Muhammad,
an average Egyptian citizen, has to work more than 12 hours a
day to earn a living for his family. He works for a private
company in the morning and in the afternoon he drives a taxi.
Still, he does not earn enough to ensure a bright future for his
children.
“I
am getting sick of this life,” he said. “Nothing seems to be
right. I have to work all day and face harassments from my boss
and the police in the street, and still go home unable to
fulfill my family’s needs.”
Muhammad’s
frustrations increase when he watches the news at the end of the
day and realizes how weak and incompetent his government has
become. “We have become an inferior society and it hurts me
that we have no pride left.”
He
talked of his Arab customers who come to Egypt on holidays.
“They talk to me about their hard lives and how difficult life
has become. They, too, are frustrated and have no trust in their
governments.”
Notwithstanding
the Egyptian government’s promises for reform, Muhammad has
stopped dreaming of a better life. “There is no hope. … The
change we will get is only to secure the regime’s position and
it will be as the US wants. No one asks me about what I want and
need,” he said in dismay, asserting that there was no talk on
reform before the US started to pressure Arab regimes.
The
Iraq War: A Political Awakening
Undoubtedly,
discussion on reform in the Arab World has been on the increase
ever since the two planes crashed into the two World Trade
Center towers in New York and even more since the outbreak of
the US-led war on Iraq.
“The
war on Iraq has led to the loss of credibility of Arab
regimes,” Dr. Mohammed Al-Sayed Said, deputy director of the
Cairo-based Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies,
said.
“It
has led to a political awakening in Arab streets and amongst
intellectuals, who have started to rediscover democracy as an
important factor for defending our nations,” he added.
“The
war on Iraq has led to the loss of credibility of Arab
regimes.”
|
|
A
clear example, according to Said, would be the Nasserites:
“Before, they were mainly concerned with the US and Israel.
Today, democracy is the most important priority on the
Nasserites’ political agenda.”
Emad
Attia from the Egyptian Popular Campaign for Change (Freedom
Now) agrees: “The war on Iraq has caused a form of pressure on
Arab regimes.” Yet, he insists that this is an additional
pressure that comes besides the already existing internal
pressures.
US
Initiatives
As
a reaction to the 9/11 terrorist attacks that threatened
American security, the US administration, headed by George W.
Bush, launched several initiatives to reform the Arab world.
Many believe that these have constituted a source of pressure on
Arab regimes that have in return adopted some changes in their
pattern of rule.
The
Saudi government introduced municipal council elections this
year, allowing Saudis to experience a little democracy for the
first time.
In
Egypt, President Hosni Mubarak surprised the world, on February
26, by announcing his intention to amend the constitution so as
to allow competitive presidential elections.
“With
no doubt ... US pressure has limited state oppression against
reform movements in the Arab world,” Dr. Said said.
On
the other hand, Dr. Amr Hamzawy, senior associate at the
Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,
believes it incorrect to reduce causes of change to American
pressure.
“Ever
since the 1990s there has been a change in the international
environment, which has become less preferable to non-democratic
systems and more preferable to values of human rights and good
governance; and thus governments have been evaluated according
to their respect for human rights and their extent of good
governance,” he said, adding that this is a main factor
contributing to the changes the region is witnessing today.
“What
we are seeing today in Arab streets ... is a reaction to
an accumulation of oppression and autocracy.”
|
|
Attia
of Freedom Now does not even see any pressures being exerted on
Arab regimes. “In my opinion, these are not pressures, but
political maneuvers, and, recently, this has become obvious as
we realize that the US is not really exerting pressure for real
reform but rather demanding some cosmetic changes.”
Founder
of Yemen’s Erhalou (Leave) movement Abdel Rahim Mohsen
believes that “what we are seeing today in Arab streets ... is
a reaction to an accumulation of oppression and autocracy.”
Hamzawy
explains why many attribute the tensions in the Arab world to US
foreign policy in the region: “The Arab world is currently
witnessing a moment of tension that leads to ambivalence and a
search for future models. Today, we are preoccupied with the
future form of the Arab world. [This preoccupation] came as a
result of the shock of the war on Iraq and the realization that
militants from our region are causing international terror.”
Demonstrations
in Arab Streets
Many
Arab countries are witnessing, for the first time,
demonstrations denouncing heads of states and demanding
comprehensive reform. Social movements such as Kefaya (Enough)
in Egypt, Erhalou in Yemen, and others appeared not long after
the war broke out.
“The
Arab people are reacting to the subordinate relation of their
regimes to the US, and the regimes’ impotence [and inability]
to defend themselves,” Dr. Said explained.
Attia
holds a similar point of view. “Social movements that demand
reform have become stronger because the people have started to
feel the flagrant failure of their governments.”
Dr.
Al-Said believes that political movements in the Arab world
started before the Iraq war. “The Palestinian Intifada created
a new situation; people started to go down to the streets and
demonstrate against the crimes committed in Palestine. This came
after a long period of political stagnation.”
“Sharon’s
unpunished crimes have led to frustration and a general sense of
weakness that have led to the collapse of the Arab regimes’
legitimacy. The war on Iraq came to contribute to the political
activity in Arab streets and the consequence was a political
awakening,” he added.
Attia
confirmed that there have always been demands for change even if
the political environment created an obstacle for them to be
announced publicly.