CAIRO,
August 10, 2005 (IslamOnline.net) – Britain's proposed secret courts
to try terror suspects have drawn fire from British officials and
civil rights activists, a leading British newspaper reported
Wednesday, August. 10.
Ian
Macdonald QC, who resigned last year as a barrister in special terror
cases, described the proposed secretive courts as "botched",
according to the Guardian.
"If
you are going to move to a completely new system of pre-trial
investigation along the French lines, we haven't got a corps of judges
who can lead a major investigation into crime.
"What
it looks like is that it won't, in fact, be anything like the French
system, but will, in fact, be a method of extending the detention of
suspects for more than two weeks," Macdonald told the paper.
The
Guardian revealed Tuesday that Britain
was mulling the set up of secret courts to prosecute terror suspects
as part of the crackdown following the July 7, terrorist attacks in
the capital London.
Special
Courts
The
anti-terror courts -- run by judges with special high-level security
clearance --
would meet behind closed doors to investigate the merits of the case
against terror suspects, the Guardian said.
Lord
chancellor, Lord Falconer, said the British government plans to set up
special courts with security-cleared judges to hold pre-trial hearings
to decide the length of time terror suspects should be held before
they were charged or released.
British
security services and police have been pressing for extending the
detention period of terror suspects to three months without charge,
more than the current 14 days.
Lord
Falconer claimed that the extension of the detention period was just a
"sensible period to detain suspects while sensible investigation
is going on".
He
maintained that the proposed courts could help with using intelligence
material, including phone-tap evidence, in courts without revealing
informants or how the information was obtained.
Lord
Falconer said that the anti-terror courts will consider whether
sensitive intelligence materials would be used in conventional courts.
"Dreadful"
The
civil rights group Liberty said, however, the involvement of judges in
the special courts could not "sanitize an unfair process".
"The
thought of secret hearings where once again the accused will never
hear the case against them fills me with dread," the Liberty
Director Shami Chakrabarti said.
One
possible model for the pre-trial hearings could be the Special
Immigrations Appeals Tribunal, which sits in secret and keeps the
details of charges from those facing them.
Home
Office officials said it is unlikely the plans will be ready to be
included in planned new anti-terrorism laws due to be debated by
Parliament this autumn.
British
Prime Minister Tony Blair unveiled Friday, August 5, new sweeping
anti-terror powers.
The
measures include deporting and excluding foreigners who are accused of
"condoning and inciting violence" and closing worship places
used for "fomenting terrorism".
They
also include stripping people of their British nationality if proved
acting against British interests.