SYDNEY,
March 21, 2005 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – In a
precedent that could cause serious consequences, a group of 30 Iranian
and Iraqi detainees in Australia who had their asylum claims rejected
have won a review of their cases after some converted to Christianity.
A
spokesman for Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone said Monday, March
21, the 30 boatpeople, most of them Muslims and some who have been in
detention for more than three years, had won the review after some
claimed to be converts about two weeks ago, reported Reuters.
The
group had exhausted all assessment and appeals procedures but would be
able to begin the process afresh for a “variety of circumstances”
including conversion to Christianity and changed conditions in their
home country, the spokesman said.
He
could not say how many had converted to Christianity but added that,
in some cases, new information had also arisen about the dangers of
them being returned to their homelands.
Muslim
organizations in Australia estimate the number of Muslims in Australia
at 350,000.
Outrage
 |
|
“There's
no denominational or religious-specific clause in the
administration of our immigration policy," Howard said.
|
The
move drew swift angry reactions from the opposition and Muslim
minority leaders who warned against reviewing asylum claims based on
religion.
They
said Australia's international reputation could suffer and other
detainees might convert merely to stay in the country.
“To
see that Australia is actively encouraging Muslims to convert to
another religion is something that we don't need to be stigmatized
with,” Lebanese Muslim Association president Keysar Trad told
reporters.
“Muslims
generally aren't known for using their religion for worldly advantage,
but there will be some weak in faith who will see it as a way of
getting a visa,” he added.
Greens
party senator Bob Brown, a staunch critic of the government's asylum
seeker detention policy, said religion was only relevant if it was the
reason detainees had been persecuted before arriving in Australia.
“The
rule here is humanity, not the religious belief of some of those poor
people who are facing export to countries where they face
punishment,” he stressed.
“Let's
not underestimate persecution that occurs in different countries but I
think that if the government makes a decision on the basis of
religion, as opposed to having a process of compassion and expediency,
there is a real danger in causing people to go down that pathway,”
leader of the Family First Party Peter Harris said on ABC radio.
But
refugee advocate Marion Le downplayed fears of other Muslim detainees
converting to Christianity to gain visas.
“There's
never been an idea that by becoming a Christian you will be allowed to
stay. They would know by converting they are doing a very serious
thing and that other people who are Muslims in the detention centers
could turn against them,” she said.
Howard
Defends Move
Prime
Minister John Howard, for his part, argued that Australia, which has a
tough policy of automatic detention of asylum seekers who arrive
illegally, was not discriminating in favor of Christians, reported
Agence France-Presse (AFP).
“There's
no denominational or religious-specific clause in the administration
of our immigration policy,” he told ABC radio.
“Concerns
about religious persecution can vary from one religion to another
(and) are always factors in deciding how we deal with people,”
Howard said.
“The
idea that we would introduce something that is peculiar only to people
who convert to Christianity -- that's not correct,” he argued.
The
Sydney Morning Herald said that these
people, who have had their applications to stay rejected, could not be
returned to their home countries for various reasons.
One
detainee, Peter Qasim from Kashmir, has been in detention for more
than six years but India will not take him back.
According
to reports, these people would not be granted permanent residency in
Australia but their applications would be assessed while they were
living in the community rather than behind bars.
Australian
immigration law calls for mandatory and unlimited detention of asylum
seekers.