Your Mail

ÚÑÈí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

Book Review
A Portrait of Egypt
A Journey Through the World of Militant Islam

By Taqiyuddin Malik**
Freelance Journalist

June 27, 2005 

Author: Mary Anne Weaver

Pages: 306

Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

Coming a full two years before the apocalyptic events of September 11, Mary Anne Weaver’s A Portrait of Egypt is one of the few noteworthy books on militant Islam that cannot be accused of attempting to cash in on the media frenzy generated after that fateful day. Weaver, who covered the Middle East for the New Yorker, clarifies at the outset that the book “is not meant to be an academic or a definitive account,” but rather a chronicle of her own personal experiences in Egypt . Such an honest caveat is greatly appreciated in light of the insultingly sloppy works that are currently touted as being “academic” works by a plethora of alleged “terrorism experts.”

The book focuses on the history of confrontation between the forces of secularism and the waves of Islamic resurgence that have gripped Egypt since the 1920s. The emphasis, however, rests firmly on events beginning from the mid-1970s. The 1977 bread riots, the assassination of Sadat, the Afghan Jihad, the attempted assassination of Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz, the brutal crackdown on Islam and the siege of Imamba—all these events are covered at length in Portrait of Egypt.

Mary Anne Weaver lived in Egypt through some of the country’s most tumultuous times. She describes the erratic semi-civil war that raged in Egypt during the ‘90s between the government and the Islamist forces based primarily in Upper Egypt , from a uniquely personal perspective, having interviewed many of the protagonists on both sides. This provides a fascinating insight into the nature of the struggle that has been waged so brutally for so long; an insight often either lacking or pointedly avoided in a media obsessed with demonizing both political and militant Islam.

Weaver’s forays into the world of Islamic militancy are somewhat hampered by her inability to speak Arabic, and one sympathizes with the inevitable frustration she must have experienced in conducting interviews through interpreters.

While Weaver’s writing contains a palpably human streak, reflected in her detailed chronicling of Islamist grievances and government-perpetrated atrocities, she suffers from the prevalent ignorance of Islamic jurisprudence that afflicts so many Western writers and “experts” on militant Islam. This is reflected in a number of errors she inadvertently makes (she seems to believe that it is necessary to remove one’s shoes in the presence of a Sheikh, expressing surprise when she is not asked to). It also manifests, occasionally, in tacit condemnations. This is most apparent in the chapter titled “The Apostate,” dealing with the trial of Nasr Hamed Abu Zeid and the attempts to separate him from his wife on heresy charges, throughout which Abu Zeid was portrayed as the long-suffering academic, falsely accused by Abdel-Sabour Shahin, who in turn is made to sound a bit like a modern-day reincarnation of Tomas de Torquemada.

The book contains some fascinating interviews with a variety of characters, including but not limited to the formidable scholar Dr. Omar Abdel-Rahman, the spiritual guide of the Egyptian al-Jama’a al-Islammiya (currently jailed in the US under a Civil War-era law), President Hosni Mubarak, Dr. Mustafa Mashour, the deceased Supreme Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as various diplomats, politicians, and militants.

Weaver also delves into the Afghan quagmire, and provides the reader with a number of valuable observations. She refers to the concept of “blow back,” a term used to denote the fallout and negative implications of a policy failure. Weaver, of course, had no way of knowing that two years after the publication of her book, the ultimate form of blow back from US support to the Afghan Jihad would occur: the direct and devastating attack on the American homeland that was September 11.

A diplomat summed up the terrifying implications of the United States ' Afghan policy to Weaver:

"Even today, you can sit at the Khyber Pass and see every color, every creed, every nationality pass," a Western diplomat told me one afternoon on the veranda of his Peshawar home. "In their wildest imagination, these groups never would have met if there had been no jihad. For a Moro to get a Stinger missile! To make contacts with Islamists from North Africa ! The United States created a Moscow Central in Peshawar for these groups, and the consequences for all of us are astronomical."

Somehow, with the benefit of hindsight, the warning seems all the more foreboding and portentous.

No discussion of Afghanistan would be complete with reference being made to the primary movers and shakers of the Jihad, and Weaver handless this extensively, profiling the prolific Sheikh Abdullah Azzam, the enigmatic Abdurrab Sayyaf, and Gulbadin Hekmatyar.

But perhaps the most interesting aspect of the book is that detailing the bloody war between the Mubarak dictatorship and the Egyptian Islamic militias. The book is rife with interviews with the victims of Egyptian State Security forces, affording a disturbing look at the Mubarak regime’s methods in combating “terrorism,” methods of which the government boasted in the aftermath of September 11. Weaver cites the example of Amal, a 28-year-old woman whose brother was convicted for the attempted assassination of the Minister of Information (for which he is currently serving a 25-year prison sentence). Amal was apparently ordered to condemn her brother as a terrorist in front of the television cameras for the government’s benefit. Her refusal to do so was simply unacceptable, and so

"They tore off her veil and blindfolded her," Um Mohammed [her mother] said. "Then they stripped her down to her underwear and hung her from a hook in the ceiling by her hands. They taunted her; whipped her with cable wire; kicked her in the stomach; and, with razors, they sliced open her back. There were at least seven men in the room, Amal said, and some of them chanted, as they beat her, how much they would enjoy raping her…"

Weaver's personal anecdotes are certainly enlightening. She relates how, upon foolishly suggesting to President Mubarak that perhaps the best way of dealing with the militant Islamic groups was by legitimizing the moderates, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, and ending the crackdown which radicalizes mainstream Muslims, Weaver was subjected to a paranoid tirade:

"Absolutely not! I will not permit another Algeria here. Oh, yes, they say they have renounced violence, but in reality they are responsible for all this violence, and the time will come when they will be uncovered…"

But Mubarak's most disturbing—and chilling—comment was his response to a question about Abdel-Harith Madani’s autopsy report. Madani, a lawyer for a number of accused Islamists, was picked up from his office by State Security agents. His corpse was returned to his wife a few days later. He was buried, under guard (to avoid having his body examined), in an unmarked grave. Mubarak’s response to Weaver's query?

He leaned across the table toward me, and his face hardened perceptibly.

"Why is there such a fuss about Abdel-Harith Madani?" he asked, and his voice began to rise. "What about the human rights of the women and children that these people kill? Madani was a criminal!"

One takes issue, however, with Weaver’s paradigm of analysis. She whole-heartedly adopts the perspective popularized by Egyptian sociologist Saad Eddin Ibrahim, that Islamic militancy is the product of purely socio-economic factors. She buttresses this argument by citing various sources that support this extremely narrow interpretation of what has now been conclusively proven to be a global phenomenon. This perspective maintains that Islamic militants militancy is primarily fueled by unemployment, economic stagnations, sexual frustration, etc. One hopes that this theory has been sufficiently discredited by the attacks of September 11.

Notwithstanding the above, A Portrait of Egypt is a highly recommended read that captures the feel of Egypt during the years of violence that wracked the country. It is also useful as a record of the atrocities and machinations that spawned the current global war on terror, and as such is an indispensable tool for placing the conflict in its proper context.


** Taqiyuddin Malik is an Egyptian freelance writer based in Cairo .

The articles posted on this page reflect solely the opinions of the authors.

Views Archive

Advanced Search

Views & Analyses

 
Send Mail

Related Links:

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Muslim Affairs | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map