 |
|
"No leadership, no strategy, no coordination, no structure and inaccessible to ordinary Iraqis," said
Sawers.
|
CAIRO,
March 14, 2006 (IslamOnline.net) – Leaked memos have shown that
British Prime Minister Tony Blair was warned at the very beginning of
the US-led occupation of Iraq that the US postwar plan was a
mess as a declassified Pentagon document said that US intelligence
agencies misread Saddam Hussein's directions on weapons of mass
destruction, leading British and US newspapers reported Tuesday, March
14.
In
a series of confidential memos to Downing Streets in May and June
2003, John Sawers, Blair's envoy in Baghdad in the aftermath of the
US-invasion of Iraq, described the US postwar administration led by
retired US general Jay Garner as "an unbelievable mess", The
Guardian said.
"No
leadership, no strategy, no coordination, no structure and
inaccessible to ordinary Iraqis," said Sawers in a May 11, 2003
memo titled "Iraq: What's Going Wrong," less than two months
after the US-led invasion.
"Garner
and his top team of 60-year-old retired generals were well meaning but
out of their depth," added Sawers, who is now political director
at the Foreign Office.
The
memo catalogued a series of US failures that contained the seeds of
ongoing insecurity and anarchy in the occupied Arab country.
It
cited the lack of interest by Tommy Franks, then commander general of
the US forces, in the post-invasion phase.
The
US authority even failed to deal with health hazards, such as 40% of
Baghdad's sewage pouring into the Tigris and rubbish piling up in the
streets, added that document.
The
memo said that the sacking of many of Saddam Hussein's Baath party was
among the major failures of the US authority in Iraq.
On
May 23, 2003, former US civil administrator in Iraq Paul Bremer
announced the dissolution of the Iraqi army forces, other security
structures of the ousted regime and the information ministry.
The
order also does away with the Ministry of Defense and Hussein's elite
Republican Guard corps.
"Seduced"
 |
|
Powell's UNSC presentation depended on information misinterpreted by the US intelligence services.
|
Sawers'
grim message was further reinforced by Major General Albert Whitely
few weeks later.
"We
may have been seduced into something we might be inclined to regret.
Is strategic failure a possibility? The answer has to be 'yes',"
Whitely said in a separate note.
He
accused Garner of underestimating the reaction of lay Iraqis.
"There
was a blind faith that Phase IV (postwar period) would work. There was
a failure to anticipate the extent of the backlash or mood of Iraqi
society," he wrote.
Both
Sawers and Whitley blamed US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's
decision to cut troops after the invasion.
Sawers
advocated sending a British battalion, the 16th Air Assault Brigade,
to Baghdad to help fill the gap.
However,
Downing Street rejected the plan weeks later despite the prior US
approval.
Sawers
particularly criticized the US Third Infantry Division, describing it
as "a big part of the problem" in Baghdad.
He
said the US troopers were reluctant to leave their heavily armored
vehicles to carry out policing.
He
cited an incident when British troops saw them fire three tank rounds
into a building in response to a relatively harmless rifle fire.
(Click
to Read the memos)
Misinterpreting
A
declassified Pentagon's report, meanwhile, revealed that US
intelligence in 2002 misread internal Iraqi messages about weapons of
mass destruction, according to the Washington Post.
The
report by the Pentagon's Joint Forces Command said that the US
intelligence officials believed incorrectly the Iraqi orders were a
ruse meant to hide evidence of such weapons from UN inspectors.
The
report said when US intelligence intercepted an internal message in
2002 between two Iraqi commanders talking about removing the words
"nerve agents" from "wireless instructions," the
analysts "had no way of knowing that this time the information
reflected the regime's attempt to ensure it was in compliance with UN
resolutions".
This
message was cited by former US Secretary of State Colin Powell in his
February 5, 2003 statement to the UN Security Council as an example of
Iraq's bad faith, said the magazine.
Powell,
who had forcibly made the case for the Iraq invasion in his UN
Security Council presentation, regretted in September his UN
statement, saying it was a "blot" on his record.
Another
misread Iraqi message also from 2002 referred to instructions to
"search the area surrounding the headquarters camp and (the unit)
for any chemical agents, make sure the area is free of chemical
containers, and write a report on it."
The
US analysts viewed this information through the prism of a decade of
prior deceit.
"They
had no way of knowing that this time the information reflected the
regime's attempt to ensure it was in compliance with UN
resolutions," said the document.
US
President George W. Bush admitted in December that faulty intelligence
assessments on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction damaged US
credibility
Read
Also:
Chaos,
cholera, Killings Month After Iraq "Liberation": Report
Iraqi
children Ask: Isn’t America Fed Up With Killing Yet?