily announcement from
the porter at Christ Church College was able to put only a temporary halt to
the conversations among participants at the Oxford Muntada (3 – 30 August
2003), a collaborative project between the Oxford
Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS) and the British
Council. The inaugural Muntada (the word is Arabic for forum)
brought together twenty-five Muslims from all over the world for a month of
dialogue in Oxford. During the meeting, it was often after midnight when
people finally walked back to their rooms past the warm stone walls of
Christ Church College, still talking.
The
participants in this innovative program came from a range of countries: from
Kosovo to Kenya, Bahrain to Britain, and Malaysia to Morocco. The Muntada
formed part of the British Council’s Connecting Futures program, which
creates forums through which the next generation of leaders in the UK and
other countries can engage with one another on important issues facing their
communities.
In
format, the Muntada combined seminars by distinguished professors,
researchers, activists, and NGO officers, with extensive time for questions
and discussions by participants. In addition, the program included visits to
the Foreign Office and the Regent’s Park Central Mosque in London,
attendance at a panel discussion with leading journalists, and special
viewings of the Islamic art holdings in the British and Victoria and Albert
Museums.
Between
the Seminars
|
|
|
The
participants in this innovative program came from a range of countries
|
Perhaps
the most important aspect of the Muntada, however, which did not appear in
its schedule, was the free time between seminars. Over the month, the
Muntada initiated deep friendships among the participants. For most, this
was “the first time to have such contact with Muslims from all parts of
the world,” as Xjabir Hamiti from Kosovo observed. Even the full schedule
of formal sessions at the Muntada could not accommodate the resulting
interest. Participants established other “common rooms” to continue
their interaction. Almahdi Alonto of the Philippines was not surprised.
“There is so much for Muslims to learn about other Muslims in the
world,” he said.
What
might Muslims learn about one another in such a setting?
Professor
James Piscatori, whose seminars on political movements in the Muslim world
were extremely well-received, felt that the seminars would enable a new kind
of exchange. He envisioned that “the Muntada would offer people the
opportunity to meet in a setting removed from their own, hopefully an open,
honest, not combative space, which would allow them push the agenda forward,
to think through the larger issues, without being defensive.”
The
larger questions visited often during the Muntada include the question of
identity, the nature of modernity, the definition of good governance, the
impact of globalization, the future of Islamic education, and media images
of Muslim societies, et cetera.
Relations
between Muslims and the West were a central focus of the Muntada, and
according to Dr. Hassan Abedin of the OCIS, one of its aims was to bring
together Muslims from the West and the Islamic world. This focus was both
very complex and also very successfully achieved in the program.
Yasmeen
Daifallah of Egypt found “the most stimulating and novel dimension I have
encountered in this Muntada is my encounter with Western Muslims. It
countered the stereotype I had. To come here to find that these people have
struck the balance of being part of the whole and yet retaining their own
identity and belief system has been the most profound part of the
Muntada.”
Muhamed
Al-Nurry, who is from the United Arab Emirates, found the status of British
Muslims to be particularly encouraging. “They can be an example for
Muslims around the world, even those in the Islamic countries, because of
the freedoms and the privileges of democracy in Britain.”
Xjabir
Hamiti added that Islam in Europe has a centuries-long history, and that the
Muntada’s focus on Muslims in Britain could usefully be related to Muslim
life in other Western countries.
Another
of the larger questions is the issue of diversity among Muslims. From the
perspective of the OCIS, Dr. Abedin observed, “The desire was to have as
much diversity amongst participants as possible. We wanted representatives
from every Muslim country.” He explained that the value of such diversity
was “to provide exposure to future Muslim leaders to debates, issues,
successes, challenges that we all faced regardless of ethnicity or
culture.”
As
Mohammed Haider Ali of Bangladesh stated, “The main issue is sharing. The
problems will always be there, but there is no particular solution. The
method is always changing.”
To
address such evolving problems presents a challenge to Muslim leaders,
according to Abeer Khraisha of Jordan. It means that “we need the
scholars to be more open, more liberal, more creative,” she asserted.
Dynamic
Diversity
|
|
|
On
the personal level, the depth of friendships among participants is
striking.
|
Diversity
also has another dimension. One question raised often in the course of the
Muntada was the nature of the Ummah (community of Muslims) and the
implications of numerous views on Islam in the Muslim world.
In
a contemporary world which is often fearful of or hostile to Islam, how do
Muslims respond to a diversity of views and perspectives among themselves?
Is diversity to be accepted and even welcomed, or seen as a source of
fragmentation and weakness?
“At
times the differences among Muslim communities are a blessing, but it can
become a point of conflict rather than diversity,” was the view of Abeer
Khraisha.
On
the other hand, the relation of difference to unity raises questions about
dialogue itself. Professor Piscatori noted, “Multi-vocality within Islam
is a fact. The question is, do we allow the validity of multi-vocality?”
Syahrul
Hidayat of Indonesia, too, addressed this theme of many perspectives. He
believes that “the important point of the Muntada is that we Muslims can
learn that we are different from one another. What we have to learn is that
Islam is not monolithic. There are lots of interpretations, four
interpretations of fiqh, for example. We are different, but we can
make relations, cooperation and action from that starting point.”
A
view strongly articulated by representatives from Southeast Asia continued
to engage with the theme of dominant perceptions of Islam. ‘‘I think the
issue of how to see Muslim identity or culture is very important. People
think that Muslim identity is an Arab identity. But is it?” Rahmawati
Hussein of Indonesia asked. In effect, the diversity of origins,
perspectives and cultures among the participants provided a corrective to
the notion that “discussion of Islam means discussion only about the
Middle East,” she continued.
Muslims
and Other Faiths
Another
important theme that arose in discussions is the relation of Muslims to
other faiths and to secularism. In countries like South Africa, Muslims are
a small minority who live alongside people of other faiths within a largely
secular public space, and through mobilization, careful engagement and
negotiation with the state, have moved toward the recognition of Shari`ah in
personal law. The experience of Muslim-majority states in Southeast Asia,
such as Malaysia and Indonesia, is also significant, since they have
substantial non-Muslim minorities.
Syahrul
Hidayat believes that the way in which Indonesians have dealt with this
reality is instructive to Muslims in other parts of the world. “The
characteristic of my country is pluralism. Muslim life in Indonesia is
tolerance. They can tolerate other values.”
Hadeel
Treiki of Libya also addressed the issue of the boundaries of religious
identities. She voiced a concern that to define Muslim identity as having
closed boundaries between the self and the other runs the danger of being
impervious to true exchange and dialogue.
Ibnu
Anshori is certain that such exchange is necessary. “For Muslims around
the world to create communication with the non-Muslim world is very
important.” Offering a different vision of Muslim identity, he believes
that “being Muslim is a process. This means you should appreciate other
people.”
Syahrul
Hidayat outlines a similarly expansive approach, and concludes that in this
way Muslims can contribute valuable perspectives to others, as well as
receive them.
Talal
Malik, who is from Britain, reflected on the promise of further interaction
between Muslims in the West and elsewhere in the Muslim world. “I believe
an intellectual revival in Islam is likely to emerge from an interaction
between Muslim academics in the West and those in more traditional Muslim
societies.”
On
the personal level, the depth of friendships among participants is striking.
Yet, as Syahrul Hidayat pointed out, “If in the future we only make
conversations in email, that is not enough.” At the intellectual and
academic levels, for each of the participants the seminars have spurred
interest in new topics. These have generated potential collaboration on
research projects, for example, on Shari`ah in various contemporary
contexts, on notions of sexuality in Islam, on ethnography, about madrasahs,
and on the varied experiences of both minority and majority Muslim
populations.
At
the final session on Friday, 29 August, delegates thanked the British
Council and the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies for the opportunity to
attend this imaginative and sophisticated program. Many plan individual and
collaborative initiatives to carry forward the momentum established during
the month they spent at Oxford. The alumni from the inaugural Oxford Muntada
will continue their interactions across distance and time-zones. In doing
so, they will create new common rooms across the world.
Gabeba
Baderoon , South African Journalist.