 |
|
A Bangladeshi boy holds up the Noble Qur’an in protest at the Guantanamo desecration. (Reuters)
|
WASHINGTON, June 4, 2005 (IslamOnline.net
& News Agencies) – The US military detailed on Friday, June 3,
five cases in which jailers at the US prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba,
had desecrated copies of the Noble Qur’an, including one incident
which occurred as recent as March.
US South Command, responsible for the
notorious prison at the US naval base, detailed in a statement for the
first time how the Muslim divine book was splashed by a guard’s
urine, kicked, stepped on and soaked in water, Reuters news agency
reported.
The statement followed the completion
of a military inquiry launched after a May 9 Newsweek article,
quoting a knowledgeable US government source, said US interrogators at
Guantanamo had flushed a copy of the Qur’an down a toilet to try to
"soften" the detainees.
After harsh criticism from the
Pentagon, the weekly cast some doubts on the story in its May 23
edition, saying the source “couldn't be certain about reading of the
alleged Qur'an incident in the report we cited, and said it might have
been in other investigative documents or drafts”.
The report sparked angry and violent
protests across the Muslim world from Afghanistan, where 16 were
killed and more than 100 injured, to Gaza City.
Five Cases
Brig. Gen. Jay Hood, commander of the
Guantanamo prison who headed the inquiry, said the inquiry has
confirmed five cases of desecration.
In the incident involving urine,
which took place this past March, the statement said that a guard left
his observation post, went outside and urinated near an air vent, and
“the wind blew his urine through the vent” and into a cell block.
It said a detainee told guards the
urine “splashed on him and his Qur’an.”
The statement said the detainee was
given a new prison uniform and Qur’an, and that the guard was
reprimanded and given duty in which he had no contact with prisoners.
Army Capt. John Adams, a spokesman at
Guantanamo, said the inquiry deemed the incident “accidental.”
South Command also said a civilian
contractor interrogator apologized in July 2003 to a detainee for
stepping on his Qur’an.
The interrogator “was later
terminated for a pattern of unacceptable behavior, an inability to
follow direct guidance and poor leadership,” the statement said.
In August 2003, prisoners' copies of
the Qur’an became wet when night-shift guards threw water balloons
in a cell block, the statement said.
In the fourth desecrating incident,
South Command said a prisoner in August 2003 complained that a
“two-word obscenity” had been written in English in his Qur’an.
South Command said it was
“possible” a guard had written the words but “equally
possible” the prisoner himself had done it. It did not offer an
explanation of the detainee's possible motive.
In February 2002, guards kicked a
prisoner's Qur’an, it added.
In the statement, Hood reiterated
that the inquiry found “no credible evidence” that a guard ever
flushed a Qur’an down a toilet, stating that “the matter is
considered closed.”
Hood further said there were four
additional incidents of “alleged mishandling” of the Qur’an that
“we cannot determine conclusively if they actually happened.”
These involved prisoners' complaints
that jailers kicked and put a foot on the Qur’an, threw it into a
bag of wet towels, and told a detainee the book “belonged in the
toilet.”
The United States holds about 520
detainees at Guantanamo, most caught in Afghanistan, and has
classified them as “enemy combatants” not entitled to rights given
to prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions.
The high-security prison opened in
January 2002 for non-US citizens caught in the US-led war on
terrorism, and many prisoners have been held more than three years
without charges.
Human Rights Watchdog blasted last
week the prison as the “gulag of our times,” challenging
Washington to open the military detention center to outside
inspections.
The group further said in a 25 May
report that human rights were in retreat worldwide because of
Washington's war on terror which gave other countries an excuse to
roll back the rule of law.