Intelligent Design vs. Darwinism: A Constant Conflict
By IOL Health and Science Staff
Dec
21, 2005
Once
again a whirlwind of controversy circling the Darwinism and Intelligent Design
(ID) debate has been sparked by a clash in the courtrooms. This time around,
eleven parents opposed to the idea of ID being taught in school, sued the
Dover
Area School Board on the basis that ID was not a science and should not be
included in the curriculum.
Intelligent
design has been said by evolutionists to be an extension of creationism, thus
allowing a ‘back door’ for religion to enter into schools if included in the
curriculum. This, it has been argued, goes against the constitution of the
United States of America because it violates the separation of Church and State.
Yet,
most ID advocates do not specify belief in a certain religion or religion per
se. Many ID activists purport the belief in any form of supernatural force or
deity and not necessarily God. However, the words creationism and intelligent
design have been used interchangeably and various media outlets have called the
ruling “a blow to Christian conservatives.”
Several
question marks arise in this discussion, such as, is intelligent design really
another form of creationism? Should evolution continue to be taught in ‘modern
world’ schools unchallenged? Do students have the right to decide for
themselves what to believe ?
Read
more about the case and intelligent design below: