Your Mail

ÚÑÈí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 


Government-Imposed Non-Governmental Water Associations

A Solution or Just More Trouble?*

By Nadia El-Awady **

Sep. 25, 2005

Egypt’s Minia Governorate lies 250km south of Cairo

“Mommy, he made me do it!” “No Mommy, I only told him to do it. Now it’s broken and it’s all his fault!”

For some odd reason, that recurrent scene that happens between my children when something goes wrong in the house came jumping to mind while I was attending a workshop for farmers and irrigation engineers in Upper Egypt’s Minia University, some 250 km south of Cairo.

The workshop was part of a research project led by Dr. Mohammed A. Kishk, Director of Minia University’s Service Laboratory for Soil, Water & Plant Analysis. The International Development Research Center (IDRC) backed project has been studying the effectiveness of Water Users Associations (WUAs) in Minia in managing the governorate’s irrigation issues.

Of course, if I were the one in charge, my immediate reaction would have been, “All of you go to your rooms, and don’t you dare let me hear a peep out of you!”

Luckily enough for the bickering farmers and irrigation engineers, I’m not their mother. Dr. Kishk’s coolheaded approach was quite different. “We’re not here to put the blame on each other,” he emphasized. “We want to find a way to make the situation better.”

An Organizational Revolution?

Water Users Associations were first implemented in Egypt in 1988 as part of the Egyptian Ministry of Irrigation and Water Resources’ Irrigation Improvement Project (IIP). The project was comprised of a physical component and an organizational component.

The physical component consisted of improving the irrigation process at the level of the main and branch canals, all the way down to the mesqa; the final irrigation canal that directly feeds the farmers’ lands. Mesqas served by the project were elevated above the level of the land itself, and a single diesel pump appointed at the head of each mesqa to lift water to it from the lower branch irrigation canal. This ensured a continuous flow of water throughout the whole mesqa for as long as the pump was working. The mesqas then underwent a process of renovation, where they were either lined with concrete slabs or replaced with Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) piping that was buried underground, providing more land space for the farmers to plant on.

The organizational component of the IIP was aimed at encouraging the formation of Water Users Associations; non-governmental associations of farmers at each mesqa to organize the irrigation process, to maintain the mesqas and the diesel pump, and to settle conflicts that might arise between farmers about water management.

The bickering farmers and irrigation engineers make it obvious that this aim has not yet been fully realized, to say the least.

Muhammad Tusson only discovered he was the WUA treasurer of his mesqa in the village of Mantoot in Minia Governorate when the Egyptian government decided to ask the farmers to pay for the diesel pump it gave them several years back as part of the IIP in their village. The farmers had assumed the pump was a grant from the government. Tusson was asked to pay up from the irrigation fees he was supposedly collecting from his WUA general assembly members.

“I hadn’t collected anything from anyone,” he proclaimed during the one-day workshop in Minia University. According to WUA by-laws, it is the treasurer’s job to collect the fees for operating the diesel pump from farmers wanting to irrigate their lands. A receipt is signed and then taken to the pump operator. In reality, however, it is the diesel pump operator who collects these fees in most villages.

This is where most of the problems with WUAs have arisen. “The whole idea behind establishing WUAs in Egypt was getting the farmers to participate in the management of their own resources,” explained Kishk. “But that isn’t what happened,” he added.

Instead of farmers electing board members for their WUA, what happened in many cases was that the local irrigation engineer – a government employee – appointed the board members himself, who signed the necessary papers not fully comprehending the concept of WUAs in the first place. The pump operator, who should be an elected WUA board member, was also appointed by the local irrigation engineer, and provided with a diesel pump which he was told he would be held fully accountable for.

This is exactly why Tusson found himself in a big barrel of trouble. Tusson had signed the papers saying he was the treasurer of his WUA, but was not informed of his duties, nor was he provided with a receipt-book. Tusson and other members of the WUA board also did not receive training on accounting or on holding meetings and keeping minutes. The whole concept of WUA was foreign to them, and their only comprehension of what a WUA was, was that of the diesel pump operator’s duty to manage the irrigation schedule for the farmers and collect the fees.

“The system was forced on the farmers. The Ministry [of Irrigation] doesn’t want to give up its role in the lives of the people,” said Kishk.

Khalaf Shafeeq, the local water advisor appointed by the Ministry of Irrigation and Water Resources (MIWR) to advise WUAs in Tusson’s village, however, places the blame on Tusson and his fellow-farmers. “What gets me really angry is that Tusson and the other members of his WUA board are educated men,” he said. “How could they have signed the papers appointing them as WUA board members, without understanding what they were signing?” asked Shafeeq in frustration.

Collecting Information

Pumps lift irrigation waters from the lower canal into the mesqa

One of the first research studies to evaluate WUAs in Egypt was another IDRC funded project that presented its final report in May 2001. The project aimed at forming a large database of information on WUAs in the country.

“There is a need to revisit WUAs in most regions by appropriate authorities aiming at enhancing the involvement of individual members of WUAs in the affairs of their respective associations,” recommended the report conducted by the American University in Cairo’s Desert Development Center (DDC).

However, “WUAs are a solution to Egypt’s irrigation problems,” commented an optimistic Dr. Mohamed Al-Sabbah, project team leader and then director of the DDC. Al-Sabbah believes that WUAs have the ability to increase water use efficiency in the country.

The DDC study, which covered seven regions all over Egypt, claimed that increased yields of maize, cotton, rice, and wheat of 25 percent, 21 percent, 10 percent, and 9 percent respectively resulted from the establishment of WUAs in these regions. The study also discovered that crop yields didn’t vary significantly between the head of the mesqa and the tail end, which the researchers believe is due to an increase in water equity along the mesqa. The result was an increase in the farmers’ net income from major crops, the study revealed.

It was this component of the DDC study, however, that provoked Minia University’s Mohammed Kishk to conduct further studies on WUAs in Egypt.

Kishk believes that the DDC study’s insistence on considering “WUAs [as] synonymous with IIP” resulted in their failure to assess whether better water efficiency was resulting from the physical or the organizational components of the project.

“There is no evidence that there is better water efficiency as a result of WUAs in Egypt,” said Kishk.

Participatory Approach

In order to assess the farmers’ understanding of the different components of the IIP, researchers in the Minia project used a Participatory Development Communication tool known as photo-novella. Twenty men and women in some of Minia’s villages were given a camera and asked to take photographs of things that depict their understanding of the components of the IIP. “They mostly saw the IIP as a project for lining canals,” said Kishk. “The organizational component of the project didn’t appear in any of the photographs,” he said.

The participatory approach has been an important component all along in the Minia study. “These meetings are for exchanging opinions,” Kishk declared in the beginning of one of several workshops held for farmers and irrigation engineers. “We want to tell you about some ideas, and see what you think about them,” he said.

Kishk explained that the group meetings were very successful. “They resulted in good communication between the researchers, the farmers, and the irrigation engineers,” he said. A wide range of issues related to the IIP and WUAs evolved from those conversations, and attempts to find solutions to problems raised were also made, Kishk explained.

Will Women Ever Be a Second W in WUAs?


“Once I tried to comment on a problem, but a man with influence and authority told me to ‘just wait until we talk about collecting garbage and we will allow you to talk,’” said a woman in rural Egypt.


Significant numbers of women interviewed in both the DDC and Minia studies expressed negative feelings towards becoming members of WUAs on their mesqas.

The DDC report explained that customary gender roles in the village “still conceive irrigation management as work of men, both in terms of the work of cleaning canals, and in distributing water.” The Minia study elaborated by saying that the women they surveyed saw themselves better equipped to handle such issues as water pollution, birth control and family planning, representing other women, and cleaning the environment.

Women interviewed in the DDC study complained that when they had occasion to attend a WUA meeting, the men would not allow them to speak. One woman interviewed went so far as to say that “once I tried to comment on a problem, but a man with influence and authority told me to ‘just wait until we talk about collecting garbage and we will allow you to talk,’” she said.

Women are actually seen by some of the men in their villages to be part of the problem when it comes to maintaining the irrigation canals and mesqas. Women frequently resort to washing clothes, dirty dishes, and animals in the irrigation canals, in addition to throwing solid waste along their sides, said the DDC report.

Important Questions

The principal investigator of the Minia project, Dr. Mohammed Abdel Aal from Cairo University’s Faculty of Agriculture, has a critical view of the current status of WUAs in the country based on his research. “People will continue to irrigate whether there are WUAs or not; conflicts or not. Irrigation and cultivation will continue; it’s a basic fact of life. But we are intervening for more efficiency. The important question to ask here is have we accomplished that or not?” asked Abdel Aal.

“It’s a mistake to compel organizations at the grassroots level to implement developmental approaches that are not yet implemented at other levels,” hinted Abdel Aal. “Don’t talk about democracy of management and it’s not happening elsewhere; governance of irrigation and its not happening elsewhere. This is called uneven development,” said Abdel Aal.

IDRC project organizer for the Minia study, Dr. Lamia El-Fattal, has similar misgivings. “Project results seem to indicate that WUAs in Minia have succeeded in reducing conflict among water users along the same water supply system by providing sufficient amounts of water to farmers along a canal at the right time,” she said. “However, the study also shows that despite the fact that these WUAs have been in existence for the past 15 years, farmers still do not demonstrate ownership of these associations. Consequently, whether they are viable, sustainable institutional entities in their current form is certainly debatable,” she concluded.

Minia’s Dr. Mohamed Kishk, however, refuses to give up on the positive outcomes that could arise from properly implementing the WUA concept. Drinking the dark tea that citizens of Upper Egypt cannot do without, and smoking cigarettes after lunching together in Minia Sporting Club, Kishk talks with the farmers and irrigation engineers at the conclusion of that overwhelming one-day workshop.

“Let’s do what the by-laws say we should do and see what happens,” he told the group. “Let’s start up a WUA from the very beginning, do the necessary training, call for a meeting of the general assembly, buy our own WUA pump, and see how it works out,” he said.

The optimistic farmers stand up, give Dr. Kishk a hearty handshake, and return to their villages with hope filling their hearts that tomorrow will be a better day. And Muhammed Tusson of Mantoot village leaves, his face covered from ear to ear with a huge, satisfied smile.


* This is an edited version of an as yet unpublished article commissioned by the International Development Research Center (IDRC) as a case study of its People, Land and Water projects in the Middle East. It has been published with the IDRC’s permission.

** Nadia El-Awady is IslamOnline.net's managing science editor. Nadia won first prize of the 2004 WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene for All) Media Award for her article The Nile and its People: What Goes Around Comes Around. She is also the chair of the World Federation of Science Journalists’ program committee and the president of the Arab Association of Science Journalists. She has a bachelor's degree in medicine from Cairo University and is currently studying for a masters degree in journalism and mass communications at the American University in Cairo.  You can reach her at: ScienceTech@islam-online.net.

Health & Science

Please feel free to contact the Health & Science editor at:
ScienceTech@islam-online.net


Science News | Health and Alternative Medicine  
Faith and Science/Medicine | Institutions and Scientists
Environment |
Computers and Communications | Genetics| Technology
Natural Sciences | Muslim Heritage

back

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Muslim Affairs | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map

Send Mail

Read Also: