Eyes
have recently been turning at some of the US key allies in the
Middle East with intensified media coverage of their domestic
conditions and regional roles. Egypt, a staunch political ally of
the US, has been at the spotlight with increasing criticism of its
political system and human rights record. Yet with a sweeping
announcement given by the Egyptian president, chances for reform
have suddenly become a promising reality for many Egyptians.
IslamOnline’s Sally Sami takes us into Cairo for a close Egyptian
perspective on the president’s controversial announcement.
Egyptian
President Hosni Mubarak surprised the world when he made a televised
announcement on February 26, 2005 that he had asked the parliament
and the Egyptian Shura council to consider amending the constitution
in order to open the door for contested presidential elections this
year.
“Out
of my keenness to continue on the road to freedom... I submitted a
request this morning to the People’s Assembly and the Shura
Council to amend Article 76 of the Egyptian constitution regarding
the system of electing the president of the republic, so that the
two councils can start discussing it and suggest a proper amendment
in a way that conforms with the conditions of the current stage”
Mubarak said, before an audience at the University of Menoufiya in
the Egyptian delta.
“The
president will be elected through direct, secret balloting, opening
the opportunity for political parties to run in the presidential
elections and providing guarantees that allow more than one
candidate for the people to choose from with their own will.”
This
announcement was made soon after Condoleezza Rice had postponed a
previously scheduled visit to Egypt. It is believed that this
decision came as a result of the arrest of Ayman Nour, a leading
opposition and head of the newly established Ghadd party.
Nour,
who is still detained, described this move as “an important and
courageous move” toward “comprehensive constitutional reform,”
in a statement that was read by his wife Gamila Ismail.
US
State Department Spokesman, Steven Pike, welcomed the initiative.
“As
a friend of the Egyptian government and people, we’ve urged Egypt
to broaden the base of political participation,” Mr Pike said.
“This appears to be a step in the direction of a more open
political system.”
“[T]he government is choosing who is eligible to run against the president.” |
|
Opposition
has long called for open and free presidential elections; however,
their request was repeatedly rejected by the ruling party.
Accordingly, many believe that this is another manoeuvre by the
government to avoid real reform.
“The
way it’s going in the Parliament, we will find that the case will
be as if the president is choosing who will be his opposing
candidates,” Essam Al-Aryan, a leading member in the Muslim
Brotherhood said.
People’s
assembly Speaker, Fathy Sorour said that the constitutional changes
would enable any person to nominate himself but under certain
conditions. However, he was quoted by the official Middle East News
Agency as saying parties could make nominations. Meanwhile,
independent candidates will have to get the backing of a yet
undefined number of members of parliament and local councils.
“Basically,
nominees are limited only to the heads of opposition parties and
opposition parties are registered by the government. In other words,
the government is choosing who is eligible to run against the
president,” Al-Aryan stated.
On
the other hand, Dr. Usama Al-Ghazali Harb, Member of the Shura
Council and Editor in Chief of the International Politics Journal,
said that he believes that this is a historical transformation
moment that will witness a difference. “What is happening now is
only an indicator to this major historical transformation.”
Many
political analysts believe that this step was going to be taken
sooner or later.
“[T]his case is different. There is a chance for the people to have a say.” |
|
Ahmed
Sayed Ahmed, a political analyst in Al-Ahram Newspaper, says
that there were several factors that pushed Mubarak to hasten the
constitutional reform process. “There are pressures within the
country represented in the call made by opposition groups for
comprehensive political change. At the same time, foreign pressures
for a more democratic Egypt are increasing.”
On
the other hand, Muhammad Shamroukh, a journalist in Al-Ahram,
sees that the decision came mainly as a result of popular pressure
for change. “Talk on Gamal Mubarak succeeding his father as what
happened in Syria led the people to go out and call for a change in
the constitution to ensure rotation of leadership.”
Under
the current system, the parliament, which is dominated by the ruling
National Democratic Party, has to approve a sole candidate who then
runs for referendum by the Egyptian people.
The
next presidential vote is due in September and many young people are
looking forward to it.
Saffaa
Hussein, a student in the faculty of political science, Cairo
University, said that she wishes she had a voting card. “This is a
historical moment that I would like to participate in.” Saffaa did
not see any use in voting before. “The results were known
beforehand but this case is different. There is a chance for the
people to have a say.”
However,
Al-Aryan strongly believes that reform cannot take place when the
state of emergency exists. “Reform should include the right of the
candidates to equal sources for campaigning. This cannot happen as
long as the Emergency Law is still in effect.”
Yet,
Dr. Harb sees that this step will open the door to comprehensive
reform.
“The
President’s decision to allow competitive presidential elections
opens the door for comprehensive reform of the constitution and the
regime and allows us—for the first time since more than half a
century—to work together to build a democratic republic.”