|

|
|
Glaciers in the Baspa Valley are beginning to vanish |
Indian
space scientists have, for the first time, warned that glaciers in the
Himalayas
– the highest mountain chain in the world - are melting due to global
warming. Four glaciers in the Baspa river basin in Himachal Pradesh, a state in
northwestern
India
, are beginning to vanish. As a front-page banner story in the Hindustan
Times daily in
Delhi
reported, they are facing “terminal retreat”.
As
many as 15 more glaciers in the same basin are in danger of losing their bulk.
Alarmingly, they are shedding more ice in summer than gaining snow in winter.
Scientists term this “negative mass balance”.
The
inner core of these glaciers has begun to melt in the last few years. This was
previously confined to the snow that fell in winter, leaving the core intact.
The
Delhi
newspaper quoted Dr. Anil V. Kulkarni, Principal Investigator of Glaciology
projects at the Space Applications Centre in Ahmedabad, as saying, “If
climatic conditions remain the same as in 2000, then our models show that the
four glaciers will disappear completely by 2040. But since we know that
temperatures are rising, this process will be much faster.”
The
scientists have used satellite pictures to track the changes in the mountain
chain. The
Himalayas
are literally
India
’s biggest lifeline, since the melt from glaciers is the source of most of the
mighty rivers that flow in the northern and central belts. They also play a
major role in blocking the moisture-laden winds that then fall as monsoon rains.
Devastating
Impacts
|

|
|
Reductions in the flow of the Baspa will affect the functioning of the hydroelectric projects downstream in Himachal Pradesh |
Until
now, nature has enabled
India
to depend on glacial melt as a perennially renewable source of water, which is
the most precious resource in this dry country with the second largest
population in the world. If the glaciers disappear, the consequences will be
simply catastrophic.
Among
other things, the specific situation in the Baspa basin will reduce the flow of
the river, a tributary of the
Sutlej
, and this will affect the functioning of the hydroelectric projects downstream
in Himachal Pradesh.
India
is acutely short of power, and hilly states such as Himachal can generate an
enormous amount of electricity for the rest of the country.
According
to the Hindustan Times, the glacial
meltdown will also impact the ambitious plan to link the northern rivers, which
supposedly have a surplus flow during the monsoons, with the perpetually
deficient southern rivers. The scheme, which has the blessings of both President
Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam and Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, will cost a
staggering $124 billion over a couple of decades – a quarter of the
country’s GDP. Environmentalists have criticized the scheme on several counts
and this fresh evidence casts new doubts regarding it.
Considering
the huge populations of northern Indian states like Uttar Pradesh and
Bihar
– several of which would qualify as countries in their own right in terms of
numbers – the implications of a reduced flow in the key rivers are most
alarming. The Indo-Gangetic belt, which encompasses these states, happens to be
the breadbasket of the country, producing both wheat and rice.
The
crisis that
India
faces illustrates the dilemma in which many developing countries find
themselves. They are facing the prospects of climate change when they have not
been primarily responsible for such impacts. Industrial countries are to blame
for emitting greenhouse gases over generations and causing the earth’s
temperatures to rise.
On
the eve of the World Summit on Sustainable Development in
Johannesburg
in 2002, the UN Environment Programme put out a report that there was “an
Asian brown cloud”, consisting of dust particles and the like, which was
hovering over the sub-continent and contributing to global warming. Indian
scientists, however, criticized the report, claiming that climate change was a
global phenomenon and could not be localized in this manner. There was a strong
suspicion about the timing of the report before the environment summit: if
accepted, these findings would have lifted some of the burden from rich
countries for altering the climate.
Terrorism
vs. Climate Change
|

|
|
The US contributes around one-fifth of the world's carbon dioxide emissions |
The
main offender in this regard, the United States, which contributes around
one-fifth of the world's carbon dioxide emissions – the main greenhouse gas
– could not have been comforted by the recent leak of a Pentagon document that
the threat to the planet’s stability due to climate change is far greater than
that of terrorism. President George W. Bush has refused to sign the
Kyoto
protocol, which seeks to curb such emissions.
A
secret report, which has been suppressed for four months by US defense chiefs
but obtained by The Observer newspaper
in Britain, reveals that climate change could result in nuclear conflict,
mega-droughts, famines and rioting in as little as 20 years. It predicts that
disputes over access to natural resources – water, food and energy – could
compel countries to deploy nuclear arms.
The
report was commissioned by Andrew Marshall, an influential Pentagon adviser who
was responsible for recommending sweeping changes to the
US
military under Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. The authors were Peter
Schwartz, CIA consultant and former head of planning at Royal Dutch/Shell Group,
and Doug Randall of the California-based Global Business Network.
Major
European cities could be submerged by the rise in ocean levels, while
Britain
could find itself freezing in Siberian weather by
2020. This betrays the Pentagon’s
lack of concern for coastal cities in developing countries, which are much more
populous and whose residents are too poor to withstand the impact of climate
change.
The
report grimly concludes that, “Disruption and conflict will be endemic
features of life. Once again, warfare would define human life.” The
authors believe that climate change should not be relegated to a scientific
debate – President Bush has for quite some time even denied its existence –
but raised to a national security concern.
The
former head of the Meteorological Office in the
US
, Sir John Houghton, who was the first to draw the parallel between climate
change and the threat from terrorism, said: “If the Pentagon is sending out that
sort of message, then this is an important document indeed.”
According
to Bob Watson, the former American head of the Inter-Governmental Panel on
Climate Change, which represents 2,500 scientists from around the world and is
the most authoritative source on global warming, President Bush would have to
act on this report, because the two groups the administration listens to are the
Pentagon and the oil lobby.
The
US
government has already
embarked on a damage limitation exercise. In early March, the State Department's
Paula Dobriansky told the Federation of Austrian Industry in
Vienna
that the administration was
"fully committed to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change and shares its ultimate objective of stabilizing greenhouse gas
concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that will prevent dangerous human
interference with the climate."
Doug
Randall told The Observer that the national security threat posed by climate
change was unique because “there is no enemy to point your guns at”.
He believed that the consequences for some nations would be
“unbelievable” and recommended a reduction in the consumption of fossil
fuels as inevitable.
Darryl
D’Monte is the founder President of the International Federation of
Environmental Journalists and is serving a second term until 2003. He is also
the Chairperson of the Forum of Environmental Journalists of
India
(FEJI) and a syndicated columnist and freelance writer. He has published two
books: “
Temples
or Tombs? Industry versus Environment: Three Controversies”, Center for
Science & Environment,
New Delhi
, 1985 and “Ripping the Fabric: The Decline of Mumbai and its Mills”,
Oxford
University
Press,
New Delhi
, 2002. He was previously the Resident Editor of the “Indian Express”
(1979-1981) and of the “Times of
India
” (1988-1994) in Mumbai. Your emails will be forwarded to him by contacting
the editor at: ScienceTech@islam-online.net