This
is the third entry in the series Letters of Understanding. In an
e-mail-based dialogue, sponsored by IslamOnline.net’s Muslim
Affairs section, American student David Mauldin and Palestinian
student Tasneem Shaer discuss Hamas's victory in the Palestinian
elections and the challenges that the new government faces.
What
do you think of this dialogue? Which argument do you support?
E-mail us your feedback and comments: mideast@islamonline.net
*
February
16, 2006
Dear
David,
Your
last e-mail was demanding because I have little knowledge of
politics. So, please accept my humble answers.
Your e-mail was mainly about Hamas's refusal to recognize Israel
and the results of such a stance. Palestinians have been living
under Israeli occupation for a very long time during which they
have seen death, house demolitions, invasions, etc.; how can one
stand out and says that one recognizes those who has caused one
misery and pain? That would be unacceptable for any human being.
Also,
when you talk about the new Palestinian parliament, the majority
of which is from Hamas, you talk about an entity that represents
a big number of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip,
let alone refugees. So, the recognition of Israel, which was
established on Palestinian land, will mean giving up the rights
of those Palestinians.
The PLO's recognition of
Israel didn't produce positive results.
|
|
I
also think that the previous attempts for ending the conflict
through negotiations with Israel (the PLO's experience of
recognizing Israel) did not produce positive results and gave
the Palestinians none of their rights, which made them
understand that by recognizing Israel, they will gain nothing.
It was made clear by the spokesmen of Hamas that it would not
recognize Israel, no matter what; they are sure that such a step
will not lead to Israel acknowledging the rights of
Palestinians. However, Hamas has expressed its desire to achieve
stability in the region by accepting to have a truce with Israel
for at least 15 years. But, in light of what happened during the
few past months, I think that Israel will not respect such a
truce.
David,
you said that Hamas would lose Western financial aid by failing
to recognize Israel. Well, Hamas has made it clear that it will
not beg the West for money because it is a movement that depends
on itself and on the Arab world. Hamas is totally aware that
Western support can only be gained through accepting whatever
the West pleases. Yet, I find it strange for the West not to
help Hamas financially; Hamas has made it clear that its aim
now, after coming to power, is to spend the money it receives on
industry, health care and education, not on buying weapons to
fight Israel since it was able to buy weapons without Western
money.
Let
me answer your question regarding Fatah's stance on the
existence of Israel. Fatah is part of the PLO, which is the
faction that started the negotiations with Israel. In those
negotiations, it recognized Israel. However, while the PLO
recognized Israel as a state, Israel only recognized the PLO as
a movement.
Finally,
I wanted to assure you that all Arabs understand that the United
States is totally controlled by the paranoia you talked about,
and they know that this paranoia makes Americans look at us as
inferior to them. I believe this has fueled hatred in the hearts
of Arabs towards the United States, which sometimes effects the
way they deal with Americans no matter what their stance on our
cause is. I really hope that this ends because I know that not
all Americans agree with their government's policies. Those
policies are the main cause of hatred.
Tasneem
*****
February
19, 2006
Dear
Tasneem,
Fatah
recognizes Israel! Interesting! Fatah is the movement of Yassir
Arafat, the very symbol of resistance to the Jewish state. Over
the years, Fatah carried out numerous guerilla raids against
Israelis. It also fired innumerable artillery shells into
northern Israel from Lebanon in the 1980’s. And during the
Intifada, the Fatah-affiliated Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade carried
out deadly suicide operations.
And
finally, as you said in a previous email, the Palestinian
Authority, dominated by Fatah, eventually became wrought with
scandal and corruption; the armed groups operated under their
own control and no one had any peace. Yet despite all of this
violence, when the Israelis have a choice between dealing with
Hamas or Fatah they seem to want Fatah so much that they will do
anything — even overthrow an obviously democratic election
that the whole world is aware of — to ensure they get Fatah.
Hamas
has to accept Israel. If Palestinians want to fight for a fair
state, the way to do that is not to ignore Israel.
|
|
Why
Fatah? Yes, Hamas has blood on its hands, lots of red Israeli
blood. This is a fact. But Fatah’s hands are not any cleaner,
not even a lighter shade of red. Yet Israel wants to talk with
them, not Hamas. Why? There are many factors, but I believe it
all begins with Fatah recognizing Israel and Hamas refusing to
do so.
Tasneem,
Hamas has to accept Israel. I am not saying you have to like
Israel. I am not saying you have to legitimize the horrible
things they have done. I am saying that if the Palestinians want
any chance of bringing about their own state, one that is not
imposed on them unilaterally, you have to talk with Israel, and
to talk with them, you have to recognize them. Nothing but
negative statements are coming from Israel and the United States
now concerning Hamas. But I think there is a lesson to be
learned in how the two countries treat Fatah: Accept Israel and
history can be ignored, if not forgiven.
Without
accepting Israel’s existence as a state, and without being
willing to talk with the Israelis, I think it is pointless to
talk about the refugees’ right of return and the long years of
sorrow and pain. Not that the issues are pointless, they are
full of importance, but without accepting Israel the refugees
will stay refugees and the painful history will just continue.
Many believe that Israel is already preparing a Palestinian
state’s territory with the pullout from Gaza and the
construction of the security wall. If Palestinians want to fight
for a fair state, the way to do that is not to ignore Israel.
True,
accepting Israel is a demand of the United States, which is
something Hamas, understandably, loathes doing. However, it
would be good for Hamas to make conciliatory moves in the
current state of the conflict. I am not saying here that Hamas
needs to be a slave to the United States , but rather they need
to recognize that the United States is the only power that can
really pressure Israel to do anything. Certainly, the Arab
states cannot help.
I have never
bought the argument that the Arab world supports the Palestinian
cause, much less Hamas.
|
|
I
may be wrong about this, but I have never bought the argument
that the Arab world supports the Palestinian cause, much less
Hamas. Oh, no doubt, they give the Palestinians money, but true
support for their cause seems to be lacking. The Palestinians
are not really welcomed anywhere except for Jordan, and the Arab
countries just seem to use the Palestinians as a stick with
which to hurl insults at Israel once in a while. But what most
convinces me that the Arab world is not something to put much
faith in is the fact that Palestinian resistance came down to
young men and women blowing themselves up. I accept the suicide
bombers to be a form of resistance, but the fact that resistance
had to come to such measures is sick.
I
have been to other places in the world where people are heavily
oppressed, but the people in those places do not blow themselves
up because they still have some hope. It seems that life in the
territories got so hopeless that the only way to resist was to
detonate oneself. Immense blame for what has happened in
Palestine is justly put on Israel and the United States. But the
Arab world never did anything either. So when the Arab world
isn’t blamed, but rather said to be a source of support, I get
confused.
But
I think that with Hamas’s election victory, hope is revived. I
think the reason previous recognition of Israel brought nothing
of value for the Palestinians (Fatah did okay of course) was
that there was no security in the Occupied Territories and
suicide bombers and rockets were hitting Israeli targets.
Israel
is as paranoid about security as is the United States, and does
not seem to be interested in negotiating fairly if it feels
threatened. But now, one of the groups making the security
situation unstable in the past, the most powerful one, has
entered politics. I believe Hamas can secure the territories,
and that this, coupled with recognition of Israel, will be good
in that it will provide both political breathing space and
goodwill points for Hamas and the Palestinians as a whole.
I
know that Hamas does not care about goodwill points from the
West. But in order to operate in the political world
effectively, they have to learn that democracy requires not
acting with disregard to the feelings and needs of others. If
you act purely out of self-interest, difficulty always comes.
The United States forgot that important lesson and now it is a
country with deep problems. And oh yeah, Iraq is a mess. What do
you think of all this?
David