|
|
The pope's remarks ignited worldwide Muslim furor. (Reuters)
|
CAIRO – Editorials in leading US and UK dailies
censured Saturday, September16, Pope Benedict XVI' for his anti-Islam
rant, saying that the comments reflected poor judgment and risk
deepening Islam-West rift.
British The Guardian said there might have
been less protest had Benedict a clearer record in favor of dialogue
with Islam.
"As a cardinal in the Holy See, he was known
to be skeptical of John Paul II's pursuit of conversation. One of his
earliest decisions as pope was to move archbishop Michael Fitzgerald,
one of the Catholic Church's leading experts on Islam, and head of its
council on interreligious dialogue, away from the centre of influence
in Rome, and send him to Egypt as papal nuncio," it said.
It also cited the pope's outspoken opposition to
the admission of Turkey into the European Union, saying that his
planned visit to Istanbul was no unlikely.
Speaking at the University of Regensburg on
Tuesday, Benedict quoted criticism of Islam and Prophet Muhammad
(peace and blessings be upon him) by 14th century Byzantine Emperor
Manuel II Palaeologus, who wrote that everything Muhammad brought was
evil and inhuman, "such as his command to spread by the sword the
faith he preached."
In his inaugural speech last year, the pope ignored
Islam and hailed the "great spiritual heritage" shared by
Jews and Christians.
Benedict recently backpedaled on calling the July 7
London transport bombings "anti-Christian" after an early
draft of a Vatican statement condemning the bombings included the
inflammatory phrase.
Instead, a final version approved by the pope
stopped at referring to the blasts as "barbaric acts against
humanity."
Bad Example
The Guardian said the pope was quoted the wrong
person when he talked about Islam and Prophet Muhammad.
"Manuel II Palaeologus (1350-1425) was hardly
an impartial observer of Islam. No academic impartiality lay behind
the assertion, repeated by the Pope in his lecture in Regensburg
earlier this week, that all that was new in Muhammad's thought was
"evil and inhuman", citing conversion under threat of the
sword as an example," it said.
And the paper ridiculed the pope for the example he
cited.
The Pope used this to kick off a discussion of God
and reason rather as a parish priest might casually preface his Sunday
homily with a reference to the storyline of EastEnders. It is
unsurprising that it caused offence," it said, referring to the
popular BBC television soap opera.
The offensive remarks have stirred uproar in the
Muslim world with Muslim scholars blaming the pontiff's words for his
ignorance of Islam.
Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, the head of the
International Union for Muslim Scholars (IUMS), said on Friday the
pope's words reflected ignorance of the basic tenets of Islam.
Din Syamsuddin, chairman of Muhammadiyah, the
second largest Islamic organization in Indonesia, agreed.
"The Pope's statements reflect his lack of
wisdom. It is obvious from the statements that the Pope doesn't have a
correct understanding of Islam," Syamsuddin told Reuters.
"Tragic and Dangerous"
The New York Times also published an
editorial Saturday, in which it called the pope's remarks about Islam
"tragic and dangerous" and urged him to apologize.
The paper said this was "not the first time
the pope has fomented discord between Christians and Muslims."
"A doctrinal conservative, his greatest fear
appears to be the loss of a uniform Catholic identity, not exactly the
best jumping-off point for tolerance or interfaith dialogue," the
editorial said.
"The world listens carefully to the words of
any pope," The Times continued. "And it is tragic and
dangerous when one sows pain, either deliberately or carelessly. He
needs to offer a deep and persuasive apology, demonstrating that words
can also heal."
A growing chorus of Muslim leaders worldwide were
united Friday, September 15, in insisting on a personal apology from
Pope Benedict over his comments.
They said that the pope should apologize personally
and not through Vatican sources, to all Muslims for such a wrong
interpretation.