WORLD
CAPITAL, March 14, 2006 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – The
Arab League and the pan-Muslim body on Tuesday, March 14, accused the US
and Britain of coordinating with Israeli occupation forces to detain the
leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).
"Clearly,
there is some sort of coordination," Arab League Secretary General
Amr Moussa told the Doha-based Al-Jazeera news television by phone.
"This
(withdrawal of US and British monitors) raises obvious question
marks."
The
US and Britain withdrew their monitors from the jail in the West Bank
city of Areha (Jericho) where Ahmed Saadat was held minutes before the
Israeli raid.
The
Israeli army later confirmed the detention of Saadat and five others
after having pounded the compound with tank and missile fire through the
day.
The
Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) also heaped blame on the US
and Britain, warning this would escalate "violence and
extremism" throughout the world.
"The
governments of Britain and the United States bear direct and serious
responsibility for what happened in the prison and escalating what took
place later," the OIC said in a statement cited by Reuters.
Saadat
has been jailed under US and British supervision since August 2002 after
the PFLP claimed the 2001 killing of far-right Israeli tourism minister
Rehavam Zeevi to avenge the assassination of Saadat's predecessor.
Defending
 |
|
Straw said the monitors were pulled out because they faced "an increasing threat to their safety." (Reuters)
|
The
US and Britain defended their decision to withdraw their monitors from
the jail before the Israeli operation, reported Agence France-Presse
(AFP).
British
Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the monitors were pulled out because
they faced "an increasing threat to their safety."
He
said Britain had earlier Tuesday withdrawn its monitors from the prison
because the Palestinian Authority had never met its obligations to
protect them.
Straw
said he had informed both Israel and the Palestinians of Britain's
intention to withdraw the monitors with immediate effect on March 8, as
he had been required to do, but did not give a date to ensure their
safety.
The
foreign secretary said he had considered withdrawing the British
monitors last year due to safety fears, but judged that the risk level
was just about acceptable.
"The
monitors were withdrawn because of concerns for their safety. The
Palestinians were informed repeatedly about these concerns," US
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said in Jakarta.
The
Western observer mission at the prison was a joint Anglo-American
operation under British command, he added.
The
US spokesman refused to give an explanation why the monitors were
withdrawn just minutes before an Israeli raid on the prison which left
two Palestinian security guards dead and several injured.
"Ask
the Israelis."