In
his house, in Hammersmith, a multiethnic neighborhood in west
London, Sebaai stressed that religion was behind Bush’s campaign,
and referred to right-wing Christians who assumed leading positions
in his administration.
“Is
it a coincidence that [US Attorney General] Ashcroft is distributing
bibles and prayer manuals in the Justice Department?” he said.
“George Bush himself stated it’s a ‘Crusade.’ That was not a
slip. The man is not stupid as people think. He means what he says,
and he is driven by his faith.”
The
Bush administration is “mobilizing the American soldiers using
religion, and in return they want to deny the other the right to use
religious mobilization,” Sebaai added in dismay.
Observers
in Cairo have highlighted the outbreak of the second Palestinian
Intifada, September 11 attacks, and the US-led onslaught on
Afghanistan and Iraq as triggers to the ongoing radicalization
across the Muslim World, a radicalization that is feeding Islamist
militancy, especially as Muslims could clearly see that it is
largely the Islamists who are now on the forefront of the struggle
to end Western hegemony in the region.
It has never been that easy for rage to meet ideology. |
|
“September
11 was Islamism’s Suez War,” said Diaa Rashwan, an analyst with
Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies. “Nasser’s
defiance to the West in 1956 was the virtual birthmark of
pan-Arabism. September 11 attacks and the war on terror served the
same purpose for pan-Islamism. They united Muslims around the world
by the sense that ‘we are all under attack by the West, and we
have to do something.’ ”
This
is pushing, Rashwan argues, new actors to enter the stage of armed
politics: the “freelance jihadis.” And it has never been that
easy before for rage to meet ideology, as Abdullah Schleifer, a
Cairo-based media analyst, likes to put it.
“The
discourse associated with al-Qaeda is very contemporary. It is
accessible, demotic and needs no great erudition or literacy to
understand,” noted The Observer’s Chief Reporter Jason Burke in
his recent book on al-Qaeda. “It evokes events and personalities,
many dating back to the seventh century, in the knowledge that they
will be understood by the target audience, a large portion of whom
are illiterate. The symbolism is powerful but easy to grasp. It
offers instant gratification, instant empowerment. Any group or
individual can find elements that are useful within it… Its
symbols have even spread outside the Islamist context. Thai Hells
Angels now sport portraits of bin Laden on their bikes and helmets.
Bin Laden has become a counter-cultural symbol, representative of a
discourse of dissent.
“Before
satellite TV, phones and the Internet, bin Laden might have been
nothing more than a Messianic mahdi for a thousand tribesmen.
But modern communications technology has allowed exiled radicals to
broadcast their views to target populations free from state
interference or retribution.”
On
the early morning of last Christmas, about two dozens of men and
women gathered outside a military camp on the outskirts of Medinet
Nasr, an eastern suburb of Cairo. After two hours of waiting, a blue
prison truck packed with Muslim detainees hurled its way into the
camp, followed by armed Special Operations soldiers in a van. The
families ran after the truck till it reached the gate, hysterically
waiving their hands and shouting their relatives’ names.
The
43 detainees are awaiting a trial in a martial court after they were
picked up in Alexandria, Beheira, and Mahalla 15 months ago. The
government charged the suspects with forming an underground group,
dubbed as “Jundullah” (Soldiers of Allah), and planning attacks
on “Western targets” in Egypt.
The
police announced they discovered two homemade bomb factories. The
suspects were planning, according to the security, to use pigeons
laden with explosives, to be flown directly to their targets. The
suspects are also accused of planning to hijack a bus, load it with
explosives, and then storm the US embassy on a Friday, by the time
of the call for the Friday prayers, so as to avoid inflicting
causalities on Egyptian civilians and limit the carnage to the empty
building and its American guards.
The
authorities carefully stated the group did not have a direct
“organizational” link with al-Qaeda, but Osama bin Laden’s
video statements, as well as literature by his right-hand man Ayman
al-Zawahri, were found in some of the suspects’ homes -
constituting the group’s “action program.”
According
to defense lawyers and Islamist sources in London and Cairo, the
detainees, most of whom are in their mid 20s and 30s, do not have
political records.
“…a group of people who sat down, gave it a thought, and wanted to travel to carry out jihad...” |
|
“Everyone
is talking about the Intifada,” said defense lawyer Youssef
Saqr, in his house, few kilometers away from the military court. The
suspects “are simply a group of people who sat down, gave it a
thought, and wanted to travel to carry out jihad in Palestine. When
they couldn’t, they decided to attack the American and Israeli
embassies in Cairo.”
The
state-owned Al-Ahram had reported, on January 5, 2003, that
the defendants had allegedly vowed revenge for the Israeli
atrocities in Jenin in April 2002.
The
67-year-old Islamist lawyer proudly stated that he would include, in
his defense, studies on the “Crusader-Zionist conspiracy plans”
against Muslims, hoping “the military judges would realize the
threat all Muslims are under today.”
The
arrest of Jundullah’s suspects was followed by a series of
security crackdowns on other new amateur groups. Last September, the
Egyptian minister of interior announced the arrest of 25 alleged
militants, including six foreign Al-Azhar students: three Bengalis,
a Turk, a Malaysian, and a Tunisian. They were charged with
establishing an underground group, dubbed as the “Jihad group for
supporting Muslims inside and abroad.” The minister told the
weekly Al Mussawar last September that the group “followed
al-Qaeda’s line, but is not affiliated organizationally.” He
added that the suspects were not planning attacks in Egypt, but they
wanted to join the jihad in Iraq and Palestine against Coalition and
Israeli forces respectively. “The group’s members confessed they
endorsed jihadi thought [regarding it as a way] to protect Muslim
minorities under oppression in some Asian countries, and because
they were enraged by US and Israeli practices in the Arab region,”
the minister added.
“More
of these [amateur] groups will appear, due to the rage against the
US policies in the Middle East,” commented Islamist lawyer Montasser Al-Zayat, in his office in downtown Cairo. The expected
damage could vary in scale from a couple of rocks thrown at a
McDonald’s branch to “disastrous operations,” he warned.