 |
|
Darwin
|
According
to the theory of evolution, every living species has sprung from a predecessor.
A previously existing species turned into something else in time and all species
have come into being in this way. According to the theory, this transformation
proceeds gradually over millions of years. If this was the case, then numerous
intermediary species should have existed and lived within this long
transformation period.
For
instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles should have lived in the past, which had
acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits they already had.
Or there should have existed some reptile-birds, which acquired some bird traits
in addition to the reptilian traits they already had. Evolutionists refer to
these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past, as
"transitional forms".
If
such animals had really existed, there should be millions and even billions of
them in number and variety. More importantly, the remains of these strange
creatures should be present in the fossil record. The number of these
transitional forms should have been even greater than the present animal species
and their remains should be found all over the world.
Even
Darwin himself was aware of the absence of such transitional forms. It was his
hope that they would be found in the future. Despite his hopefulness, he
realised that the biggest stumbling block in his theory was the missing
transitional forms. Therefore in his book The Origin of Species he wrote
the following in the chapter "Difficulties of the Theory":
…
Why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we
not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature
in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?…
But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why
do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the
earth?… But in the intermediate region, having intermediate conditions of
life, why do we not now find closely linking intermediate varieties? This
difficulty for a long time quite confounded me1.
The
single explanation Darwin could come up with to counter this objection was the
argument that the fossil record uncovered so far was inadequate. He asserted
that when the fossil record had been studied in detail, the missing links would
be found.
Believing
in Darwin’s prophecy, evolutionists have been searching for fossils and
digging for missing links since the middle of the 19th century all over the
world. Despite their best efforts, no transitional forms have yet been
uncovered. All the fossils unearthed in excavations showed that contrary to
the beliefs of evolutionists, life appeared on earth all of a sudden and
fully-formed. Trying to prove their theory, the evolutionists have instead
unwittingly caused it to collapse.
Like
many other evolutionists, the evolutionist palaeontologist Mark Czarnecki
comments as follows:
A
major problem in proving the theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of
vanished species preserved in the Earth's geological formations. This record has
never revealed traces of Darwin's hypothetical intermediate variants - instead
species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fuelled the
creationist argument that each species was created by God2.
Life
Emerged on Earth Suddenly and in Complex Forms
When
terrestrial strata and the fossil record are examined, it is to be seen that all
living organisms appeared simultaneously. The oldest stratum of the earth in
which fossils of living creatures have been found is that of the Cambrian, which
has an estimated age of 500-550 million years.
The
living creatures found in the strata belonging to the Cambrian period emerged
all of a sudden in the fossil record-there are no pre-existing ancestors. The
fossils found in the Cambrian rocks belonged to snails, trilobites, sponges,
earthworms, jellyfish, sea hedgehogs, and other complex invertebrates. This wide
mosaic of living organisms made up of such a great number of complex creatures
emerged so suddenly that this miraculous event is referred to as the
"Cambrian Explosion" in geological literature.
Most
of the life forms found in these strata have complex systems like eyes, gills,
circulatory
systems,
and advanced physiological structures no different from their modern
counterparts. For instance, the double-lensed, combed eye structure of
trilobites is a wonder of design. David Raup, a professor of geology in Harvard,
Rochester, and Chicago Universities, says: "the trilobites used an
optimal design which would require a well trained and imaginative optical
engineer to develop today"3.
Deeper
investigation into the Cambrian Explosion shows what a great dilemma it creates
for the theory of evolution. Recent findings indicate that almost all phyla, the
most basic animal divisions, emerged abruptly in the Cambrian period. An article
published in Science magazine in 2001 says: "The beginning of the
Cambrian period, some 545 million years ago, saw the sudden appearance in the
fossil record of almost all the main types of animals (phyla) that still
dominate the biota today"4. The same article notes that for such complex and
distinct living groups to be explained according to the theory of evolution,
very rich fossil beds showing a gradual developmental process should have been
found, but this has not yet proved possible:
This
differential evolution and dispersal, too, must have required a previous
history of the group for which there is no fossil record. Furthermore,
cladistic analyses of arthropod phylogeny revealed that trilobites, like
eucrustaceans, are fairly advanced "twigs" on the arthropod tree.
But fossils of these alleged ancestral arthropods are lacking… Even if
evidence for an earlier origin is discovered, it remains a challenge to
explain why so many animals should have increased in size and acquired shells
within so short a time at the base of the Cambrian5.
How
the earth came to overflow with such a great number of living groups all of a
sudden and how these distinct creatures with no common ancestors could have
emerged is a question that remains unanswered by evolutionists. The Oxford
zoologist Richard Dawkins, one of the foremost advocates of evolutionist thought
in the world, comments on this reality that invalidates the very roots of all
the arguments he has been defending:
For
example the Cambrian strata of rocks, vintage about 600 million years, are the
oldest ones in which we find most of the major invertebrate groups. And we
find many of them already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first
time they appear. It is as though they were just planted there, without any
evolutionary history. Needless to say, this appearance of sudden planting
has delighted creationists6.
As
Dawkins is forced to acknowledge, the Cambrian Explosion is strong evidence for
creation, because creation is the only way to explain the fully formed emergence
of life on earth. Darwin himself recognised the possibility of this when he
wrote: "If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have
really started into life all at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory
of descent with slow modification through natural selection7." The
Cambrian Period is nothing more or less than Darwin’s "fatal
stroke". This is why the Swiss evolutionist paleoanthropologist Stefan
Bengston confesses the lack of transitional links while he describes the
Cambrian Period and says, "Baffling (and embarrassing) to Darwin, this
event still dazzles us"8. As may be seen, the fossil record indicates that
living things did not evolve from primitive to the advanced forms, but instead
emerged all of a sudden and in a perfect state. In short, living beings did not
come into existence by evolution, they were created.
Another
fact that puts evolutionists into a deep quandary about the Cambrian Explosion
is the comparisons between different living taxa. The results of these
comparisons reveal that animal taxa considered to be “close relatives” by
evolutionists until quite recently, are genetically very different, which puts
the “intermediate form” hypothesis, that only exists theoretically, into an
even greater quandary. An article published in the Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences in 2000 reports that DNA analyses have displaced taxa that
used to be considered “intermediate forms” in the past:
DNA
sequence analysis dictates new interpretation of phylogenic trees. Taxa that
were once thought to represent successive grades of complexity at the base of
the metazoan tree are being displaced to much higher positions inside the
tree. This leaves no evolutionary ‘‘intermediates’’ and forces us to
rethink the genesis of bilaterian complexity9...
In
the same article, evolutionist writers note that some taxa which were considered
“intermediate” between groups such as sponges, cnidarians and ctenophores
can no longer be considered as such because of new genetic findings, and that
they have “lost hope” of constructing such evolutionary family trees.
(1)
Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition,
Harvard University Press, 1964, pp. 172, 280.
(2)
Mark Czarnecki, "The Revival of the Creationist Crusade",
MacLean's, January 19, 1981, p. 56.
(3)
David Raup, "Conflicts Between Darwin and Palaeontology",
Bulletin, Field Museum of Natural History, Vol 50, January 1979, p. 24.
(4)
Richard Fortey, "The Cambrian Explosion Exploded?” Science, vol 293,
No 5529, 20 July 2001, p. 438-439.
(5)
Richard Fortey, "The Cambrian Explosion Exploded?” Science, vol 293, No
5529, 20 July 2001, p. 438-439.
(6)
Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, London: W. W. Norton 1986, p. 229..
(7)
Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard
University Press, 1964, p. 302.
(8)
Stefan Bengston, Nature, Vol. 345, 1990, p. 765..
(9)
The New Animal Phylogeny: Reliability And Implications, Proc. of Nat. Aca. of
Sci., 25 April 2000, vol 97, No 9, p. 4453-4456.
Read
Also:
Harun
Yahya:
Adnan Oktar is a respected author who
authored more than 150 books with the pen name Harun Yahya on faith-related
topics, on the signs of Allah in the universe, on political issues concerning
ummah, and research-based books on Freemasons. His articles are already
regularly being published in many Turkish magazines/newspapers and foreign
Islamic magazines/ papers in all the corners of the world. Many of his books,
among which we can mention "The Evolution Deceit", "Perished
Nations" and "For Men of Understanding", have been published in
England in English and gained tremendous success.
You
may obtain information about Harun Yahya books at: www.hyahya.org