 |
|
Albar Speaking to IOL
|
By
Abdulhadi Ahmed, IOL Staff
DOHA,
June 28, 2005 (IslamOnline.net) - Malaysia, the current chair of the
Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), is a staunch supporter of
reforming the pan-Muslim body.
It
believes that the OIC urgently needs dramatic changes, including a new
charter, name and decision-making mechanism, to face the daunting
challenges ahead.
Malaysian
Foreign Minister Syed Hamid Albar maintains that at the age of
globalization and economic blocs, the OIC can not remain a political
umbrella and needs to activate economic cooperation and integration
among member states.
OIC
started a ministerial meeting in the Yemeni capital Tuesday, June 28,
dedicated to discussing reforms and other issues related to the Muslim
world.
Following
is a transcript of an interview IslamOnline.net had with the top
diplomat on the sidelines of the two-day summit of the G77 and China,
hosted by Doha on June 18-19.
What
are the problems hindering the OIC?
The
real problem with the OIC is that we present only an organization of
conference countries. We are not an organization as such. We are a
loose movement and we don’t have enough money, we don’t have the
support in order to be like any other regional organizations or
multilateral organizations. We are not able to meet the challenges of
today, so we must have a research group within the OIC, we must have a very a strong secretariat that would be able to improve the
image of Islamic countries.
What
are the main ideas for reforming the OIC?
When
the OIC was born it was a result of the burning of Al-Aqsa mosque.
Since then we have expanded our activities into various areas, so the
OIC definitely has to move with facts, has to be updated. We are
moving into a world of globalization, we are moving into a world that
is full of liberalization of market, of economy, and the OIC can’t
remain just purely a political body. There are a lot of advantages by
working together for our economic wellbeing and benefits. So I think
in this direction, the OIC as a secretariat has to be revitalized, has
to be restructured in order to meet the new challenges of the 21st
century. And the OIC as an organization has to be updated, which means
we have to look at our charter, not only the issue of Palestine, that
is important, the issue of economic cooperation, the issue of
globalization, the issue of relationship with other regional
organizations, with other countries, what is the position of a Muslim
minority in non-Muslim country, how do we project the image of Islam
as being a religion of peace, so all these are new dictates and new
demands that we work very closely interfacing with the world. The
present world look at Islam and Muslim equal to terrorism, so we must
change this mindset of the west, we must create a dialogue, we must
say that it is not Islam that is wrong, the extremism has nothing to
do with the religion, so I think we need to change the way we move.
Like Malaysia, we talk about a new approach of Islam Hadhari, manhaj
Hadhari, the process of creating a Muslim who believes in Iman and
taqwa (piety) but at the same time who is progressing, who is modern,
rely on knowledge, who is fair to the minority, who is fair to women,
who wants to create progress, he seeks knowledge, this is what Hadhari
is, civlizational approach of Islam, of this humanistic civilizational
approach of Islam. So people understand that Islam that one time was
the bastion of civilization can now come back to become one, not to be
in conflict with others, but to be part of the mainstream of
international relations and of international politics. At present we
are much marginalized.
So
the OIC needs new name and charter?
I
think it is not only the name change, the name we want to do it
because we think that in the name also there would be a change in the
mindset but possible Muslim countries must make mohasaba within
themselves. So in order for you to change you must look at yourself,
if we look at ourselves critically , only then we will be able to
change.
What
about the charter, are you talking about re-writing the charter?
I
think the charter needs to be updated in order for the OIC to be
developed. The present charter is not satisfactory, there are quite
number of elements that are not in the charter that make things
unclear and very difficult for us to move. In order to change the
organization of Islamic countries since set as a conference body. We
want to see, not (an organization of ) conference countries, but of
Islamic states, so people can set the terms, they can set the
parameters of membership.
Will
there be new conditions for OIC membership?
I
think sometimes there should be new conditions. People who want to be
members must be serious, they must contribute to the well-being of the
OIC. It is better to have quality than just to have quantity.
Do
You think that there should be new conditions?
This
is what we are thinking. We asked other countries to look at it
because we can not impose our view on other countries.
We
have heard that Malaysia wants Islam Hadhari to be part of the reform.
In what way can this be?
It
is not a theory, it is an approach to work the fulfillment of deen
(Religion), it is not a new Madhab, it is not a new school, it is just
an approach to improve and create a better image of Islam, that is
modernistic and progressing and at the same time, is still strong on
morality, on faith, on knowledge, on protection of women, giving
justice, treating everybody equally. So it is in essence trying to
bring about change of attitude among Muslims and at the same time for
non-Muslims to look at Islam that this religion is not against
development, not against modernity, not against progress, not against
knowledge. So I think this what we are trying to do. And like in
Malaysia, Islam Hadhari is seen as one of the programs in order to
make people see Islam as a religion of enlightenment, a religion of
peace, a religion of development, that is what we think we want to do.
Up
till now, how do you see the member states responding to the reforms?
Generally,
they all agree to the reform, but the question is of the mode of
reform that we have not discussed in great details but everyone says
yes. There is an equal need for reform.
How
will the reform process proceed?
I
think we have discussed this in Kuala Lumpur. We discussed the
conclusion in Kuala Lumpur and again in Islamabad, and at the end we
hope we discuss it at the foreign ministers’ in Sanaa.
Also
read: