 |
|
“I’m afraid that the new Iraqi government will be a replica of the US-handpicked and now dissolved Interim Governing Council,” said Daraji.
|
By
Mazen Ghazi, IOL Correspondent
BAGHDAD,
February 6 (IslamOnline.net) – The future Iraqi government would
lack the needed legitimacy, being formed under occupation and being the
outcome of “semi-legitimate” election, a spokesman for Shiite
leader Moqtada Al-Sadr said on Sunday, February 6.
“I’m
afraid that the new Iraqi government will be a replica of the
US-handpicked and now dissolved Interim Governing Council,” Abdel
Hadi Al-Daraji told IslamOnline.net.
“It
would also lack the needed legitimacy to exist, which must be derived
from the people’s consent and not from the occupation troops.”
Daraji
stressed that UN resolutions recognize Iraq as a country under foreign
occupation.
“In
Mr. Sadr’s words: ‘The occupiers are doctoring the election
results,’ and therefore we don’t believe in the fairness of the
polls,” he added.
Daraji
underlined that Sadr’s position on the elections remained unchanged.
“We
don’t take part in any political process taking place under an
occupying power, but we didn’t call for an election boycott in order
not to pit Iraqis against one another.”
In
a recent live dialogue with IOL’s visitors, Sheikh Hassan
Al-Zarqani, the media officer of the Al-Sadr Office, warned that the
election ran the risk of a deadly
sectarian conflict.
The
elections will determine the composition of a 275-member National
Assembly that must name a president and two vice presidents who would
later agree on a prime minister and appoint a cabinet.
The
assembly is also in charge of drafting the country’s new
constitution.
Electoral
Commission officials said Saturday, February 5, that the final results
would be announced within five days.
Poor
Turnout
Daraji
further cast doubts on the 60 percent turnout claimed by the Electoral
Commission.
“I
do believe that this percentage is accurate given that a great number
of eligible voters have boycotted the polls,” he told IOL.
Mahdi
Ibrahim, a prominent member of the Association of Muslim Scholars
(AMS), the highest Sunni religious authority, has strongly challenged
British and US claims that the election was a success, putting at no
more than 30 percent turnout.
Most
Sunni powers, along with several Shiite and communist groups, shunned
the controversial vote.
They
maintained that fair elections could never be organized with
occupation troops on Iraqi soil.
Constitution
Asked
whether his group would help draft the country’s new constitution,
Daraji said the matter is being negotiated with political powers and
parties, including those who boycotted the election.
The
AMS conditioned any participation in the wording of the constitution
on a fixed timetable for the withdrawal of US-led occupation troops.
A
senior AMS official told IOL last week that anti-occupation Sunni
powers could wield a veto power if they were marginalized in drafting
the constitution by the Shiites and the Kurds.
According
to many observers, much of the success of the post-election period
will depend on the level of involvement of the Sunni community.
Under
rules agreed last year, an October referendum to ratify that draft
will fail if two-thirds of the voters in any three of Iraq's 18
provinces give it the thumbs-down.
Sunnis'
numerical strength in at least three provinces north and west of
Baghdad gives them such power.
Daraji
further called reconciliation efforts between Iraq’s ethnic and
religious mosaic a “necessary and positive step.”
“But
it should have taken place a long time ago and given more attention
than the election,” he said.
Daraji,
however, said the reconciliation process should be all-inclusive and
supervised by different religious authorities.
Sadr
Inclusion
|
|
“He [Sadr] has a large number of followers. We can involve them,” said Jaaffri.
|
Meanwhile,
a senior Shiite leader with the United Iraqi Alliance (UIA), which
leads in the election’s initial results and is backed by the
country’s top Shiite authority Grand Ayatollah Al-Sistani, cited the
possibility of including Al-Sadr’s group in the would-be government.
“He
[Sadr] has a large number of followers. We can involve them. If they
are not killers, and if we have no evidence against them, then we can
give them a chance to share in the political process,” Ibrahim
Al-Jaaffri, a strong candidate for the prime minister post, told the
Daily Telegraph on Sunday.
He
praised Sadr as a “good person” who could play a constructive role
in the new Iraq.
Last
spring, the US occupation authorities were insisting that Sadr be
“killed or captured” following bloody clashes between his Mahdi
Army fighters and occupation forces.
After
four months of pitched battles, Sadr ordered
his militiamen to disarm and leave Imam Ali Shrine in the holy city of
Najaf as part of a deal brokered by Sistani.
Jaaffri,
who lived in exile in Britain before the US-led invasion of Iraq,
further said there could be a role for leaders of Iraq's Sunnis who
boycotted the elections.
“We
have Sunni brothers who do not believe in elections and we respect
them. We think they are very honest and talk frankly.”