Forcing democracy on Muslims is like jumping from the frying pan into the fire. |
|
I
agree with Mr. Philips about the ongoing turmoil in the Muslim
world. Most Muslims are still not aware that their superiority
in the past was very much connected to their strong adherence to
Islam. Muslims worldwide are not practicing Islam as it was
revealed, and this has left them corrupted, weak, and
easily manipulated by enemies. Muslims nowadays are no
different from the rest of the world, because they abandoned the
real teaching of Islam.
Unfortunately,
this problem cannot be solved by offering Muslims US-style
democracy, which is a system of fluff and no
substance, and has raised a lot of problems in its country
of origin. It can only be solved by giving Muslims the full
right to practice the Qur'an, the best manual for life.
The
idea of forcing democracy on the Muslim
world is like forcing Muslims to jump from
the frying pan into the fire, because democracy doesn't provide
solutions on how to treat spiritually deprived people.
Congrats
to IOL for making the debate more balanced and factual this
time.
Nur
Fatiha Kamarzaman
Medical student
Australia
Jan 5, 2006
Muslims are the only people on earth that blame their problems on the West. |
|
I
think the US invasion of Iraq will eventually be a good thing
for Arabs and Muslims. Muslims are the only people on earth that
blame their problems on the West. For example, you don't hear
China say its Israel or the Global Zionists, or America.
I
am against people of all faiths dying, but Muslims are the ones
who asked for this. Apparently, as long as there is no external
influence to change how Muslims perceive the world, the
Palestinian-Israeli struggle will never end, and we will have
endless Islamic terrorism throughout the world.
I
support the US efforts to improve the Middle East, because it's
obvious that Muslims failed to reform themselves.
A
Leadership of a country reflects its own citizens. No one
Muslim country today is able to live peacefully with non-Muslims
without the interference of a secular Arab leader
or non-Muslim presence.
T.
B.
Jan 3, 2006
Muslims
are not blameless. |
|
To
all my American and European friends, Islam fully supports
democracy. But the democracy and freedom Islam represents is
firstly for the good of the whole community of man (not just
Muslims) then the rights of the individual.
The
democracy that America wants to subjugate on the Muslim
countries is not really democracy. It is to control and
subjugate others.
When
Americans and some European nations wake up to the war crimes
their leaders have committed, it may be too late. Just like the
Germans had to bury the dead in the concentration camps, the
Americans and Europeans will also be forced to bury the millions
of dead Muslims they will have murdered in the name of
"democracy."
The moral of the story is: war is not the answer. |
|
Muslims
are not blameless. Their countries have the worst records of
all. If you criticize the policies of the leader of most Muslim
countries, you and your family may disappear. And that is why,
after Saddam had brutalized the Iraqis for 30 years, the Iraqis
welcomed anyone, including American mercenaries dressed as
civilized heroes.
No
Muslim nation is actually practicing Islam in it's pure form.
Islam doesn't condone random killing, even if it is for an
ideal, like setting up a Caliphate.
The
solution is fairly simple. Muslims must start living Islam
properly, respect people of other religions, engage in civilized
and respectful dialogue with them, and pretty soon everyone will
see the beauty of Islam through the Muslims.
The
first generation of Muslims spread Islam from Morocco to China,
and from Africa to the heart of Europe. The American's can't
control Iraq and Afghanistan with 200,000 soldiers. But the
Muslims of the first generation influenced millions of people,
from Morocco to Afghanistan, with only 100,000 people, and most
of them poor farmers and traders.
So,
the moral of the story is: war is not the answer.
Jami
Jan
1, 2006
May
the Almighty bring an everlasting peace to this troubled world.
James
Phillips used his initial piece to try and polish the US' image,
now tarnished almost beyond repair by US policies towards Arabia
in particular and the Muslim world in general. He tries to
portray US involvement in Muslim-majority countries as being
motivated by goodwill.
In
the case of Somalia, which I am very familiar with, the US'
fight against the spread of communism contributed to leading
Somalia to the ruin it is in today, even through its so-called
aid, as explained by Michael Maren, an American Jew, in his book
The Road to Hell. Somali farmers, who were capable of
producing far more than the country needed, were put out of
business by excessive foreign aid imports.
Atrocities
committed by the UN peacekeepers against Somalis were heinous.
I
doubt the US, which with the backing of the United Nations
failed to help Somalia back on its feet, will ever bring Iraq
back from the chaos it dragged it into, for Iraq is more complex
than Somalia.
The
US' staunch support of dictators like Pervez Musharraf of
Pakistan and Islam Karimov of Uzbekistan, where people are
boiled alive to secure false admissions of guilt, as reported by
the UK's former ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray,
discredits the US' claim that it bears the banner of democracy.
It
is not only Arabia or the Muslim world, but the US that needs
reform as well!
Hassan
M. Aden
Arizona,
USA
Dec
31, 2005
We are responsible for our decisions. |
|
We
have a clear and direct guide for democracy in the Qur'an and
the authentic Hadiths of our master, Prophet Muhammad, and also
in the companions of the Prophet. We need to refer back to the
spirit of how they ruled the Believers. The first three
generations of believers are the safest and straightest way for
us.
We
don't need any rulings on how to eat, chew our food, or how
to live doing the mundane things in this life. Some things only
take some common sense. If I live in Alaska, I don't need anyone
telling me to put on an overcoat, get my drift?
Let's
not take our imams and scholars as lords, as did some of the
People of the Book. Listen to them with great respect and learn
from them, but remember that the Prophet said that in the last
days, there will be scholars who will mislead the nation. And so we
are responsible for our decisions.
There
is no greater guidance than the Qur'an and the example of our
Prophet and his companions.
Salahud-Din
Abdur-Rahim
Dec
30, 2005
If
the Arab world changes according to the West, disaster upon
disaster will occur in the Muslim world. The West is only full
of corruption. We must always remember that it’s not an ARAB
world; it’s the Muslim world, and obviously we should follow
the commands of the Qur'an and hadiths. We should prevent
indoctrination from the West in every way, because they are
trying to make us disbelieve Islam.
There
is no better way of living than that of a practicing Muslim.
We
should learn from what happened to Muslim Spain. Such a great
victory, yet it was lost to the West due to the pursuit of
personal desires and lusts.
As a young Muslim, I think we should return to the Shari`ah,
rather than turning to the West, which is like walking into
hell.
Nazrana
Oct 26, 2005
I
find Ramzy Baroud's comments on "the Arab peoples’
unequivocal demands for political rights, human rights, and
civil liberties," a bit strange. Correct me if I'm wrong,
but as far as I can tell, Arab run countries, i.e. Saudi Arabia,
Kuwait, Taliban-run Afghanistan and Saddam's Iraq were and still
are some of the most repressive places on the planet. Also,
quite a few non-Arab Muslim nations are just as bad.
Sunnis want to eradicate Shiites and visa versa. Let them at it and see where the chips fall. |
|
A
dictatorship could be considered a political right, I suppose.
but unless there is another definition of human rights and civil
liberties, I don't find those occurring in many Arab nations,
whether under the umbrella and strong arm of the US or not.
Religion is the big problem in running a nation, be it
Christianity, Judaism, Islam whatever. The leaders of these
religions, in fact the religions themselves totally negate and
are in direct opposition to "human rights and civil
liberties." The law of Shari`ah? The inquisition?
What god would ever demand that type of rule?
I
am against the Iraqi war. I really don't think that we, the US,
need to be concerned with democracy in parts of the world were
the populations are incapable of that type of government. In
Iraq and I think other parts of the Muslim world, there seems to
be a need to kill in the name of the Prophet. Sunnis want to
eradicate Shiites and visa versa. Well, I think it's horrible,
but here in the US, we have our problems. If that's their idea
of a pastime, let them at it and see where the chips fall. It
makes for interesting reading anyway.
John
Andrews
Oct
14, 2005
Any
fool can grasp and thereafter admit that the genuine purpose of
US regime activity is all about resource control on a shrinking
planet, and nothing about "freedom and democracy."
If "freedom and democracy" meant so much, why did they support Saddam as he gassed Kurds? |
|
If
"freedom and democracy" for the peoples of the Middle
East meant so much to the lying hacks for hire pretending to be
representatives of their people, why did they willfully support
Saddam Hussein as he gassed Kurds with the gas they themselves
supplied him with?
If
it meant so much, how come they continually use their
illegitimate "veto" rights to thwart every attempt to
rightfully castigate and sanction the political state of Israel
for its amply proven and substantiated crimes against humanity
with regard to the common and basic rights of Palestinian Arab
Semites?
Ad
infinitum, ad nauseum.
They
are liars and thieves disguised as servants of their people.
A
common cause of genuine freedom from foreign subjugation for all
the peoples of the Middle East is what is needed, is the one
missing thing that the foreign despot, (which is composed of
nothing more awesome or worthy of "terror" than
characterless Western businessmen) wants to ensure never
happens.
We
all remember Saladin after all! Not to mention Mohammed!
Robert
Scattergood
Oct
2, 2005
I
read Mr. Phillips article, and I think that he is mistaken in
thinking the USA are liberators in Iraq or the Middle East.
I agree that there's freedom in America, but to what extent?
Statistics show that every minute a women is being harassed,
raped, or abused. Child pornography is on the rise. Moral values
declining. How can the US liberate us when all this and worse is
happening in their country?
Basil
Uqba
Sep 30, 2005
I
find Ramzy Baroud's comments on "the Arab peoples’
unequivocal demands for political rights, human rights, and
civil liberties," a bit strange. Correct me if I'm wrong,
but as far as I can tell, Arab run countries, i.e. Saudi Arabia,
Kuwait, Taliban-run Afghanistan and Saddam's Iraq were and still
are some of the most repressive places on the planet. Also,
quite a few non-Arab Muslim nations are just as bad.
Sunnis
want to eradicate Shiites and visa versa. Let them at it and
see where the chips fall. |
|
A
dictatorship could be considered a political right, I suppose. but
unless there is another definition of human rights and civil
liberties, I don't find those occurring in many Arab nations,
whether under the umbrella and strong arm of the US or not. Religion
is the big problem in running a nation, be it Christianity, Judaism,
Islam whatever. The leaders of these religions, in fact the
religions themselves totally negate and are in direct opposition to
"human rights and civil liberties." The law of Shari`ah?
The inquisition? What god would ever demand that type of rule?
I
am against the Iraqi war. I really don't think that we, the US, need
to be concerned with democracy in parts of the world were the
populations are incapable of that type of government. In Iraq and I
think other parts of the Muslim world, there seems to be a need to
kill in the name of the Prophet. Sunnis want to eradicate Shiites
and visa versa. Well, I think it's horrible, but here in the US, we
have our problems. If that's their idea of a pastime, let them at it
and see where the chips fall. It makes for interesting reading
anyway.
John
Andrews
Oct 14, 2005
If
the Arab world changes according to the West, disaster upon disaster
will occur in the Muslim world. The West is only full of corruption.
We must always remember that it’s not an ARAB world; it’s the
Muslim world, and obviously we should follow the commands of the
Qur'an and hadiths. We should prevent indoctrination from the West
in every way, because they are trying to make us disbelieve Islam.
There
is no better way of living than that of a practicing Muslim.
We
should learn from what happened to Muslim Spain. Such a great
victory, yet it was lost to the West due to the pursuit of personal
desires and lusts.
As a young Muslim, I think we should return to the Shari`ah, rather
than turning to the West, which is like walking into hell.
Nazrana
Oct 26, 2005
Any
fool can grasp and thereafter admit that the genuine purpose of US
regime activity is all about resource control on a shrinking planet,
and nothing about "freedom and democracy."