|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Long Wait Is Over
The Kyoto Protocol Enters Into Force
|
|
By
Joyce Loanzon Reyes* |
February
17, 2005 |
|

|
|
Greenpeace
activists demonstrate in Ottawa, Canada as they call on the federal
government to do more in reaching its commitments of the Kyoto Accord.
REUTERS/Jim Young
|
On
February
16, 2005 , 128 countries all over the world became formally
bounded by the Kyoto Protocol. After seven years of study, negotiations and
preparations, the global environmental system has finally adopted an
international agreement that aims to reduce global greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions and improve the ecological system by the year 2010.
In a United Nations press release regarding the
scheduled entry into force, UN Secretary-General Kofi Anan underscored the
Protocol’s implementation. “This is a historic step forward in the world's
efforts to combat a truly global threat. Most important, it ends a long
period of uncertainty. Those countries that have ratified the Protocol,
and which have been trying to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases even before
its entry into force, now have a legally binding obligation to do so,” he
said.
The Road to
Kyoto
It was through the findings of the scientists tasked
to look at the global warming conditions that sound scientific knowledge
regarding climate change emerged, which in turn instigated response from the
international community. As the timeline below illustrates, worldwide efforts
have been pushing for many years for international cooperation in addressing the
problem of global warming.
1988
-
The International
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was created, which brought together experts from
all over the world to study global warming and its effects on the world.
Established by the UN Environmental Program (UNEP) and the World Meteorological
Organization (WMO), the IPCC asked policymakers to assess the possible economic
and sociological impacts of climate change.
-
The Toronto Conference
on the Changing Atmosphere was held, where former prime ministers Brian Mulroney
of Canada
and Gro Garlem Bruntland of
Norway led world representatives to agree on a 20 percent cut based on their 1988 GHG
emissions by 2005. The conference described climate change as “second only to
global nuclear war.”
1990
1992
-
The
Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil was held, which created the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC). Aimed at stabilizing 1990 greenhouse gas emission levels by
2000. Countries also agreed to meet each year to review the Convention
through the Conference of Parties (COP) meeting.
1995
-
The
first COP was held in Berlin,
Germany where a review of the Rio Convention’s adequacy was done.
-
The
IPCC published its second report stating that “the balance of evidence”
pointed to a “discernable human influence on the global climate system.”
1996
-
The
IPCC statements grew more intense, stating that “climate change
represented a danger to humanity” and that “discernable human influence
on global climate…projected change in climate [that] will result in
significant, often adverse, impacts on many ecological systems and
socio-economic sectors, including food supply and water resources and on
human health.”
-
The
second COP was held in Geneva,
Switzerland.
1997
-
The
COP was held in
Kyoto,
Japan
where countries raised new goals for the Rio Convention. Finding the Rio
provisions impractical, they placed the reduction targets at 5 percent of
1990 GHG levels by 2008 – 2012.
-
Some
countries had specific targets such as the United
States(7 percent),
Canada
(6 percent) and the European Union (8 percent). Among EU members,
Germany
committed to a 25 percent specific target while the United
Kingdom’s was at 15
percent.
1998
-
The
COP IV was held in
Buenos Aires
,
Argentina .
It produced the Buenos Aires Plan of Action, with the international
community agreeing on setting the guidelines and rules needed for the
implementation of the Kyoto Protocol.
Kyoto
mechanisms such as emissions trading, carbon sinks, joint implementation and
the clean development mechanism were established. The countries agreed that
these mechanisms would be finalized at the next COP meeting to be held in
Canada or at the latest, by the year 2000.
2000
2001
-
COP
VI was held in
Bonn
,
Germany where countries (except the
United
States ) finally agreed on
the Kyoto Protocol through the Bonn Protocol. At this point, countries must
officially ratify the Protocol.
-
The
Marrakesh Accords designed a system to fulfill the Protocol’s provisions
through establishing rules and regulations for its implementation.
|

|
|
Smoke pours
from a paper factory
in Durango, northern Spain. REUTERS/Vincent West
|
The
Protocol
Through the Kyoto Protocol, legally binding
obligations for developed countries to lower their GHG emissions were set out.
They were given six GHGs to reduce, namely: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous
oxide, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulfur
hexafluoride. Under the provisions of the Kyoto Protocol, industrialized
countries are required to reduce their combined emissions of the six major GHGs
enumerated to below 1990 levels during the period from 2008 to 2012.
It provided three flexibility mechanisms to achieve
its emissions targets, providing countries with cost-effective means. The Joint
Implementation and Emissions Trading mechanisms involved agreements between two
Annex I (developed or industrialized) countries. The Emissions Trading involves
the buying and selling of emissions credits among developed/industrialized
countries. The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) provided joint projects between
developed countries who will establish environmental projects in developing
countries in return for CERs. CERs are certified emission reduction credits that
are earned depending on the kind of project and its reached targets. An
international CDM Executive Board (EB) has been set up to facilitate project
approvals, approve project methodologies (operational means of CDM projects) and
soon after, the issuance of CERs. The CDM Executive Board will maintain a
registry for the issuance and distribution of CDM credits.
In the CDM, approved methodologies (by the Executive
Board) have been set up to guide project developers who wish to participate. At
the moment, project registry is continuous and is being acted upon. Project
developers must submit a project design document (PDD) to the Executive Board.
Through the Marrakesh Accords, a designated national authority (DNA) is required
of any country who would like to participate in CDM. The DNA acts as the
national representative of every country to the EB. An endorsement from the DNA
is required for project approval at EB level as well as the issuance of the
CERs. A highlight of CDM project
approval considerations is the agreement of a project’s objectives to a
country’s sustainable development goal.
Russia
Signs In, US Still Out
In
many developing countries, efforts to address climate change have also been
successful. In countries like the Philippines ,
national authorities have been set up as the one-stop-shop and international
entity for the country’s communication to the executive board of the CDM, one
of the mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol. For Climate Change Secretariat
Executive Secretary Joke Waller-Hunter, “A period of uncertainty has closed.
Climate change is ready to take its place again at the top of the global
agenda.”
|

|
|
A view of
traffic on a freeway out of the Sydney central business district.
REUTERS/David Gray
|
Last
November 2004, the Russian
Federation signed the instrument of
ratification of the Protocol. Russia ’s
ratification leaves only four industrialized countries out of the Protocol,
namely Australia , Liechtenstein , Monaco and the
United States .
According to UNEP, these countries account for over one third of GHG emissions
from industrialized countries while the United
States alone accounts for 36.2% of
global emissions. Further, it enumerated developing countries like Brazil
, China , India and Indonesia as developing countries who are parties to the Protocol with no specific
emission targets.
To
underscore Russia ’s
ratification to the Protocol, 55 industrialized countries were needed for it to
be entered into force. The 55 ratifications were required to represent 55
percent of the world’s emissions and participation in reducing it. The rules
did not limit ratifications to developed countries, making the Protocol a
possibility without US cooperation. President Putin’s agreement to the Protocol will in turn gain
Russia the European Union’s support for its bid to join the World Trade Organization.
Top leaders from the world praised Russia ’s
move with Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi calling it “a fresh start
for policies to combat global warming.” United
Kingdom Prime Minister Tony Blair stated, “I welcome the leadership of
President Putin and his government on this critical global issue.” And to
demonstrate the EU’s support, Blair added that he is looking forward to
meeting with Putin at the Group of Eight meeting next year (2006) where he said
that “climate change will be a major theme.” Japanese Environment Minister
Yuriko Koike said that Russia ’s
move will “continuously urge the US , Australia and other countries which have not ratified the protocol” to do so.
The
call for the US to ratify the Protocol is still unheeded. President Bush offered an alternative
way of addressing global warming. In his plan, his government will offer
incentives to businesses that will voluntarily reduce US GHG emissions by 4.5
percent in ten years. Asian and European countries have criticized the US
for not agreeing to the Protocol. According to President Bush, the Protocol has
unrealistic goals that could damage the American economy.
Now That the Wait Is Over
|

|
|
Japanese
citizens march in a parade from Kyoto City Hall in Kyoto. REUTERS/Kimimasa
Mayama
|
UN
Secretary-General Kofi Anan illustrated the upcoming benefits of the
Protocol’s entry into force in his press release upon Russia ’s
submission of its ratification. “Businesses that have been exploring the realm
of green technology now have a strong signal about the market viability of their
products and services. And the financial community and insurance industry, which
have been trying to “put a price” on the risks associated with climate
change, now have a stronger basis for their decision-making on incentives and
corporate performance.”
According
to the United Nations, the IPCC recently reported that humanity’s emissions of
carbon dioxide and other GHGs will raise global temperatures by 1.4 -5.8 °C by
the end of the century. Further, it is predicted that this will affect weather
patterns, ecosystems and climate events. Even now, global warming is being felt
through the shrinking of the sea-ice glaciers in both the Arctic
and the Antarctic areas, in addition to change of weather patterns and seasons
globally.
For
now, the international movement that spearheaded the movement for the Kyoto
Protocol and other environmental means are looking forward to reaping the
benefits of these agreements. After its entry into force, what is left now is
action and cooperation among those who pledged their commitment. This call is
echoed by UN Secretary-General Kofi Anan when he called for cooperation, “All
countries must now do their utmost to combat climate change and to keep it from
undermining our efforts to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. I therefore
take this opportunity to urge those developed countries who have not ratified
the Protocol to ratify it and limit their emissions.”
* Joyce
Loanzon Reyes is currently a
technical assistant for the United Nations Development Programme Clean
Development Mechanism Philippine Project Management Office. She is a
graduate of International Studies from Miriam College, Philippines. She participated in the Model United
Nations of the Far West in San Francisco, Californina for her internship.
She worked for the USAID and the Presidential Task Force on the
Reconstruction of Iraq . You may reach her at joycelreyes@yahoo.com
|
|
|
|
|
|